bahua wrote: So, then you don't rescind your comparison of Kaufman and Fenway?
I already stated my opinion on that.
bahua wrote: So, then you don't rescind your comparison of Kaufman and Fenway?
ESPN.com did compare Fenway to Kauffman and Kauffman scored higher. Its score tied with Wrigley.JJack_44 wrote: I really dont think you can compare Fenway and Kaufman. I think most people in the world like Fenway much better. I personaly like The K better.
Especially after seeing the situation at almost every other ballpark, and knowing we're stuck with this.trailerkid wrote: Tosspot's pic of the sports complex says it all in such a brutal and uncomprising way...there is no argument after see that design abortion.
Have you been to Seattle and seen their stadium? I have and while I didn't attend a game I can say with out a doubt that there's a lot of life around it. I don't think that's a strong argument...im2kull wrote: The last time I checked, we werent the only city to F up the location. Look at seattle, they did theirs in the equivelent of our west bottoms. LMAO. And look, no development, only bars. Maybe someone should remove that picture from the above pictures and quit comparing the K to crap like that. Just my .02
Um, what? Bars are development.im2kull wrote: And look, no development, only bars.
There is also a Denny's.Michael® wrote: TSC's cultural, entertainment and retail center, Taco Bell, is easily visible and accessible from anywhere near the complex.
Dallas???KC_JAYHAWK wrote: There's nothing wrong with the K, only the team that's on the field day in and day out. A new stadium would not fix that. Not every city has a downtown ballpark, but is still triving......look at Dallas as an example. Their baseball stadium (built I believe in the mid-90's) is in Arlington....not exactly downtown. With the Sprint Center, PAC, and P&L District, downtown KC will do just fine...believe me. With the way the Royals are playing, a new downtown ballpark wouldn't attract any more visitors and thus would just be a drain on the city and taxpayers.....just my humble opinion.
Yea, ok, but....KC_JAYHAWK wrote: There's nothing wrong with the K, only the team that's on the field day in and day out. A new stadium would not fix that. Not every city has a downtown ballpark, but is still triving......look at Dallas as an example. Their baseball stadium (built I believe in the mid-90's) is in Arlington....not exactly downtown. With the Sprint Center, PAC, and P&L District, downtown KC will do just fine...believe me. With the way the Royals are playing, a new downtown ballpark wouldn't attract any more visitors and thus would just be a drain on the city and taxpayers.....just my humble opinion.