Jackson County Regional Rail Plan

Transportation topics in KC
Post Reply
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17302
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by GRID »

DaveKCMO wrote:
GRID wrote:So this is back to being strictly a commuter rail line? Has to be with the low ridership projections. For this investment to even begin to make sense, these transit lines need offer fixed service all day long in both directions and not just be one way rush hour trains moving the same people riding the buses today.
where did you get that? no one said anything about peak-only service.
Just guessing by the ridership projections. Very low for a 20 mile line that will be frequent all day service.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20074
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by DaveKCMO »

sanders was on KCUR's up to date yesterday, giving a very detailed update of the current plan: http://kcur.org/post/return-commuter-ra ... son-county
User avatar
Pork Chop
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 4:41 am

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by Pork Chop »

DaveKCMO wrote:sanders was on KCUR's up to date yesterday, giving a very detailed update of the current plan: http://kcur.org/post/return-commuter-ra ... son-county

Sanders does an excellent job and it's worth time listen to this episode. I am very excited to see the plan come to a vote and of course hope it does. It will be a game changer for the region and esp. Jackson County/KC
Last edited by Pork Chop on Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20074
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by DaveKCMO »

indeed, pay attention to his comments about a proposed zoning board that would try to reign in greenfield development in favor of developing along the east and southeast rail lines. this was the first i've heard of it and i'd be very pleased if such a thing actually came into being.
User avatar
Pork Chop
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 4:41 am

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by Pork Chop »

DaveKCMO wrote:indeed, pay attention to his comments about a proposed zoning board that would try to reign in greenfield development in favor of developing along the east and southeast rail lines. this was the first i've heard of it and i'd be very pleased if such a thing actually came into being.
Yes, it's this type of info that makes it worthwhile to listen to. Another example is that the vote is not just for the extension of the Katy Trail, but to also have more trails throughout the county that connect to the extension. Then, it would be possible to get on a trial almost anywhere in Jackson County and go all the way to St. Louis.

It seems to be an ongoing process to have the most well thought out plan possible before going to the voters.

I also to have to say that Sanders is such an asset to Jackson County and I hope he succeeds with this vote and is able to move on to a higher office in Missouri. His type of thinking and style would do the state some good.
earthling
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
Location: milky way, orion arm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by earthling »

Is good to see this momentum but is it too premature to vote before the downtown streetcar is a physical reality? Would think it would have a much better chance passing once everyone can actually see streetcar running in city core, or at least under construction.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20074
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by DaveKCMO »

earthling wrote:Is good to see this momentum but is it too premature to vote before the downtown streetcar is a physical reality? Would think it would have a much better chance passing once everyone can actually see streetcar running in city core, or at least under construction.
countywide question is polling in the 60s and the streetcar is a done deal. now is the time.
earthling
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
Location: milky way, orion arm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by earthling »

^good the hear, get it done.
kcmiz
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:43 pm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by kcmiz »

If I am a resident of Kansas City, Sanders' Commuter Rail Plan in its present form is a non-starter. As it stands, the only stop in KCMO city limits is in the River Market. This plan does nothing to spur TOD in the core. In fact, it promotes further sprawl to the suburbs. You can still have your 3,000 sf McMansion in Eastern Jackson County and ride the train to the big city for work.

Not only that, this plan effectively robs the rest of the city of its financing tool to expand the streetcar. If the county passes 1% sales tax to pay for commuter rail, the likelihood of convincing residents of a new TDD to tax themselves an additional 1% to pay for a streetcar extension is greatly diminished. Sanders has said he would not double tax the current Downtown TDD, but can he afford to let other future TDDs opt out to pay for streetcar expansion (i.e. Old Northeast, Plaza-Midtown)? Probably not.

If Sanders wants this plan to pass, he has to sweeten the deal for residents of KCMO. They make up half the population of Jackson County and they vote. Frankly, trails and buses won't cut it. So how does he do it? The railroads won't grant access to the Trench. Instead, take the commuter rail down Truman Road with several stops in the core to promote TOD. This will be more expensive than using the MO River bottoms track, but it will actually spur development in the core and get suburban commuters downtown rather to the River Market. He could save costs by excluding Grain Valley and Oak Groove from the first phase of the East Line.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20074
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by DaveKCMO »

try selling truman road to that neighborhood of economically disadvantaged people (probably of color) whose homes you'd have to plow over to make that work. you don't save that much by cutting out oak grove and grain valley, certainly not enough to reconstruct truman road for how many miles?

that ship has sailed.
kcmiz
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:43 pm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by kcmiz »

DaveKCMO wrote:try selling truman road to that neighborhood of economically disadvantaged people (probably of color) whose homes you'd have to plow over to make that work. you don't save that much by cutting out oak grove and grain valley, certainly not enough to reconstruct truman road for how many miles?

that ship has sailed.
No homes would have to be plowed over. The street is seven lanes wide the entire stretch. You sell it to them by explaining the economic investment the train would bring to their neighborhoods (increase in job opportunities and increased transportation mobility). Seems like an easy sell to me. That neighborhood has been starving for investment since at least the 1960s.
User avatar
grovester
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4588
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by grovester »

kcmiz wrote:If I am a resident of Kansas City, Sanders' Commuter Rail Plan in its present form is a non-starter. As it stands, the only stop in KCMO city limits is in the River Market. This plan does nothing to spur TOD in the core. In fact, it promotes further sprawl to the suburbs. You can still have your 3,000 sf McMansion in Eastern Jackson County and ride the train to the big city for work.

