OFFICIAL - Hampton Inn (formerly Gumbel Building)

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
Post Reply
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: OFFICIAL - Hampton Inn (formerly Gumbel Building)

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

chrizow wrote: well, if they are currently being pre-sold and bought up, i won't be able to get in on one.  i was thinking they would go up for sale in like 9 months.  silly me! 
That seems to be an increasing issue I have noticed with a lot of the conversions.  Seems like in order to get the unit you want you have to pre-buy shortly after they go on sale but then you need to be prepared to wait a pretty significant time for the construction and likely delays before you ever get to closing.  Its as if you need to make the purchase a year or more before you intend to move; and that isn't exactly handy. 
User avatar
chrizow
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 17161
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:43 am

Re: OFFICIAL - Hampton Inn (formerly Gumbel Building)

Post by chrizow »

^

not to mention you are essentially buying based on self-serving renderings and marketing from the developers.  i'd hate to pre-buy a unit and experience the sort of horrors that people who bought in the wallstreet tower are experiencing. 

buying a year ahead of time isn't a problem for me by itself, but the whole "sight-unseen" thing is a big problem. 
Long
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1450
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:47 pm

Re: OFFICIAL - Hampton Inn (formerly Gumbel Building)

Post by Long »

chrizow wrote: buying a year ahead of time isn't a problem for me by itself, but the whole "sight-unseen" thing is a big problem. 
Only way I would consider it is if

(1) I could see the actual space with wall locations marked off on the floor

AND

(2) I could examine a model unit with a fine-tooth comb, then put into the contract that said model will serve as the standard of quality for my finished unit
Long
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1450
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 11:47 pm

Re: OFFICIAL - Hampton Inn (formerly Gumbel Building)

Post by Long »

AND

(3) contract would say the Punchlist is FINISHED before developer gets final payment.  I would consider keeping the final payment in an escrow account to show good faith.

Developers and contractors build on the cheap because they know they can get away with it.  I would demand the contract have these provisions or I'd be prepared to walk-- there are always going to be more condos as good or better.
User avatar
chrizow
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 17161
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:43 am

Re: OFFICIAL - Hampton Inn (formerly Gumbel Building)

Post by chrizow »

excellent advice.  gracias, long. 
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5564
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by moderne »

  Like the port a potty on the roof.  Hope this means they will be working on constructing the rooftop units.  Just dont spill that outhouse when the crane lifts it off.
User avatar
chrizow
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 17161
Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:43 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by chrizow »

maybe it's "art."
User avatar
snarf
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 134
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2003 3:08 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by snarf »

Long, part of "getting in early" is the unseen piece of it.  If you want the project to be nearly completed or to your exact specifications then try looking at properties that are already on the market and completed.  The reason, many times, that it seems that those that get in on property early get a better return on their investment is because they are taking risk.

Ask anyone that bought property downtown three years ago.
User avatar
KCDowntown
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1039
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:17 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by KCDowntown »

I found a different rendering of this project than the 2 on the website:

Image

KCDowntown
User avatar
VELO DOOM
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 4:10 pm
Location: River Market

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by VELO DOOM »

If I remember correctly this building housed a few offices right?  So where are they going...hmmm probably somewhere outside the "Central Business District."  But hey why should a few little offices stand in the way of this booming condo metropolis?
great men live dangerously, small men don't take chances.
kccrackednut
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 8:47 pm

Gumbel Condos: What Happened?

Post by kccrackednut »

Anybody know what the status is on this project? Did it die?
User avatar
voltopt
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 2:56 pm
Location: Manheim Park
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by voltopt »

Mostly dead - the owner was a little too reticent and the market passed him by.  There is a model unit, but the upper floors are still being used as office space.
"I never quarrel, sir; but I do fight, sir; and when I fight, sir, a funeral follows, sir."   -senator thomas hart benton
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20072
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by DaveKCMO »

notice on the front door says water has been disconnected due to lack of payment. codes officer taking pics of the interior. such a shame.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18338
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by FangKC »

I have a feeling that the Gumbel Building will have to be sold to get out of it's present situation. I think the owner is under-capitalized, and that project needs someone with the money to spend to finish it. The Building is a great property though, and I think people will want to buy condos there once the market and financing starts to improve.
User avatar
smh
Supporter
Posts: 4346
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by smh »

So, this is an extremely old thread but...

I noticed today a truck outside the Gumbel loading up what appeared to be a collection of metal air ducts for a ventilation system. At the same time I noticed that the building for sale signs are gone from the windows. It would be too much to hope something positive is happening here, right?
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20072
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by DaveKCMO »

smh wrote:So, this is an extremely old thread but...

I noticed today a truck outside the Gumbel loading up what appeared to be a collection of metal air ducts for a ventilation system. At the same time I noticed that the building for sale signs are gone from the windows. It would be too much to hope something positive is happening here, right?
any open permits? what's the address? http://kivaweb.kcmo.org/kivanet/2/permit/index.cfm?
User avatar
smh
Supporter
Posts: 4346
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by smh »

DaveKCMO wrote:
smh wrote:So, this is an extremely old thread but...

I noticed today a truck outside the Gumbel loading up what appeared to be a collection of metal air ducts for a ventilation system. At the same time I noticed that the building for sale signs are gone from the windows. It would be too much to hope something positive is happening here, right?
any open permits? what's the address? http://kivaweb.kcmo.org/kivanet/2/permit/index.cfm?
To the parcel viewer! This is 801 Walnut. I do notice that ownership has changed--though not immediately obvious when. Scratch that, ownership has been the same since 2005.
Last edited by smh on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
smh
Supporter
Posts: 4346
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by smh »

Eh, lame. "Interior demolition work, no build back".

Sigh.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20072
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by DaveKCMO »

at least they're up to date on their taxes. better get some tenant revenue soon because their streetcar assessment will run them an extra $1,190.40 this year!
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Gumbel Condos

Post by loftguy »

smh wrote:
DaveKCMO wrote:
smh wrote:So, this is an extremely old thread but...

I noticed today a truck outside the Gumbel loading up what appeared to be a collection of metal air ducts for a ventilation system. At the same time I noticed that the building for sale signs are gone from the windows. It would be too much to hope something positive is happening here, right?
any open permits? what's the address? http://kivaweb.kcmo.org/kivanet/2/permit/index.cfm?
To the parcel viewer! This is 801 Walnut. I do notice that ownership has changed--though not immediately obvious when. Scratch that, ownership has been the same since 2005.
Darn! I was hoping for someone to step in who is capable of making good things happen here. Such a beautiful structure.
Post Reply