Film Row building threatened with demolition
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
Does the surface parking tax apply to the ground level of parking structures also? It should.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
smh wrote: What really grinds my gears, however, is that the city (according to Collison)has nothing in place to stop shit like this. Parking should be a separate zoning category or require a variance. The idea that you can still tear down an existing structure to replace it with parking is so ludicrous in a city as empty as ours that I can't figure out whether to laugh or scream. And with the streetcar coming in two blocks over (providing ready access to thousands of spaces) this is just more of Kansas City's one step forward, two step back approach to city building.
/rant
Last edited by chaglang on Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34033
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
How about build the garage on the site of the surface parking lot across the street. Could also scale it taller there as well.
- Midtownkid
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3003
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 4:27 pm
- Location: Roanoke, KCMO
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
I think they should build another underground garage under the whole part of that block across from the Kauffman Center (to the east, grassy lot).
She should get a much bigger plan together for the whole block, includes a new garage. Keep the old building, incorporating its facade into a new building perhaps. Build a new building or series of buildings on top of the new, shared garage. Otherwise we will be stuck with this garage and later will need even more parking for whatever gets built there in the future.
She should get a much bigger plan together for the whole block, includes a new garage. Keep the old building, incorporating its facade into a new building perhaps. Build a new building or series of buildings on top of the new, shared garage. Otherwise we will be stuck with this garage and later will need even more parking for whatever gets built there in the future.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
And they put a see-through girl right in front of it. If I were mayor of the Crossroads, whoever did that rendering would go to jail.KCPowercat wrote:I love in the rendering of the garage how they kept the razor wire fence on the property next to it. Always love how classy that looks.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
“...but if a building is not going to benefit the neighborhood, you need to have the best use,” Helzberg said.
And by "neighborhood", she means "Shirley Helzberg"
And by "neighborhood", she means "Shirley Helzberg"
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
Our lamenting this project aside, what practical steps are available stop the project? Or are we SOL?
- WinchesterMysteryHouse
- Colonnade
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:54 pm
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
That garage would essentially isolate 17th Street to the north from the 'Old Crossroads,' 18th and southward. Can we presume intent? Further suburbanization.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
how is there a parking problem?
I have yet to not find an on street spot within a block of that location.
I have yet to not find an on street spot within a block of that location.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
+1. I suppose you could say First Fridays, but even then I've never had trouble finding a spot--and the Kauffman garage ALWAYS has space.flyingember wrote:how is there a parking problem?
I have yet to not find an on street spot within a block of that location.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
This is truly absurd. How many millions of dollars did the city spend on a parking garage next to Webster House? It is extremely underutilized except on performance dates. Why can't Webster House validate for the structured parking next door?
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
I think we also need to move on past the idea that a 185 stall garage is something the Webster House needs because people don't want to walk. That seems like a red herring. The spaces in Webster are tiny, and I can't imagine a banquet bringing in that many people. I suspect that she's trying to make a buck by drawing people attending PAC events away from the PAC garage.
If the problem is mainly on nights that the PAC has two events, does anyone know how many nights a year that is? 10? 20? Showing that the Orion is being demolished so the Ladies Who Lunch won't be inconvenienced on, say, 12 nights out of the year could be an effective rebuttal. At the very least it would show what a gigantic waste this is.
If the problem is mainly on nights that the PAC has two events, does anyone know how many nights a year that is? 10? 20? Showing that the Orion is being demolished so the Ladies Who Lunch won't be inconvenienced on, say, 12 nights out of the year could be an effective rebuttal. At the very least it would show what a gigantic waste this is.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
I'll venture to guess you're not a 60+ year old woman. Or, in other words, the Webster House's target audience.flyingember wrote:how is there a parking problem?
I have yet to not find an on street spot within a block of that location.
Convince an old woman from the burbs to walk a couple blocks for lunch, and the issue becomes moot. until that time, Helzberg needs a solution to fix her cash flow problem.
That said, the parking garage plan, as slated, is horendous. No need to demolish the facade of that building.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
.
