Page 6 of 11
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:36 pm
by GRID
AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:32 pm
This is the most underrated exciting project on the horizon
They will want incentives though, so may be a tough sell for KCMO city hall.
Speaking of city hall there. All of them should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
Even with subsidies, those projects are better for the city than northland sprawl.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 5:43 pm
by Anthony_Hugo98
GRID wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:36 pm
AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:32 pm
This is the most underrated exciting project on the horizon
They will want incentives though, so may be a tough sell for KCMO city hall.
Speaking of city hall there. All of them should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
Even with subsidies, those projects are better for the city than northland sprawl.
I’m glad that everyone here watches the same YouTubers
it makes communicating these ideas easier
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:33 pm
by daGOAT
GRID wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:36 pm
AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:32 pm
This is the most underrated exciting project on the horizon
They will want incentives though, so may be a tough sell for KCMO city hall.
Speaking of city hall there. All of them should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
Even with subsidies, those projects are better for the city than northland sprawl.
Maybe we'll get lucky with the election. I really like a handful of the candidates and think we may have a less hostile and uninformed pov from the council chambers soon.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:41 pm
by Cratedigger
daGOAT wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:33 pm
GRID wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:36 pm
AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:32 pm
This is the most underrated exciting project on the horizon
They will want incentives though, so may be a tough sell for KCMO city hall.
Speaking of city hall there. All of them should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
Even with subsidies, those projects are better for the city than northland sprawl.
Maybe we'll get lucky with the election. I really like a handful of the candidates and think we may have a less hostile and uninformed pov from the council chambers soon.
Which candidates? Is there an urbanist voting guide somewhere out there for KCMO?
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:58 pm
by daGOAT
freedog wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:41 pm
daGOAT wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:33 pm
GRID wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:36 pm
They will want incentives though, so may be a tough sell for KCMO city hall.
Speaking of city hall there. All of them should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
Even with subsidies, those projects are better for the city than northland sprawl.
Maybe we'll get lucky with the election. I really like a handful of the candidates and think we may have a less hostile and uninformed pov from the council chambers soon.
Which candidates? Is there an urbanist voting guide somewhere out there for KCMO?
Lol well Michael Kelley for 5th and Justin Short for 4th are great options for starters. Justin Short specifically is extremely pro development.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 5:53 pm
by DaveKCMO
Wait until they have to vote.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2022 11:13 pm
by normalthings
daGOAT wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 8:33 pm
GRID wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:36 pm
AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Tue Mar 08, 2022 4:32 pm
This is the most underrated exciting project on the horizon
They will want incentives though, so may be a tough sell for KCMO city hall.
Speaking of city hall there. All of them should watch this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI
Even with subsidies, those projects are better for the city than northland sprawl.
Maybe we'll get lucky with the election. I really like a handful of the candidates and think we may have a less hostile and uninformed pov from the council chambers soon.
More hostile candidates are in the race. Too early to tell
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:44 pm
by normalthings
Could be an artifact but google earth seems to show the unoccupied building south of the autoshop has a collapsing roof.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2022 5:02 pm
by AlkaliAxel
Damn it. I got excited clicking on this thread because there was news on it.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2022 7:18 am
by longviewmo
normalthings wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:44 pm
Could be an artifact but google earth seems to show the unoccupied building south of the autoshop has a collapsing roof.
Streetview shows the brick missing up top on a portion of the south side, which also seems indicative of a lack of support.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2022 9:18 pm
by Eon Blue
normalthings wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:44 pm
Could be an artifact but google earth seems to show the unoccupied building south of the autoshop has a collapsing roof.
We need a ragger to take one for the team and book a north-facing room in the Hampton Inn.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:38 pm
by Anthony_Hugo98
Eon Blue wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 9:18 pm
normalthings wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:44 pm
Could be an artifact but google earth seems to show the unoccupied building south of the autoshop has a collapsing roof.
We need a ragger to take one for the team and book a north-facing room in the Hampton Inn.
I have an extension ladder in my work truck worst case
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 3:20 am
by WoodDraw
I probably have a view from rooftops I have access to. I'll look and see
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2022 7:47 pm
by normalthings
further review shows cracks spreading across the front facade. Not good!
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:32 pm
by Chris Stritzel
The old building next to Calvert’s is being demolished today after an apparent fire last night (based on Twitter). The situation has resulted in Streetcar service being suspended since yesterday evening.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 10:42 am
by DColeKC
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 10:55 am
by Cratedigger
According to a project timeline submitted with its incentive application in April 2021, Cordish and Sky Real Estate had anticipated their project would start construction in the third or fourth quarter of 2022, with project completion between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the second quarter of 2026.
The parties have not filed a project plan since submitting the incentive application in 2021.
And here we are in Q4 of 2022. I'm guessing we don't hear about any movement on this until after the South Loop Cap funding is announced.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 11:39 am
by DColeKC
Cratedigger wrote: ↑Tue Dec 06, 2022 10:55 am
According to a project timeline submitted with its incentive application in April 2021, Cordish and Sky Real Estate had anticipated their project would start construction in the third or fourth quarter of 2022, with project completion between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the second quarter of 2026.
The parties have not filed a project plan since submitting the incentive application in 2021.
And here we are in Q4 of 2022. I'm guessing we don't hear about any movement on this until after the South Loop Cap funding is announced.
I can't think of a development that's ever happened when they say it will happen. I do know this project is next over any new residential project for Cordish. At 500+ apartments I'd have to assume this is going to be a very tall building even with 375sqft studio apartments.
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 11:58 am
by normalthings
Next before 4 Light?
Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2022 1:41 pm
by DColeKC
normalthings wrote: ↑Tue Dec 06, 2022 11:58 am
Next before 4 Light?
Yes.