KCRag Forum

kcdcchef wrote: i did not call you any names, do not call me any. and i wish nothing but harm for them, they are nameless, faceless cowards. at least kietz and pestro have the balls to campaign with their names. these dildos go on the air with fake names. be a man about it.

aknowledgeableperson wrote: ^^^
Why not set the example and do it yourself?

lock&load wrote: Because I'm not the one calling anyone out as a "nameless, faceless coward."

kcdcchef wrote: my info will not be posted on here, however, it is available through many kansas city area organizations i donate to, kansas city heart of america shakespeare festival, lyric opera of kansas city, liberty memorial association of kansas city, the kansas city rennaisance festival, the kansas city art institute, and union station assistance corp, these groups have all recieved donations, and appropriate information from me.

disclosing my name, and address, on a message board, is ridiculous. i do not have to. when i call into 810, or write the star, i do so as myself. when i support campaigns, i do so as myself.

these cowards, saveourowners, do not.

lock&load wrote: Right.  You want anonymity on the internet, as do they.    All this other crap you mention is irrelevant.  You are supporting a campaign here now and refuse to identify youself, so I guess your statement above is inaccurate.

beautyfromashes wrote: funny that kc didn't make his first or second favorite city.  What a joke! Go find a DC or Boston forum.

kcdcchef wrote:
these cowards, saveourowners, do not.

chrizow wrote: jesus h. christ.  have you ever heard of satire?  the saveourowners people are not using pseudonyms because they are cowards, they are using absurd names meant to invoke the idea of pretentious aristocrats coming to the aid of other aristocrats.  the names themselves are part of the satire, as is picking up the Pitch interviewer in a limo and giving him champagne (http://www.pitch.com/Issues/2006-03-16/news/strip.html)

you're just bitter b/c you happen to disagree with their point of view.  you're also bitter b/c their point of view is reaching thousands of people via a $9 website.   :lol:

let the chips fall where they may.  they're not going to be fined, so get over that.  argue against them, campaign against them, set up a competing website, whatever.  it's just tactless and immature to wish these folks ill will because they are using satire and humor to make a political argument you do not agree with.

beautyfromashes wrote: pathetic.

KCMax wrote: Good one chef!

kcdcchef wrote: yes, you are.