Last edited by pash on Tue Feb 07, 2017 1:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34033
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
Valet...solved.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
$48 million. about $50K per space. clearly shirley's never heard of VALET PARKING.Pastense wrote:This is truly absurd. How many millions of dollars did the city spend on a parking garage next to Webster House? It is extremely underutilized except on performance dates.
- slimwhitman
- Western Auto Lofts
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 am
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
Free Webster House valet parking with double tips for life would still be WAY cheaper than building structured parking. We clearly don't know the entire story here.DaveKCMO wrote:$48 million. about $50K per space. clearly shirley's never heard of VALET PARKING.Pastense wrote:This is truly absurd. How many millions of dollars did the city spend on a parking garage next to Webster House? It is extremely underutilized except on performance dates.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
I get what you're saying and I'm a bit sympathetic to this argument, but good grief, how many 60+ people live in real cities like NYC and walk miles and miles every day?KC-wildcat wrote:I'll venture to guess you're not a 60+ year old woman. Or, in other words, the Webster House's target audience.flyingember wrote:how is there a parking problem?
I have yet to not find an on street spot within a block of that location.
Convince an old woman from the burbs to walk a couple blocks for lunch, and the issue becomes moot. until that time, Helzberg needs a solution to fix her cash flow problem.
That said, the parking garage plan, as slated, is horendous. No need to demolish the facade of that building.
But yea, someone that has lived in the burbs for decades probably is going to balk at walking two blocks. Good heavens.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
Kansas City is not a real city like New York. This is a fundamental, rudimentary principle. Our urban development issues are unique to a sprawling, midwestern city built - out of necessity - on automobiles. Obviously, cities on the East Coast are not the same. KCMO, like all similarly situated midwestern cities is AUTO DEPENDENT. And this isn't going to change in our life times.KCMax wrote:
I get what you're saying and I'm a bit sympathetic to this argument, but good grief, how many 60+ people live in real cities like NYC and walk miles and miles every day?
But yea, someone that has lived in the burbs for decades probably is going to balk at walking two blocks. Good heavens.
Relative to the urban core, the question is whether we are fine turning our nose up at suburbanites and adopting a "we don't need your kind anyhow" type of attitude. Or, in order for downtown to thrive, do we need to find a way to bring these suburbanites back into the fold. I think the answer is clearly the latter. We absolutely need suburbanites to frequent downtown. We need their money. We need their buying power.
The real question is how to cater to suburbanites without sacrificing those things that make the urban core so unique and, frankly, so much better than the suburbs.
I believe the answer is the Country Club Plaza. autos can be catered to in an intelligent way. obscured, tucked-away garages are possible. even if you want to build them up, instead of down, street-level retail or offices go a long way toward mitigating the negative affect of a parking garage.
Shame on Shirly if she just wants to plop a garage onto the site of a former building. But, if she can be talked into a garage with street level retail, that doesn't sacrifice the street-level pedestrian experience, than I've not got a huge problem.
Re: Film Row building threatened with demolition
This probably is the truth/reality of the situation. I do, however, feel there should be an immense amount of planning/thought/restrictions on how and where a garage is built and what they look like. Crossroads should develop some type of code requiring garages to be "hidden". Much like the garages on the plaza and the garage on 18th and Main.KC-wildcat wrote:I believe the answer is the Country Club Plaza. autos can be catered to in an intelligent way. obscured, tucked-away garages are possible. even if you want to build them up, instead of down, street-level retail or offices go a long way toward mitigating the negative affect of a parking garage.
In my estimation, Wyandotte is prime to become a retail/resto corridor and should be protected as such. Many of those building have been rehabbed into event spaces and/or are just waiting for permanent tenants. If they can build a garage that respects the area in this way, then great...her plan is to have retail on that corner in any case. hopefully she comes back with a plan to save the facade in some manner and still provide parking. As long as it fits in I'm okay with it. I do still have faith in Ms Helzberg to develop in a sensitive manner.