Not only that, this plan effectively robs the rest of the city of its financing tool to expand the streetcar. If the county passes 1% sales tax to pay for commuter rail, the likelihood of convincing residents of a new TDD to tax themselves an additional 1% to pay for a streetcar extension is greatly diminished. Sanders has said he would not double tax the current Downtown TDD, but can he afford to let other future TDDs opt out to pay for streetcar expansion (i.e. Old Northeast, Plaza-Midtown)? Probably not.

If Sanders wants this plan to pass, he has to sweeten the deal for residents of KCMO. They make up half the population of Jackson County and they vote. Frankly, trails and buses won't cut it. So how does he do it? The railroads won't grant access to the Trench. Instead, take the commuter rail down Truman Road with several stops in the core to promote TOD. This will be more expensive than using the MO River bottoms track, but it will actually spur development in the core and get suburban commuters downtown rather to the River Market. He could save costs by excluding Grain Valley and Oak Groove from the first phase of the East Line.
Interesting points, I'd always assumed the 1% commuter rail tax would either augment or replace any future local funding options, as Dave has said that any other lines would not be able to be funded like downtown was due to lack of property values and/or sales tax base. I was kind of hoping for a streetcar slush fund.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by chaglang »

kcmiz wrote:You sell it to them by explaining the economic investment the train would bring to their neighborhoods (increase in job opportunities and increased transportation mobility). Seems like an easy sell to me. That neighborhood has been starving for investment since at least the 1960s.
I understand the streetcar as an economic catalyst, but is that true of commuter rail? From an outsider's perspective I'd guess that the economic strength of streetcars is people stopping and getting off and shopping/whatever. That's not necessarily true of commuter rail, where the stops are infrequent. My main experience with this mode was in Boston, where the commuter rail shot through neighborhoods like a freight train.
chingon
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3554
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: South Plaza

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by chingon »

DaveKCMO wrote: countywide question is polling in the 60s
Seriously? That is the most exciting thing I've heard in a long time.

As an aside, as someone who will vote for this and will likely never or very rarely use anything except the bike trails...I kind of read this plan as a "long game" strategy in the power/population game versus Johnson County, and I think it pays of big in the next 10-25 years.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20074
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by DaveKCMO »

you nailed it.
User avatar
smh
Supporter
Posts: 4355
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by smh »

chingon wrote: As an aside, as someone who will vote for this and will likely never or very rarely use anything except the bike trails...I kind of read this plan as a "long game" strategy in the power/population game versus Johnson County, and I think it pays of big in the next 10-25 years.
1000x Agreed. Only thing I'd plan to use is rail service to the stadia if offered and bike trails.
User avatar
Pork Chop
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 868
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2004 4:41 am

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by Pork Chop »

smh wrote:
chingon wrote: As an aside, as someone who will vote for this and will likely never or very rarely use anything except the bike trails...I kind of read this plan as a "long game" strategy in the power/population game versus Johnson County, and I think it pays of big in the next 10-25 years.
1000x Agreed...
I totally agree as well. It pits Jackson County's vision of using brownfields for redevelopment against Johnson County’s vision of sprawl and greenfield development.
mean
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 11240
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:00 am
Location: Historic Northeast

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by mean »

chingon wrote:As an aside, as someone who will vote for this and will likely never or very rarely use anything except the bike trails...I kind of read this plan as a "long game" strategy in the power/population game versus Johnson County, and I think it pays of big in the next 10-25 years.
My thoughts exactly. =D>
earthling
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
Location: milky way, orion arm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by earthling »

If 1 or 2 of commuter rail lines come through on MO side, it will be interesting to see if JoCo gains any momentum. Some who were pushing the I-35 line 10 years ago were frustrated that every time JoCo councils change, they had to re-explain and start over. If MO side goes first, JoCo might show more interest but I'm guessing at the State level, they won't want to ship workers downtown. Many JoCo'ers in our downtown office strongly want it, topic comes up often.
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7473
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: KC Commuter Rail

Post by shinatoo »

Low interest on bonds, 10th of the cost of building it from fresh track. Iron hot, strike it.
Post Reply