$115 billion to modernize the bridges, highways and roads that are in the worst shape. The White House outline estimated 20,000 miles (32,187 kilometers) of roadways would be repaired, while economically significant bridges and 10,000 smaller bridges would get fixed.
- $85 billion for public transit, doubling the federal government's commitment in an effort to shorten the repair backlog and expand service.
- $80 billion to modernize Amtrak's heavily trafficked Northeast Corridor line, address its repair backlog and improve freight rail.
- $174 billion to build 500,000 electric vehicle charging stations, electrify 20% of school buses and electrify the federal fleet, including U.S. Postal Service vehicles.
- $25 billion to upgrade air travel and airports and $17 billion for waterways and coastal ports.
- $20 billion to redress communities whose neighborhoods - typically nonwhite - were divided by highway projects.
- $18 billion to modernize Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics, and $10 billion for federal buildings.
Infrastructure Stimulus
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Infrastructure Stimulus
https://abc7news.com/joe-biden-infrastr ... /10462634/
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
I hope "expand service" means allowing federal funds to be used for operating expense, like what was done for the three COVID relief bills. Agencies won't add service if they can't afford to maintain it long term (we are in this category).
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Will KC pursue a highway justice fund project?
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
I hope so. There are at least four I can think of off the top of my head:
US-71 through the east side
North Loop
South Loop
I-35 through Westside
Lots of business and resident displacement for each.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
US-71 would make for a beautiful linear park. Disconnect 71 from the freeways on the south side and turn it into a city boulevard for the remainder.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
This portion of the bill looks appealing, still not sure why only 25% of the 2 trillion is actually dedicated to Infrastructure though.normalthings wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 11:38 am https://abc7news.com/joe-biden-infrastr ... /10462634/$115 billion to modernize the bridges, highways and roads that are in the worst shape. The White House outline estimated 20,000 miles (32,187 kilometers) of roadways would be repaired, while economically significant bridges and 10,000 smaller bridges would get fixed.
- $85 billion for public transit, doubling the federal government's commitment in an effort to shorten the repair backlog and expand service.
- $80 billion to modernize Amtrak's heavily trafficked Northeast Corridor line, address its repair backlog and improve freight rail.
- $174 billion to build 500,000 electric vehicle charging stations, electrify 20% of school buses and electrify the federal fleet, including U.S. Postal Service vehicles.
- $25 billion to upgrade air travel and airports and $17 billion for waterways and coastal ports.
- $20 billion to redress communities whose neighborhoods - typically nonwhite - were divided by highway projects.
- $18 billion to modernize Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics, and $10 billion for federal buildings.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Last I checked, housing, education, research and development weren't considerd infrastructure projects. I'm not 100% opposed to improving those areas, but I'm a little worried about rising taxes in order to accomplish this. Perhaps the bill should be split into 2 different bills?
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
You must be new to how government works. The only way to pass some bills is to add something certain people want into it.
Split it in two and if everything they want is in bill 1 they need to be given a reason to vote for bill 2.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Lol. I'm not new to how government works. I understand they slip a ton of bullshit pet projects into a bill that has some majority support. Just saying, there's billions of dollars dedicated to non-basic infrastructure projects in this act.flyingember wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 3:21 pmYou must be new to how government works. The only way to pass some bills is to add something certain people want into it.
Split it in two and if everything they want is in bill 1 they need to be given a reason to vote for bill 2.
- FangKC
- City Hall
- Posts: 18233
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
The transportation portion of the infrastructure bill alone is 42 percent. When you add in the water projects, dams, flood control, electrical grid, adding electrical charging stations nationwide, wind, solar, battery investment, energy efficiency, broadband, housing, etc, it's much more than the 25 percent. Infrastructure is more than highways and bridges.
I've read that our electrical grid alone is one of our greatest weaknesses as a country -- not only to blackouts like in Texas, but national defense. Any adversary could easily take down our electrical grid.
One of the most pro-active civil defense projects that we could ever do would be to incentivize every household to have a back-up electric-storage battery. In fact, if most people had one electric car, one can run basic household needs off the car batteries in a pinch.
Economists say that the benefit of the spending is that much of it goes back directly into our economy through wages and worker spending creating big multiplier effect.
I've read that our electrical grid alone is one of our greatest weaknesses as a country -- not only to blackouts like in Texas, but national defense. Any adversary could easily take down our electrical grid.
One of the most pro-active civil defense projects that we could ever do would be to incentivize every household to have a back-up electric-storage battery. In fact, if most people had one electric car, one can run basic household needs off the car batteries in a pinch.
Economists say that the benefit of the spending is that much of it goes back directly into our economy through wages and worker spending creating big multiplier effect.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Conservative talking point excludes transit and Amtrak from the definition of infrastructure.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Why must Amtrak make a profit and highways not? Does the FAA recoup all monies through fees for the BILLIONs they dole out? How about port infrastructure?
but you know this, this conversation has been had before on here, elsewhere. But no one updates their talking points. gets boring after awhile.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
If you understand why streetcar/ATA is free to ride, then you understand why Amtrak does not need to be profitable.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
lol @ "bailing out" Amtrak
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
I don't have an electric car, but that comment just presented the conflicting scenario in my mind if I did... a foreign adversary causes the electrical grid to go down; my Tesla is fully charged but my freezer is full of pandemic emergency meals; I'm really low on dog food; my elderly mom lives alone, 30 miles away; the patriots have just breached the Capital again and hung AOC; my phone and laptop are not fully charged and I'm out of beer. WTF do I do?FangKC wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 8:11 pm I've read that our electrical grid alone is one of our greatest weaknesses as a country -- not only to blackouts like in Texas, but national defense. Any adversary could easily take down our electrical grid.
One of the most pro-active civil defense projects that we could ever do would be to incentivize every household to have a back-up electric-storage battery. In fact, if most people had one electric car, one can run basic household needs off the car batteries in a pinch.
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Amtrak has lost money almost every single year it’s been in existence. It’s been given well over 35 billion in bailouts and for years, this was because it was run like a complete shit show. Not sure if it’s still true, but years ago more people flew on private planes per year than rode on Amtrak.
How far could we be with high speed rail at this point with all these billions and how much longer are we going to give a few billion per year to an already federally subsidized company to cover their losses?
Re: Infrastructure Stimulus
Sorry, I’ve never seen these conversations happening. So new to me.kboish wrote: ↑Fri Apr 02, 2021 9:10 amWhy must Amtrak make a profit and highways not? Does the FAA recoup all monies through fees for the BILLIONs they dole out? How about port infrastructure?
but you know this, this conversation has been had before on here, elsewhere. But no one updates their talking points. gets boring after awhile.
Highways aren’t a quasi-public corporation and our tax dollars are already paying for the upkeep. The amount of people using highways and commercial aviation is astronomically greater than those using Amtrak. Amtrak’s not transporting goods in and out of the country either. So I don’t understand the comparison.
Let’s stop pumping money into an antiquated, dying form of transportation and put that money into future improvements like high speed rail that could actually compete with other popular forms of transportation. Amtrak is a joke. Not to be confused with local rail and streetcar systems which are a huge plus for communities.