TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! THE BIG 12 IS DEAD! MAYBE!
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34138
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
It was a joke. Learning process? Wtf?
- beautyfromashes
- One Park Place
- Posts: 7299
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Looks like Missouri got the boot.“Beginning with the 2012-13 season it is expected that the Big 12 Conference will be comprised of 10 universities—Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, TCU, Texas, Texas Tech and West Virginia,” the statement said.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Soooo,
with West Virginia on board, and the prospect of Louisville being added to bring this conference back to 12 schools, and equal revenue sharing across the board, and the Tier 1 TV package up for renewal.......
Does MU seriously still think a move to the SEC is in their best interest??
I think that a North Division with MU, KU, KSU, ISU, WVU, LVille is pretty solid. South Division with UT, OU, OSU, TCU, Tech, Baylor.
with West Virginia on board, and the prospect of Louisville being added to bring this conference back to 12 schools, and equal revenue sharing across the board, and the Tier 1 TV package up for renewal.......
Does MU seriously still think a move to the SEC is in their best interest??
I think that a North Division with MU, KU, KSU, ISU, WVU, LVille is pretty solid. South Division with UT, OU, OSU, TCU, Tech, Baylor.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
And if by some miracle we get Notre Dame?KC-wildcat wrote:Soooo,
with West Virginia on board, and the prospect of Louisville being added to bring this conference back to 12 schools, and equal revenue sharing across the board, and the Tier 1 TV package up for renewal.......
Does MU seriously still think a move to the SEC is in their best interest??
I think that a North Division with MU, KU, KSU, ISU, WVU, LVille is pretty solid. South Division with UT, OU, OSU, TCU, Tech, Baylor.
- AllThingsKC
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9371
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
No. MU is having to settle for the SEC, just like West Virginia has to settle for the Big 12.KC-wildcat wrote:Does MU seriously still think a move to the SEC is in their best interest??
This looks really good. But, read the post above yours. Looks like the Big 12 is staying at 10 for now, which means no divisions and no championship games. It looks like Louisville is left out, for now.KC-wildcat wrote: I think that a North Division with MU, KU, KSU, ISU, WVU, LVille is pretty solid. South Division with UT, OU, OSU, TCU, Tech, Baylor.
- AllThingsKC
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9371
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Kevin Keitzman was talking about the Big 12 adding ND in all sports except football, and adding BYU in football only.KCMax wrote:And if by some miracle we get Notre Dame?
So, the Big 12 would look a little like this:
(Now, that is some crazy graphic from a random MU fan.)
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
BigXII > Big East. WVU will make much more $$$ and gains a higher profile. Don't know if "settling" is quite accurate.AllThingsKC wrote:No. MU is having to settle for the SEC, just like West Virginia has to settle for the Big 12.KC-wildcat wrote:Does MU seriously still think a move to the SEC is in their best interest??
This looks really good. But, read the post above yours. Looks like the Big 12 is staying at 10 for now, which means no divisions and no championship games. It looks like Louisville is left out, for now.KC-wildcat wrote: I think that a North Division with MU, KU, KSU, ISU, WVU, LVille is pretty solid. South Division with UT, OU, OSU, TCU, Tech, Baylor.
BigXII doesn't want to be at an odd number because of scheduling logistics. We're at 10 w/o MU. If MU stays, we'll need one more team...
Insofacto, MU may see the benefit of staying. But probably not.
Also reports from campus corner that UT agreed to 10 year grant of right.
- AllThingsKC
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9371
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Can't the same be said for MU with SEC > Big 12?KC-wildcat wrote: BigXII > Big East. WVU will make much more $$$ and gains a higher profile. Don't know if "settling" is quite accurate.
At this point, I'm pretty sure MU is gone. KK recommends staying at 10 for a few years, anyway. I'm not sure I agree with that, but either way, I don't think the Big 12 is going to have to worry about 11 teams. It would be either 10 or 12, I think.KC-wildcat wrote: BigXII doesn't want to be at an odd number because of scheduling logistics. We're at 10 w/o MU. If MU stays, we'll need one more team...
