changing from curb to center running at union station would be easy. Give all cars a red light and streetcar changes lanes in the intersection by union station, no different than how the streetcar changes lanes by union station now when it goes from station to the northbound lane.tower wrote:If the streetcar through midtown had a dedicated ROW, I assume it would have to be run in the center of the street?
I'm all for both of those things, but how do you you link that up with the current track? It would have to have an akward lane change at Union station or the track would have to be redone all the way back to 20th, the way I see it.
OFFICIAL - Main Street Streetcar Extension
-
- New York Life
- Posts: 434
- Joined: Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:03 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20072
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
dedicated ROW works best in the center. even shared works best in the center if you plan to dedicate that space in the future. the lane change at union station would probably need to occur inside the intersection since it's already signalized.tower wrote:If the streetcar through midtown had a dedicated ROW, I assume it would have to be run in the center of the street?
I'm all for both of those things, but how do you you link that up with the current track? It would have to have an akward lane change at Union station or the track would have to be redone all the way back to 20th, the way I see it.
the project team is working through how to quantitatively assess the best lane now. pretty sure the public will have options to review at the first public meeting. surprisingly, the only streetcar project to contemplate this was charlotte's starter line. seattle's latest expansion (center connector) is going all-center and off-wire. portland's first network map has been built and they are contemplating a new expansion plan now (starting with northwest).
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Has taking, for example, an entire side (ex. SouthBound Lanes) ever been used as the dedicated right of way?
-
- Strip mall
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:45 am
- Location: Midtown
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Switching at the intersection would work okay. I was envisioning it switching at the current lane swap area, for some reason. It would be nice to see streetcar being moved to the center between union station and 20th at a later point.
If you had the entire SB side as the right of way, you would have cars needing to cross over to get into parking lots, garages, etc, but if you have it in the center, you only need to allow cars to cross at major intersections. Also, what would be the benefit? (vs Center)ldai_phs wrote:Has taking, for example, an entire side (ex. SouthBound Lanes) been used as the dedicated right of way?
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Putting both lanes to one side would be much like a two way cycle track on one side.
Running two train lanes on the west side of the road Pershing through 27th could have some value because it would never interact with the condo access along Main for those crown center towers and reduces the number of places cars will interact. NB Crossover at Pershing and NB to EB and EB to SB turns won’t cross track.
Imagine a future hypothetical of a train that avoids the trolley trail park and uses Brookside Blvd. could run both tracks in the current NB lanes and have way fewer interactions with driveways until 59th
So for select areas where impact is limited to one side of the road, it makes sense
For most of midtown, it doesn’t.
Running two train lanes on the west side of the road Pershing through 27th could have some value because it would never interact with the condo access along Main for those crown center towers and reduces the number of places cars will interact. NB Crossover at Pershing and NB to EB and EB to SB turns won’t cross track.
Imagine a future hypothetical of a train that avoids the trolley trail park and uses Brookside Blvd. could run both tracks in the current NB lanes and have way fewer interactions with driveways until 59th
So for select areas where impact is limited to one side of the road, it makes sense
For most of midtown, it doesn’t.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Is there any talk of what the Phase Three Expansion would be?
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20072
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
no.ldai_phs wrote:Is there any talk of what the Phase Three Expansion would be?
-
- Colonnade
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
It should be the Linwood route proposed in 2014.DaveKCMO wrote:no.ldai_phs wrote:Is there any talk of what the Phase Three Expansion would be?
- grovester
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: KC Metro
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
It will be interesting to see how the east side opinion changes after implementation of the starter line and likely approval of the extension.
But then again, they could have just sent them 60k.
But then again, they could have just sent them 60k.
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20072
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
linwood is the most likely. it ranked 2nd in the 2014 expansion plan. independence ave is getting the MAX treatment.
this all assumes someone steps up to lead the fight. i'm done after main street.
this all assumes someone steps up to lead the fight. i'm done after main street.
