1822 Main Tower (formerly renovation)

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
Post Reply
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20137
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by DaveKCMO »

moderne wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2019 2:56 pm Historic KC is asking to put bank on register and calling for bank bldng to be preserved.
Won't happen if the owner isn't interested -- someone has to pay for the study. See the Plaza church example (and many others). National Register listing doesn't prevent demolition.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 34623
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by KCPowercat »

Shame.
town cow
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:16 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by town cow »

Local historic register listing slows demo way down. Natl register listing does the same if federal $ is involved, btw.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by chaglang »

That’s if the rehab has already taken place. Simply listing it nationally gives the building owner access to funding if they choose to rehab the building in a historically appropriate way. Unless work has been done the owner can do whatever they want with the building.

Local register is the opposite: strict rules about rehab and no access to funds. It’s a remarkably dumb option for a property owner to voluntarily pursue, unless they enjoy going to the Landmarks Commission every time they want to change a light bulb.

As David mentioned, HKC can’t force a property into being listed. They will almost certainly try and have Shields hold it in committee indefinitely if it gets that far.
langosta
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2445
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by langosta »

Any updates at the Port KC meeting today?
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20137
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by DaveKCMO »

langosta wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 9:30 pm Any updates at the Port KC meeting today?
I wasn't there and I haven't seen the minutes, but I'm gonna guess it was approved.
langosta
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2445
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by langosta »

My updated interpretation of the 1 conceptual rendering. Would you guys like to see this done with any other proposed projects?

Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Critical_Mass
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Union Hill

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by Critical_Mass »

Nice work! You can get a sense of the scale. What are the buildings you show to the north? It's only a one story neighbor.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by flyingember »

Critical_Mass wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:51 am Nice work! You can get a sense of the scale. What are the buildings you show to the north? It's only a one story neighbor.
The scale is completely off to the point you can't get a sense of it. There's an existing three story building drawn as shorter than an existing one story building. There's two buildings drawn as three. This building is drawn as wider than it's neighbors to the north which is actually a wider parcel
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by normalthings »

flyingember wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2019 8:20 am
Critical_Mass wrote: Fri Aug 16, 2019 7:51 am Nice work! You can get a sense of the scale. What are the buildings you show to the north? It's only a one story neighbor.
The scale is completely off to the point you can't get a sense of it. There's an existing three story building drawn as shorter than an existing one story building. There's two buildings drawn as three. This building is drawn as wider than it's neighbors to the north which is actually a wider parcel
I’m trying to redo the drawing with a better scale for the surrounding buildings - it’s currently just whatever came off of open street
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by normalthings »

Updates?
User avatar
KCDowntown
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1070
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:17 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by KCDowntown »

Advance KC document located here indicates this will be a 4 story office building atop a 4 story parking pedestal with ground floor retail. 50,000 sqft of office space - 13,000 sqft rented to a law firm, the rest spec. Existing buildings at the site will be razed.

KCDowntown
earthling
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
Location: milky way, orion arm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by earthling »

Good to hear it will have ground level retail. Hopefully the garage entrance doesn't face Main. If they get incentives, the City should require public shared usage for garage.
User avatar
Anthony_Hugo98
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2233
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm
Location: Overland Park, KS

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by Anthony_Hugo98 »

Anyone happen to have any updates on this project, I haven’t been able to find anything about it anywhere
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20137
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by DaveKCMO »

Anthony_Hugo98 wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:45 am Anyone happen to have any updates on this project, I haven’t been able to find anything about it anywhere
Haven't heard a peep. I suspect the incentive request fell on deaf ears.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by normalthings »

DaveKCMO wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:38 pm
Anthony_Hugo98 wrote: Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:45 am Anyone happen to have any updates on this project, I haven’t been able to find anything about it anywhere
Haven't heard a peep. I suspect the incentive request fell on deaf ears.
Property is up for $1.9 million.
User avatar
Chris Stritzel
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by Chris Stritzel »

^ Maybe a new developer will come in and incorporate the old building into a new structure
CrossroadsUrbanApts
Ambassador
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:16 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by CrossroadsUrbanApts »

Good idea but tough to do at that acquisition price. Not enough SF in the existing building(s) to pay that price, I would think.
User avatar
Critical_Mass
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Union Hill

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by Critical_Mass »

At the very least the facade could be saved and incorporated in-place into the exterior of a larger building built behind it. It is handsome and unique. I would think it would add value/character which you couldn't buy with modern construction materials and methods.
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3028
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: 1822 Main Redevlopment

Post by TheLastGentleman »

Facadectomies are better than nothing
Post Reply