May as well close Grand. Every time I'm in KC it's closed for no reason lol. It's kind of weird. Main street in the middle of a major city just closed with no cars or people around. Very odd.
Capping the Loop
Re: Capping the Loop
Re: Capping the Loop
Re: Capping the Loop
I mean isn't Grand a major city bus route? That has to make catching a bus downtown a real PITA.
Re: Capping the Loop
Re: Capping the Loop
Seriously, sigh. I give up.
It's the consultification and hold studies until all the neighbors get anything interesting removed. Everything new is old again. Whatever.
Re: Capping the Loop
I'm not saying I disagree with you on closing some of the streets. I was only saying Grand seems to be closed all the time anyway.WoodDraw wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:04 amSeriously, sigh. I give up.
It's the consultification and hold studies until all the neighbors get anything interesting removed. Everything new is old again. Whatever.
They need to stop closing Grand though if they do want to close some of the other north/south streets across 670.
Re: Capping the Loop
My sigh wasn't directed at you. I agree with you. On grand and the rest.GRID wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:08 amI'm not saying I disagree with you on closing some of the streets. I was only saying Grand seems to be closed all the time anyway.
They need to stop closing Grand though if they do want to close some of the other north/south streets across 670.
Re: Capping the Loop
Gotcha, I guess your post was full of general frustration with the Grand closings haha.WoodDraw wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:19 amMy sigh wasn't directed at you. I agree with you. On grand and the rest.
Re: Capping the Loop
That grand is just randomly closed at any time and no one really seems to know why or if there are rules. Or cares.
But we try to create a park and hntb is like after a million dollar study and multiple hearings, we've decided nothing should change. And everyone is like oh, hmm, that makes sense.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm
Re: Capping the Loop
I can't believe they are fighting this hard to keep Baltimore open. That street hardly gets any traffic. But I guess it's more important to please the 5 cars a day that pass through Baltimore than having an just *one* uninterrupted section of the park by cars.
The park was good. It won't even be a park if the entire thing becomes a street grid.
The park was good. It won't even be a park if the entire thing becomes a street grid.
Re: Capping the Loop
so much pessimism around this and what could be cool. I'm just done with it. KC has been burned so many times, makes folks on boards like this just feel likes it's another "pissing in the wind" type project. I hope it works out and I think the idea/concept is solid. I'm all for every ounce development we can invest into downtown.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34027
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Capping the Loop
I don't see much problem closing Baltimore. Any fear I've voiced of closing any street has zero to do with any car first mentally. It has everything to do with protecting streetcar headways and the already all too often closing of grand which basically takes it out of any traffic flow, which will become a bigger thing once royals are downtown
- Cratedigger
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm
Re: Capping the Loop
Wow I'm shocked at the negativity here. This seems like the one project that KC/MO really seems to be moving on and putting $$$ towards in a way that will happen in the next 5 years
Re: Capping the Loop
Agreed. I think the cities stance was to see a traffic study first. The random Grand closures and a few T-Mobile events need to be included in that to be worth anything. The Royals stadium has me slightly less concerned since I recall Sherman saying if they were to do EV, then the freeway access on the east loop would need to be reexamined.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:56 am I don't see much problem closing Baltimore. Any fear I've voiced of closing any street has zero to do with any car first mentally. It has everything to do with protecting streetcar headways and the already all too often closing of grand which basically takes it out of any traffic flow, which will become a bigger thing once royals are downtown
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm
Re: Capping the Loop
Agreed, but this seems to happen with every project. Everyone wants it and then when it gets going people sour on it and say “wasted opportunity” or something.Cratedigger wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:28 pm Wow I'm shocked at the negativity here. This seems like the one project that KC/MO really seems to be moving on and putting $$$ towards in a way that will happen in the next 5 years
Obviously, even if they don’t close any roads, this will be massively better than the current state. Still very exciting so I don’t get it.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34027
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Capping the Loop
Right but the oak and pnl garages will be used too which would put traffic on grand I'm guessing.KC_Ari wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:47 pmAgreed. I think the cities stance was to see a traffic study first. The random Grand closures and a few T-Mobile events need to be included in that to be worth anything. The Royals stadium has me slightly less concerned since I recall Sherman saying if they were to do EV, then the freeway access on the east loop would need to be reexamined.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:56 am I don't see much problem closing Baltimore. Any fear I've voiced of closing any street has zero to do with any car first mentally. It has everything to do with protecting streetcar headways and the already all too often closing of grand which basically takes it out of any traffic flow, which will become a bigger thing once royals are downtown
- beautyfromashes
- One Park Place
- Posts: 7290
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am
Re: Capping the Loop
Maybe you both know something I don’t, but I don’t remember anyone writing a check or even a grand announcement from the city that this was a go. We’ve had some groups submit some proposals, but that means nothing. What did I miss that makes you both so confident in what this park will be besides someone with a planning program staying late at work killing time because they hate their home life?TheUrbanRoo wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:13 pmAgreed, but this seems to happen with every project. Everyone wants it and then when it gets going people sour on it and say “wasted opportunity” or something.Cratedigger wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:28 pm Wow I'm shocked at the negativity here. This seems like the one project that KC/MO really seems to be moving on and putting $$$ towards in a way that will happen in the next 5 years
Obviously, even if they don’t close any roads, this will be massively better than the current state. Still very exciting so I don’t get it.
Re: Capping the Loop
And the not-often-discussed potential for private sector abuse of this new space. It will be managed by a private nonprofit, with heavy control by Cordish/Loews. What could go wrong? (See also the park atop Cosentino's garage)KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:56 am I don't see much problem closing Baltimore. Any fear I've voiced of closing any street has zero to do with any car first mentally. It has everything to do with protecting streetcar headways and the already all too often closing of grand which basically takes it out of any traffic flow, which will become a bigger thing once royals are downtown
I personally think it should be managed by private nonprofit given the location (too many issues to expect KCMO Parks to keep control), that sentiment just doesn't extend to the streets. (See also Westport sidewalks)
Re: Capping the Loop
The streetcar headways are bs though. I take it every day and the lights never work. It's always stops at a red light for no one to cross. It then gets a green light and immediately stops to pick up passengers, backing up the street behind it. It has beg lights the entire way. The design is terrible.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:56 am I don't see much problem closing Baltimore. Any fear I've voiced of closing any street has zero to do with any car first mentally. It has everything to do with protecting streetcar headways and the already all too often closing of grand which basically takes it out of any traffic flow, which will become a bigger thing once royals are downtown
You can also design to lead traffic away from main, something we should be doing already.
Is this how we design?
Sometimes when you design new things you have to change things. Like let's challenge our thinking of what the city should be.
Last edited by WoodDraw on Fri May 26, 2023 1:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Capping the Loop
So Truman changes plus stop closing grand.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 1:27 pmRight but the oak and pnl garages will be used too which would put traffic on grand I'm guessing.KC_Ari wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 12:47 pmAgreed. I think the cities stance was to see a traffic study first. The random Grand closures and a few T-Mobile events need to be included in that to be worth anything. The Royals stadium has me slightly less concerned since I recall Sherman saying if they were to do EV, then the freeway access on the east loop would need to be reexamined.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri May 26, 2023 11:56 am I don't see much problem closing Baltimore. Any fear I've voiced of closing any street has zero to do with any car first mentally. It has everything to do with protecting streetcar headways and the already all too often closing of grand which basically takes it out of any traffic flow, which will become a bigger thing once royals are downtown