Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Discuss items in the urban core outside of Downtown as described above. Everything in the core including the east side (18th & Vine area), Northeast, Plaza, Westport, Brookside, Valentine, Waldo, 39th street, & the entire midtown area.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

Cratedigger wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:39 pm
msmith011 wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:09 pm Looks like Dillard's may be moving ahead with a Plaza store: https://www.construction.com/projects/d ... club-plaza

I don't know how credible this filing is, but I wouldn't be surprised if true.
I would hope that the city/Taubman are using this opportunity to review the plan for the site. It's a fantastic location for adding apartments on top of retail while still keeping the concept of the plaza bowl alive. However, if this site is accurate and the valuation is 15-25 million it would not appear they are doing anything more than the store.
If you get the store opportunty on that lot though you take it. I'm not keen on rolling the dice on Plaza apartments. Many of them never happen.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by normalthings »

Multiple developers have tried to pitch residential for this site. All shot down by the land owner.

Breaking up the Plaza only works if the city/neighborhood would approve redevelopment in the first place (they won't)
User avatar
Cratedigger
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Cratedigger »

normalthings wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:52 pm Multiple developers have tried to pitch residential for this site. All shot down by the land owner.

Breaking up the Plaza only works if the city/neighborhood would approve redevelopment in the first place (they won't)
I believe this and I hate it. You'd hope that you could sell this site more than many others (vacant lot already, doesn't interrupt the traditional plaza feel since it is on the fringe, double digit storied buildings on the street already)

Oh well, I just want this site filled honestly. It looks like the plaza is missing a tooth everytime I'm down there
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5523
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by moderne »

Hope its a full line department store, which the central city needs somewhere. Maybe this will get something moving residential wise on the vacant site next to the Cancer Survivors Park.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

Cratedigger wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:54 pm
normalthings wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:52 pm Multiple developers have tried to pitch residential for this site. All shot down by the land owner.

Breaking up the Plaza only works if the city/neighborhood would approve redevelopment in the first place (they won't)
I believe this and I hate it. You'd hope that you could sell this site more than many others (vacant lot already, doesn't interrupt the traditional plaza feel since it is on the fringe, double digit storied buildings on the street already)

Oh well, I just want this site filled honestly. It looks like the plaza is missing a tooth everytime I'm down there
Yeah. I've been starting to give up on the Plaza recently. It's a really nice feature of the city, will have a great streetcar stop, but as far as it being a future rising star I'm losing hope.

On the flip side, the exact opposite should be said about Crossroads, Downtown, and the River Market. Perhaps even Midtown. And that matters alot more.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18215
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by FangKC »

I think it's a mistake not to add apartments over retail on this parcel. Why would one not take the opportunity?
Last edited by FangKC on Mon Jan 30, 2023 11:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
mgsports
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat May 31, 2008 7:00 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by mgsports »

Good could use one their if can't get like Mejier.
ehartkc
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:05 am

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by ehartkc »

FangKC wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:53 pm I think it's a mistake not to add apartments over retail on this parcel. Why would one not take the opportunity?
Agree. Seems like a no brainer.
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10208
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Highlander »

Cratedigger wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:39 pm
msmith011 wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 12:09 pm Looks like Dillard's may be moving ahead with a Plaza store: https://www.construction.com/projects/d ... club-plaza

I don't know how credible this filing is, but I wouldn't be surprised if true.
I would hope that the city/Taubman are using this opportunity to review the plan for the site. It's a fantastic location for adding apartments on top of retail while still keeping the concept of the plaza bowl alive. However, if this site is accurate and the valuation is 15-25 million it would not appear they are doing anything more than the store.
There is no address on the link. What site are we talking about? Is this the site that Nordstrom was going to build on?
FangKC wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 9:53 pm I think it's a mistake not to add apartments over retail on this parcel. Why would one not take the opportunity?
My guess would be that it adds complexity and potential delays to the deal and probably not deemed necessary or even desirable by the primary tenant. It's easier for a single entity to forge a deal with the owners, construction contractors etc....
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18215
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by FangKC »

How the Country Club Plaza’s new manager plans to revitalize it

https://kansascitymag.com/news/business ... talize-it/
empires228
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:23 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by empires228 »

Godspeed to Dillard’s to succeed in a part of the metro where they’ve already closed up shop five times…
MidtownCat
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1930
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: ~Westwood~

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by MidtownCat »

empires228 wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:11 pm Godspeed to Dillard’s to succeed in a part of the metro where they’ve already closed up shop five times…
A mediocre big box clothing retailer found in every run of the mill mall in America is such a joke for the Plaza. Give me a break. Dillards? Dillards? That honestly the best we can do?

We’ve gone from Saks, Halls, Mark Shale…to Dillards.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17173
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by GRID »

It's funny how people still describe the plaza as being upscale. It's VERY far from being an upscale shopping area. Does KC really even have upscale shopping anywhere? I mean most people think fashion there is wearing sports paraphernalia and that's all people seem to buy/wear there.

