OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Talk about the ever expanding north side of KC.
User avatar
Beermo
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:55 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by Beermo »

'tonka. class of '81
Why is corporate welfare better than public socialism?


Veritas Nihilum Vincet.
WyCo
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 301
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:22 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by WyCo »

I would imagine being that close to Red X and their liquor department didn't help Rimmans any.    Red X does a really good job with their monthly wine tastings, and they have a huge selection.  Not the upscale atmosphere, but..........
McCabes by Village West did close.  Very nice facility, but with the Kansas liquor laws, boutique stores have a hard time.  No wine tastings, etc.
User avatar
QueSi2Opie
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3864
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 2:05 pm
Location: Hangin' with the cons, crazies, and crackheads on 11th & Grand.

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by QueSi2Opie »

Personally I think giving TIF's to Northland KC (south of Vivion Rd) are just as bad, or just as good, as giving TIF's to Overland Park (north of 87th St). Both areas have some blight, old rental property, abandoned strip malls, etc. However, I do realize that KC is a bigger monster than OP with a lot more blight issues to address (Eastside, parts of Midtown, and so on), but somebody has to be willing to invest in those areas first. Most people wouldn't risk it, PERIOD! That's why I think the city shouldn't be hesitating with the East Village and Bannister proposals.   

Other than that, TIF's south of Vivion aren't that terrible IMO if someone is willing to invest in new development.
The Pendergast Poltergeist Project!

I finally divorced beer and proposed to whiskey, but I occassionally cheat with fine wine.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by loftguy »

GRID wrote:
If I were a developer in KC right now.  I would pack my bags and bolt this city faster than shit.
It is happening.  True story.

And there are many more who are starting to look elsewhere.
User avatar
chrizow
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 17161
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:43 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by chrizow »

loftguy wrote: It is happening.  True story.

And there are many more who are starting to look elsewhere.
discuss.
User avatar
Beermo
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:55 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by Beermo »

loftguy wrote: It is happening.  True story.

And there are many more who are starting to look elsewhere.
great, someone finally turned off the tif tap.
Why is corporate welfare better than public socialism?


Veritas Nihilum Vincet.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17190
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by GRID »

chrizow wrote: discuss.
I personally know a developer that was going to do a project in downtown kc and now researching downtown st louis.  No way will I say who it is because I know some of you have to have "proof", but I am probably in touch with the development community as much as anybody on this forum and believe me.  KC has taken quite a turn in the past year as far as developers being pumped up and excited about taking a "risk" on KC.  It's not just the current mayor, or the economy, it's everything.  It's just they way the world turns I guess.
User avatar
chrizow
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 17161
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:43 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by chrizow »

is STL throwing around tax incentives a lot as well, or is it more "purely" market-based?
User avatar
Beermo
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:55 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by Beermo »

GRID wrote: I personally know a developer that was going to do a project in downtown kc and now researching downtown st louis.  No way will I say who it is because I know some of you have to have "proof", but I am probably in touch with the development community as much as anybody on this forum and believe me.  KC has taken quite a turn in the past year as far as developers being pumped up and excited about taking a "risk" on KC.  It's not just the current mayor, or the economy, it's everything.  It's just they way the world turns I guess.
nice safe post. congrats.
Why is corporate welfare better than public socialism?


Veritas Nihilum Vincet.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by DaveKCMO »

loftguy wrote: And there are many more who are starting to look elsewhere.
if they truly loved this town, like many claim, they wouldn't be so easily swayed by a bump in the real estate market.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by loftguy »

DaveKCMO wrote: if they truly loved this town, like many claim, they wouldn't be so easily swayed by a bump in the real estate market.
People in real estate development, who want to continue in development have to assess opportunities carefully.  One failure can end a career.

I love KCK, but in my assessment, viewing all the factors, the risk is too great for me to develop there.

To answer Chrizow from earlier, 3 developers have pulled in their horns and state it's the change in climate that caused them to look to other pastures. One was going to develop a crossroads building for his offices, the second was going to develop a River Market building into "affordable" condos (though there were a lot of challenges to that project, too), the third was a Denver housing developer looking for a larger renovation opportunity. 

Additionally, a long time, better known developer in downtown told me yesterday that "maybe I need to start looking at another town to develop in, this isn't all that much fun anymore".

