Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Transportation topics in KC
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8074
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by flyingember »

flyingember wrote:
Fri Jan 24, 2020 7:09 pm
WD82459

It appears the case was finally heard yesterday.

A little over 1 year from filing the appeal
https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=149735

There's 18 pages of detail, but this should do it. The KCATA won the appeal. I won't put last names, open the document if you care.
The trial court determined that the KCATA owns the property at issue in fee
simple, the *lastname* did not acquire title to the property by adverse possession, and the
*lastname*’ affirmative defenses of laches, waiver, and estoppel were inapplicable to the “issues in
this case.” Finding no error, we affirm.

User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 29844
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by KCPowercat »

Everybody and their mother knows this is about Sherry's property lol

flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8074
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by flyingember »

KCPowercat wrote:
Fri Feb 14, 2020 4:00 pm
Everybody and their mother knows this is about Sherry's property lol
She uses a different professional name from her actual name.

Appeals process from here
https://www.courts.mo.gov/page.jsp?id=6743

It appears that after the option has been filed (Feb 4) there's 15 days to file a request for a rehearing or to transfer to the state supreme court.
If this is done and the appeals court denies it there's 15 days from the denial to put in a request directly to the state supreme court

It's currently day 10 for the first part

User avatar
TrolliKC
Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 10:27 am

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by TrolliKC »

I hope it's costing her... Greed and arrogance

alejandro46
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 320
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:24 pm
Location: King in the North(Land)

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by alejandro46 »

There is NO way the MO SC would hear this case I think. There is no unique question of law or fact here.

Adverse possession is a fun question back on my law school tests. "Owner X was knowingly and deliberately mowing and putting fencing around Y's land for 30 years, Y who didn't know about it etc. etc. It's a fun concept.

However, it's common knowledge that you cannot adversely possess government land. The government can't actively dissuade people from encroaching and 'possessing' all of the land it has title to - people would be trying to take land through this method left and right and it would be a major burden on the government. This lawsuit was BS from the beginning and most other attorneys should have told her she did not have a strong case.

missingkc
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1064
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by missingkc »

And, of course, we know that a rancher in - I think it was Wyoming - did try to claim federal land that his family had grazed cattle on for a couple of generations. It went badly for the family in the long run.

User avatar
im2kull
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3293
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by im2kull »

Her argument, and actions preceding the argument, are so terribly unethical that she should be disbarred. Believe it or not the state bar does require ethical conduct to associate as a licensed lawyer in Missouri. People like this should not be allowed to practice law. Ever.

User avatar
Anthony_Hugo98
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm
Location: Vicenza, IT

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by Anthony_Hugo98 »

missingkc wrote:
Sat Feb 15, 2020 3:33 pm
And, of course, we know that a rancher in - I think it was Wyoming - did try to claim federal land that his family had grazed cattle on for a couple of generations. It went badly for the family in the long run.
I’m pretty sure upon further investigation, it was found that the government had illegally seized the land from that family though, through no due process and with no appeals process, so a little bit more of an apples to oranges deal there.
For all my military brothers and sisters out there, thanks for paving the way, ill do my best! AIRBORNE!

moderne
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4351
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by moderne »

Hearing in the House in Jeff City Feb 25 on republican bill to strip the mail in vote provisions out of the Transportation Development District Statute.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 17828
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC

Post by DaveKCMO »

moderne wrote:
Fri Feb 21, 2020 4:20 pm
Hearing in the House in Jeff City Feb 25 on republican bill to strip the mail in vote provisions out of the Transportation Development District Statute.
Fine with me. We're done here. But if they want to make the process easier or "fairer" they should just eliminate the notary requirement for all mail-in elections.

Post Reply