The plaza just needs to become an urban neighborhood and stop pretending to be something it isn't. And that means Dillard's is fine so long as they can survive as a company. It's just too bad that it's not part of a mixed use development with residential. The core of the plaza desperately need residential.

Stop calling the plaza upscale and people won't be so disappointed in it. It's not even in the same universe as something like "Rodeo Drive of the midwest." which I have heard many times.

It's a pleasant urban area with interesting architecture. The plaza needs more people living there and it should become a dining destination if they would just widen the sidewalks along Nichols for outdoor cafes etc.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

GRID wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:29 am Stop calling the plaza upscale and people won't be so disappointed in it. It's not even in the same universe as something like "Rodeo Drive of the midwest." which I have heard many times.
It's not necessarily the most luxurious shopping in the Midwest but it might be the coolest one other than Michigan Ave
MidtownCat
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1930
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: ~Westwood~

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by MidtownCat »

UMKC Roo wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:19 am
GRID wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:29 am Stop calling the plaza upscale and people won't be so disappointed in it. It's not even in the same universe as something like "Rodeo Drive of the midwest." which I have heard many times.
It's not necessarily the most luxurious shopping in the Midwest but it might be the coolest one other than Michigan Ave
Used to be.
User avatar
Cratedigger
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Cratedigger »

UMKC Roo wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 4:19 am
GRID wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:29 am Stop calling the plaza upscale and people won't be so disappointed in it. It's not even in the same universe as something like "Rodeo Drive of the midwest." which I have heard many times.
It's not necessarily the most luxurious shopping in the Midwest but it might be the coolest one other than Michigan Ave
Could be.

Grid any luxury spots seem to have dipped out to Town Center or elsewhere in South JoCo. *ducks to avoid getting caught in the anti JoCo crossfire*

It’s frustrating - Dillard’s is such a step down. For the life of me I can’t understand how there’s not a better concept this location can attract. Like a spot for small stalls and pop up food concepts like NYC’s Chelsea Market (which could give new and/or local concepts a plaza area space for cheaper). Hell, it’d be better if a neighborhood amenity like a grocery store went here than a mid-lower tier big box department store.
empires228
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 286
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:23 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by empires228 »

MidtownCat wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:22 am
empires228 wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 3:11 pm Godspeed to Dillard’s to succeed in a part of the metro where they’ve already closed up shop five times…
A mediocre big box clothing retailer found in every run of the mill mall in America is such a joke for the Plaza. Give me a break. Dillards? Dillards? That honestly the best we can do?

We’ve gone from Saks, Halls, Mark Shale…to Dillards.
And what makes them think it will work this time? They already couldn’t make it work at The Landing, Ward Parkway Center, downtown Mission, downtown KCMO, and the Plaza itself. We’ve also had two Macy’s stores bail on the Mission Hills/Country Club/Leawood demographic in the past decade. The demographic very obviously doesn’t want a run of the mill department store. Judging by the decline of upper end offerings at Oak Park Mall they obviously don’t go there anymore than they go to the Plaza.
Last edited by empires228 on Fri Feb 03, 2023 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10208
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Highlander »

GRID wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:29 am It's a pleasant urban area with interesting architecture. The plaza needs more people living there and it should become a dining destination if they would just widen the sidewalks along Nichols for outdoor cafes etc.
Kind of odd that there are no restaurants on Nichols Road other than Tuscan Brio. It's the least restaurant-oriented street on the Plaza. It would be great if more were there and had outside patios. Multiple generations of owners have failed to recognize some of the benefits of making the Plaza a true Plaza and more pedestrian friendly.

I suspect the restaurant owners want more visible locations to be seen by the driving public which is why there are so few restaurants in the interior.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17173
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by GRID »

Highlander wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 12:29 pm
GRID wrote: Fri Feb 03, 2023 2:29 am It's a pleasant urban area with interesting architecture. The plaza needs more people living there and it should become a dining destination if they would just widen the sidewalks along Nichols for outdoor cafes etc.
Kind of odd that there are no restaurants on Nichols Road other than Tuscan Brio. It's the least restaurant-oriented street on the Plaza. It would be great if more were there and had outside patios. Multiple generations of owners have failed to recognize some of the benefits of making the Plaza a true Plaza and more pedestrian friendly.

I suspect the restaurant owners want more visible locations to be seen by the driving public which is why there are so few restaurants in the interior.
It's odd that there are not many restaurants. I don't think they have to be on 47th to be visible. It's too bad there is nothing on there now or they could do what they do here in Annapolis and close Nichols on weekends. I have always said the plaza would be perfect for a European style restaurant district.

Here is West Street in Annapolis

Normal day:
Image

Weekends:
Image
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18215
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by FangKC »

Whatever gets built on the vacant lot the architects need to design some eye candy for the T intersection. When you have a terminating sightline like this, you need something extraordinary.

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.0413475 ... 384!8i8192

Examples of good T intersections.
'
https://www.google.com/maps/@39.1034212 ... 384!8i8192

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.102891 ... 384!8i8192
Post Reply