I'm pissed.  I'm pissed that I read and hear news reports that say the world of real estate is in collapse, and I'm especially pissed that our mayor does not recognize his need to lead.  He can do much to alter the mood of our city by providing positive possibilities.(like the suggested speech that Fang provided in a thread earlier this week).

This change in public perception is not some fantasy cooked up by people who hate the Funk.  It's not developers creating a "he's out to get us" atmosphere.  It's a crisis that is not being handled by our head of the city, who appears to be adding to the creation of this scenario.

You will note that I have not said one thing about Funk through the many months he's been considered on this site.  I reserved my thoughts and have held out for him to come out with something positive for our city.  It's wearing thin, though.
User avatar
Beermo
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:55 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by Beermo »

it sucks real bad when they pull the rug out from under you and the freebies disappear.

i feel really bad for them. &&&
Why is corporate welfare better than public socialism?


Veritas Nihilum Vincet.
User avatar
justin8216
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:52 pm
Location: Kansas City

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by justin8216 »

loftguy wrote: People in real estate development, who want to continue in development have to assess opportunities carefully.  One failure can end a career.

I love KCK, but in my assessment, viewing all the factors, the risk is too great for me to develop there.

To answer Chrizow from earlier, 3 developers have pulled in their horns and state it's the change in climate that caused them to look to other pastures. One was going to develop a crossroads building for his offices, the second was going to develop a River Market building into "affordable" condos (though there were a lot of challenges to that project, too), the third was a Denver housing developer looking for a larger renovation opportunity. 

Additionally, a long time, better known developer in downtown told me yesterday that "maybe I need to start looking at another town to develop in, this isn't all that much fun anymore".

I'm pissed.  I'm pissed that I read and hear news reports that say the world of real estate is in collapse, and I'm especially pissed that our mayor does not recognize his need to lead.  He can do much to alter the mood of our city by providing positive possibilities.(like the suggested speech that Fang provided in a thread earlier this week).

This change in public perception is not some fantasy cooked up by people who hate the Funk.  It's not developers creating a "he's out to get us" atmosphere.  It's a crisis that is not being handled by our head of the city, who appears to be adding to the creation of this scenario.

You will note that I have not said one thing about Funk through the many months he's been considered on this site.  I reserved my thoughts and have held out for him to come out with something positive for our city.  It's wearing thin, though.
Leave it to the people of Kansas City, MO to elect someone like Funkhauser Mayor, who threatens to undo everything that the city has accomplished right after electing one of their greatest Mayors in history and certainly their greatest Mayor in recent history, Mayor Kay Barnes, who delivered the Sprint Arena, and the downtown entertainment district.

It seems like a pattern. One ineffective mayor, one effective mayor, one ineffective, one effective. Emanuel Cleaver, Kay Barnes, Mark Funkhauser and on it goes.
User avatar
Beermo
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2427
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 9:55 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by Beermo »

what about berkley and wheeler?
Why is corporate welfare better than public socialism?


Veritas Nihilum Vincet.
nota
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5725
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Northland (Parkville)

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by nota »

Interesting.

At a large gathering in my neighborhood last night, the topic turned to Riman's closing and Briarcliff Village in general.

The bottom line after all the businesses were bashed one by one is that BV is "elitist" and "I dont' want to shop at any elitist places."
Maitre D
The Quiet Chair
The Quiet Chair
Posts: 14070
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Sunny Johnson County

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by Maitre D »

Do they shop at the Plaza tho?

That's elitist isn't it?

most people who complain about elite places/events, are probably jealous they're not elite enough to go there/afford it.
[img width=472 height=40]http://media.kansascity.com/images/champions_blue.gif[/img]

"For 15 years...KU won every time. There was no rivalry" - Frank Martin
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17190
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by GRID »

There is a new tower up.  Looks to be about 9 floors.  This is the office building right?  The hotel is a different structure?
MoMan
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 779
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:31 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by MoMan »

according to the sign in front of the construction, this is (a very nice) office building.  i'm not sure where or when the hotel will start rising.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17190
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by GRID »

Image
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5537
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Post by moderne »

This is going to be very similar to the Lockton Valenecia office on the Plaza.  Would have liked something more contemporary  as a gateway to the city.
Post Reply