- Pork Chop
- Colonnade
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 4:41 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Thank you for the amount of energy you put into getting the streetcar started and in the fight to expand it. I do not know of anyone else that has fought as long and as hard as you are doing.DaveKCMO wrote:linwood is the most likely. it ranked 2nd in the 2014 expansion plan. independence ave is getting the MAX treatment.
this all assumes someone steps up to lead the fight. i'm done after main street.
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20072
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
for free? none.Pork Chop wrote:Thank you for the amount of energy you put into getting the streetcar started and in the fight to expand it. I do not know of anyone else that has fought as long and as hard as you are doing.DaveKCMO wrote:linwood is the most likely. it ranked 2nd in the 2014 expansion plan. independence ave is getting the MAX treatment.
this all assumes someone steps up to lead the fight. i'm done after main street.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Maybe Chastain would be close, but he wasn't exactly successful at it and filed court cases and that counts against him.DaveKCMO wrote:for free? none.Pork Chop wrote:Thank you for the amount of energy you put into getting the streetcar started and in the fight to expand it. I do not know of anyone else that has fought as long and as hard as you are doing.DaveKCMO wrote:linwood is the most likely. it ranked 2nd in the 2014 expansion plan. independence ave is getting the MAX treatment.
this all assumes someone steps up to lead the fight. i'm done after main street.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Thank-you for your work! Hopefully after this next expansion, more people will be leading efforts.DaveKCMO wrote:for free? none.Pork Chop wrote:Thank you for the amount of energy you put into getting the streetcar started and in the fight to expand it. I do not know of anyone else that has fought as long and as hard as you are doing.DaveKCMO wrote:linwood is the most likely. it ranked 2nd in the 2014 expansion plan. independence ave is getting the MAX treatment.
this all assumes someone steps up to lead the fight. i'm done after main street.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3850
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
You do a serious disservice to David by making this comparison.flyingember wrote:Maybe Chastain would be close, but he wasn't exactly successful at it and filed court cases and that counts against him.DaveKCMO wrote:for free? none.Pork Chop wrote:
Thank you for the amount of energy you put into getting the streetcar started and in the fight to expand it. I do not know of anyone else that has fought as long and as hard as you are doing.
Chastain has taken moments to conjure fantasy and a few hours to grandstand.
David has committed endless hours for years, doing the hard work to make civic progress.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:47 pm
- Location: South Plaza
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
It wouldn’t have taken that much. Pride goeth before the fall. And if a few people, 1 man in particular, hadn’t been so stubborn, we might well be building that network right now. The same people who wouldn’t pay Freedom off in that election have no problem spreading the money around to a small cadre of developers, business “community” members and “stakeholders”.grovester wrote:It will be interesting to see how the east side opinion changes after implementation of the starter line and likely approval of the extension.
But then again, they could have just sent them 60k.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Focusing only on quantity of work does an even bigger disservice.loftguy wrote:You do a serious disservice to David by making this comparison.flyingember wrote:Maybe Chastain would be close, but he wasn't exactly successful at it and filed court cases and that counts against him.DaveKCMO wrote:
for free? none.
Chastain has taken moments to conjure fantasy and a few hours to grandstand.
David has committed endless hours for years, doing the hard work to make civic progress.
Chastain has clearly worked for way longer in terms of number of years. His efforts go back to 1992 around union station becoming a transit center during the same years Dave was in college outside of KC. So the "as long" part goes to Chastain.
Is making a continual effort over 25+ years more or less hard work than someone putting in a ton of effort in less time? That's really tough to argue either way. Remember, a Chastain plan was the first one to pass an election and the only citywide pass so far so he produced some success even if his methods are bad.
Dave's approach is clearly better and that's what should be recognized. He provided way more value to the city regardless of who the winner is of any "mine is bigger" contest.
