OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
But why? It doesn’t impact residents, pedestrians, cyclists, or transit users.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34010
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
It's obvious trying to "get back" at all the criticism of 1/2/3 Light.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
I mean I get that it doesn’t look great for drivers but it’s a cost that only benefits the passing driver looking 90 degrees from the road.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 9:29 am It's obvious trying to "get back" at all the criticism of 1/2/3 Light.
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
You’re right.normalthings wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 9:25 am But why? It doesn’t impact residents, pedestrians, cyclists, or transit users.
It only impacts the reputation of the building and developer as 10’s of thousands of people will see this as their first and only impression.
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
Lmao - pathetic. Seriously. I can’t ask a question without an insult or something about Cordish being tossed in my face.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 9:29 am It's obvious trying to "get back" at all the criticism of 1/2/3 Light.
This isn’t personal, I was only asking a question. Why or who would I be “getting back at”? Is there a person on here with close ties to this developer?
Noted, don’t ask any questions because apparently I’m only asking due to some vendetta I have.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
How many people look at it and see North Point or expect a roof to not look like a roof?DColeKC wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 10:05 amYou’re right.normalthings wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 9:25 am But why? It doesn’t impact residents, pedestrians, cyclists, or transit users.
It only impacts the reputation of the building and developer as 10’s of thousands of people will see this as their first and only impression.
Even if they do care, it’s a stick built developer building a stick on slab apartment. Not held to the high standards of luxury towers
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
I think a simple observation has gone off the rails into some previous pissing match rekindled. In just looking at the photos, I see the question of looking at the rooves & seeing the HVAC stuff while on the bridge. Would it have been nice to have a facade or something extended on the roofline to hide those? Sure. Was it required, most likely not as it was mentioned these were basically slab build suburban style 5-6 story max height apartment complexes.
Living in the suburbs I can't say I have really paid much attention or noticed things like that in the past. Plus I drive over the HOA bridge almost everyday on my way home from work (work downtown, live in Briarcliff)
Living in the suburbs I can't say I have really paid much attention or noticed things like that in the past. Plus I drive over the HOA bridge almost everyday on my way home from work (work downtown, live in Briarcliff)
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
that said I would like to see some more High rise building with maybe a touch for design flare then what they have put up thus far. Nothing too tall or crazy but give me something I little different to look at. It look slike a subdivision where there are 4 designs to choose from and everything looks the same. I get lost in those type neighborhoods
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34010
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
Happy Friday DCole! Let's make the next riverfront development building taller than HOA and we'll not have to worry about this. I'm fine adding this particular observation to the list of things done poorly at the riverfront.
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
Thank you for a rational response. I'll try and be more careful with my words next time and avoid posting on the Rag when stopped at red lights.dukuboy1 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 10:28 am I think a simple observation has gone off the rails into some previous pissing match rekindled. In just looking at the photos, I see the question of looking at the rooves & seeing the HVAC stuff while on the bridge. Would it have been nice to have a facade or something extended on the roofline to hide those? Sure. Was it required, most likely not as it was mentioned these were basically slab build suburban style 5-6 story max height apartment complexes.
Living in the suburbs I can't say I have really paid much attention or noticed things like that in the past. Plus I drive over the HOA bridge almost everyday on my way home from work (work downtown, live in Briarcliff)
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
Finally, we have some middle ground!KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 10:39 am Happy Friday DCole! Let's make the next riverfront development building taller than HOA and we'll not have to worry about this. I'm fine adding this particular observation to the list of things done poorly at the riverfront.
- AlkaliAxel
- Broadway Square
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:58 pm
- Location: West Plaza
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
DCole vs Powercat rivalry continues to be my fav thing on Rag.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34010
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
hopefully he takes it like I do, purely entertainment. No real drama on the rag.
- Cratedigger
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
The Port Authority of Kansas City has chosen Cushman & Wakefield to take over property management of Berkley Riverfront.
- AlkaliAxel
- Broadway Square
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:58 pm
- Location: West Plaza
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
What needs to happen is open up the floor of T-Mobile center and sell tickets for wrestling match between "Powercat & DCole" and the winner gets to choose whether 4L goes at the retail site or the movie theatre site.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 1:21 pm hopefully he takes it like I do, purely entertainment. No real drama on the rag.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34010
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
I just want to pick the glass (j/k I've never posted once about the glass on the # Lights)
- FangKC
- City Hall
- Posts: 18205
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
No, the site should be chosen by a chimp throwing ping pong balls into labeled cups.
- AlkaliAxel
- Broadway Square
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:58 pm
- Location: West Plaza
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
I still have never understood what the big deal is about the glass. It looks nice.
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
The only roof that needs criticism and something done about it is the Pershing Square building next to Union Station. It yuks up the tourist view from the Liberty Memorial.
- Anthony_Hugo98
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS
Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project
My dream is to become successful enough in life to buy that building outright just to get rid of it…
That or at least do something to make it not ruin the view as much from LM, probably residential conversion