Insofacto, MU may see the benefit of staying. But probably not.
Also reports from campus corner that UT agreed to 10 year grant of right.
And yes, it is very possible that by this time next year, Mizzou would be fully aware that they made a mistake. Only time will tell.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
I didn't say MU was settling. I asked whether the SEC was in their best interest.AllThingsKC wrote:
Can't the same be said for MU with SEC > Big 12?
But yeah, not worth debating anymore. MU is gone.
- AllThingsKC
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9371
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Well, then...to answer your question: I'm not fully convinced that the SEC is in MU's best interest. So, yeah, to me it looks like they are having to "settle" for the SEC. (Of course, if MU had stayed, I would have probably looked at that as MU having to "settle" for the Big 12. So, it goes both ways, I guess.)KC-wildcat wrote:I didn't say MU was settling. I asked whether the SEC was in their best interest.
-
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
- Location: ~Westwood~
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Welp, so much for MoMan's Texas won't commit to long term grant of rights argument!
10 years.
Why is MU leaving again? I think I've forgotten.
10 years.
Why is MU leaving again? I think I've forgotten.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34138
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
They want to get pushed around by other teams....not just texas. Don't you get it?
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
I don't thinking "settling" has anything to do with it. It's possible that MU' is just making a foolish decision, right?AllThingsKC wrote:Well, then...to answer your question: I'm not fully convinced that the SEC is in MU's best interest. So, yeah, to me it looks like they are having to "settle" for the SEC. (Of course, if MU had stayed, I would have probably looked at that as MU having to "settle" for the Big 12. So, it goes both ways, I guess.)KC-wildcat wrote:I didn't say MU was settling. I asked whether the SEC was in their best interest.
In this case, I think MU wholheartedly supports the SEC move. It's going to open up a pandora's box of greatness for MU.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Just speculation it seems, but this article posits that if the Big 12 lets ND in for non-football, why wouldn't it do that for Texas, and allow UT football to go independent?
COULD NOTRE DAME BE TEEING UP TEXAS?
COULD NOTRE DAME BE TEEING UP TEXAS?
- beautyfromashes
- One Park Place
- Posts: 7299
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
If Missouri is going to make so much money moving to the SEC, then why are they holding this up because of the Big 12 exit fee? Pay it and be gone!
-
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
- Location: ~Westwood~
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
They're milking every last drop out of their 15 minutes of fame. Can't blame em'.beautyfromashes wrote:If Missouri is going to make so much money moving to the SEC, then why are they holding this up because of the Big 12 exit fee? Pay it and be gone!
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3454
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:11 pm
- Location: Phoenix
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Yeah, crazy, as in the same way that it is crazy how Nostradamus has been able to predict every major world event by making vague predictions that people can then project their own fears and hopes onto in order to make themselves feel better. So some random Missouri fan who feels a subconscious fear that Missouri is doing the wrong thing adds a couple teams that may (WV) or probably won't (BYU) be added to the conference, ignoring any other schools that also may be in the mix, and throws a shape which bears an extremely vague resemblance and could be replaced by many other semi-relevant shapes over a map of the mythical conference and tries to use that as some kind of mystical justification to leave the conference that is now, by all measures except for for maximum spite and greed, the best for them.AllThingsKC wrote:Kevin Keitzman was talking about the Big 12 adding ND in all sports except football, and adding BYU in football only.KCMax wrote:And if by some miracle we get Notre Dame?
So, the Big 12 would look a little like this:
(Now, that is some crazy graphic from a random MU fan.)
-
- One Park Place
- Posts: 6687
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:19 pm
- WSPanic
- Supporter
- Posts: 3817
- Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 4:57 pm
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Even with the pie in the sky money estimates for revenue increases from the SEC - that have yet be proven - Mizzou will be millions and millions of dollars behind a dozen conference schools for overall athletic budgets. So, they are going to pinching pennies for quite a while.beautyfromashes wrote:If Missouri is going to make so much money moving to the SEC, then why are they holding this up because of the Big 12 exit fee? Pay it and be gone!
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! TH
Mizzou Chancellor Brady Deaton has cancelled his trip to India this week.