Here's a story why getting stuck on quantity misses the point of providing value.
https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?s ... f_Code.txt
- Highlander
- City Center Square
- Posts: 10233
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
There's no comparison here. I do not believe Chastain has does anything for KC's efforts to create a public transportation. In fact, I'd say Chastain's "efforts" have been negative. While it was not Chastain's intent, his involvement in the KC public transportation debate have had results more similar to those hoped to be achieved by CFRG rather than anything that would push forward a true light rail/street car agenda. Obviously, that wasn't the road map that Chastain planned out but it is what he accomplished - essentially nothing other than a public relation major setback for rail transportation in the city. I do not blame Chastain for trying early on (although I do think his motives even then got tangled up with some personal agendas that were not in the best interest of any public transportation program) but at some point he needed to realize the negative reaction to public transportation that became associated with his name and simply bow out of the process. Even now, I'm not sure he has finished.flyingember wrote:Focusing only on quantity of work does an even bigger disservice.loftguy wrote:You do a serious disservice to David by making this comparison.flyingember wrote:
Maybe Chastain would be close, but he wasn't exactly successful at it and filed court cases and that counts against him.
Chastain has taken moments to conjure fantasy and a few hours to grandstand.
David has committed endless hours for years, doing the hard work to make civic progress.
Chastain has clearly worked for way longer in terms of number of years. His efforts go back to 1992 around union station becoming a transit center during the same years Dave was in college outside of KC. So the "as long" part goes to Chastain.
Is making a continual effort over 25+ years more or less hard work than someone putting in a ton of effort in less time? That's really tough to argue either way. Remember, a Chastain plan was the first one to pass an election and the only citywide pass so far so he produced some success even if his methods are bad.
Dave's approach is clearly better and that's what should be recognized. He provided way more value to the city regardless of who the winner is of any "mine is bigger" contest.
Here's a story why getting stuck on quantity misses the point of providing value.
https://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?s ... f_Code.txt
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Chastain’s efforts led the city to put the 2009 ballot item up with the KCATA. Their plan was better but he did show people wanted rail, it was the funding that was the issue.
This is a clear precursor to the TDD efforts. This effort took the lessons learned and came up with a winning method of financing with the TDD model and did it in a smart way. The free ballot signing events are the genius of the process and this selfless giving up of time is worthy of respect.
Chastains efforts really became crazy bad only after the city threw out his plan that passed. He did that 1990s recall attempt but it looks like the city refused to put petitions on the ballot then so he’s someone validated there. His name wasn’t so bad in 2008 that a majority was against it. That wasn’t true 5 years later.
It’s only about the time he left KC that his efforts went off the rails completely.
This is a clear precursor to the TDD efforts. This effort took the lessons learned and came up with a winning method of financing with the TDD model and did it in a smart way. The free ballot signing events are the genius of the process and this selfless giving up of time is worthy of respect.
Chastains efforts really became crazy bad only after the city threw out his plan that passed. He did that 1990s recall attempt but it looks like the city refused to put petitions on the ballot then so he’s someone validated there. His name wasn’t so bad in 2008 that a majority was against it. That wasn’t true 5 years later.
It’s only about the time he left KC that his efforts went off the rails completely.
- Highlander
- City Center Square
- Posts: 10233
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Actually, Clay started off pretty badly right out of the gates. He opposed the bistate plan for Union Station offering another plan that did not get on the ballot and then tried to overturn bistate vote at a later date. At this point, most people in area had already had enough of Chastain.flyingember wrote:Chastain’s efforts led the city to put the 2009 ballot item up with the KCATA. Their plan was better but he did show people wanted rail, it was the funding that was the issue.
This is a clear precursor to the TDD efforts. This effort took the lessons learned and came up with a winning method of financing with the TDD model and did it in a smart way. The free ballot signing events are the genius of the process and this selfless giving up of time is worthy of respect.
Chastains efforts really became crazy bad only after the city threw out his plan that passed. He did that 1990s recall attempt but it looks like the city refused to put petitions on the ballot then so he’s someone validated there. His name wasn’t so bad in 2008 that a majority was against it. That wasn’t true 5 years later.
It’s only about the time he left KC that his efforts went off the rails completely.