KCRag Forum

This city really has no vision does it. The moronic masses vote to suck blood out of a turnip (Question 1), and at the same time to give up on the prospects of a super bowl (Question 2).

Both of these proposals should have failed, but if one had to win, then both should have won. But the doddering boobs who comprise the electorate around here decided to take the losing way out. This town has such an inferiority complex it's ridiculous.

mean wrote: Actually, the 25 years thing is probably bogus. The stadiums will need another major renovation before then, to stay "state of the art," lest the county risk defaulting again. I give it 10-15 years.

Made it 33 years the first time.

Yes, amazingly the idiots in this county selected the worst option of the four available to them.  Not suprising at all.

Just sit back and watch as KC continues it's quest for irrelevance.  We're well on our way.

Welcome to Kansas City--where it's still 1963!

mean wrote: Actually, the 25 years thing is probably bogus. The stadiums will need another major renovation before then, to stay "state of the art," lest the county risk defaulting again. I give it 10-15 years.

It's no longer the counties responsibility..  well at least until another loophole is found.

MidWestSider wrote: It's no longer the counties responsibility..  well at least until another loophole is found.

Right.  They'll be sure that the stadiums are in terrible shape by time 2031 rolls around, you can count on that.

shinatoo wrote: Made it 33 years the first time.

and, they will make it 35 before any real work begins. those stadiums were and are amazing for 33, 34 years now, and this will make them last until the end of the lease, easily. those stadiums will both make it to be 55 year old stadiums, if not 60. and do so as state of the art stadiums.

Kard wrote: Welcome to Kansas City--where it's still 1963!

well, then, by your great thinking, welcome to boston where it is 1912, or chicago, where it is 1908, or los angeles, where it is 1960.