Would you rather have an empty space or Montana Mike's?KCPowercat wrote: dude is recommending Montana Mike's and then stated better that than empty space? Like those are the only 2 options.
By the way, have you eaten there?
Would you rather have an empty space or Montana Mike's?KCPowercat wrote: dude is recommending Montana Mike's and then stated better that than empty space? Like those are the only 2 options.
Those aren't the only 2 options. I'll take empty space because something would fill it in quickly.aknowledgeableperson wrote: Would you rather have an empty space or Montana Mike's?
By the way, have you eaten there?
we all do, as do i. but do read some of these p&l threads, and every single concept that gets mentioned someone pisses on it. what do you think cordish is going to do here? look at the inner harbour, and louisville, look at them. cordish redo's. there will be a ton of everyday shit there. and why not? there should be, tourists, and conventioneers, are all types, that like all kinds of places.KCMax wrote: Well that's kind of a strawman, isn't it chef? No one is suggesting they put nothing in. I think we should be able to voice our concern that they put in restaurants that work. We all want this thing to succeed.
I agree that some of the criticisim of the potential tenants is rediculous. I am inclined to think that a hooters is a grand slam idea for downtown (convention goers, after work happy hour, tourists, perfect). I think the Bristol is a great fit. And I think the criticisim leveled at the chain noodle shop is rediculous, especially since it is probably going in the H&R food court. That said, I do want to see Cordish show a little bit of discretion. We don't want this place to be filled out with nothing but tourist junk shops, t-shirt shops, and nothing but tourist trap restaurants like Saint Louis' Union Station. That place has nothing to offer naitive saint louisians and has become increasingly irrelevant for tourists.kcdcchef wrote: we all do, as do i. but do read some of these p&l threads, and every single concept that gets mentioned someone pisses on it. what do you think cordish is going to do here? look at the inner harbour, and louisville, look at them. cordish redo's. there will be a ton of everyday shit there. and why not? there should be, tourists, and conventioneers, are all types, that like all kinds of places.
we can voice our concerns all day long, but this man has been hired to work his magic there, not us. and thank god, let him do it. i mean, go to michigan ave in chicago, times square in new york, dupont circle in dc, downtown dc, all these big cities, and go to their most happening areas. times square in ny? there is an olive garden, ruby tuesdays, dennys, and red lobster. so, we are more upscale then new york city now? c''mon, we need all types of places, not just things we want. the place will get powered by out of towners, tourists, and conventioneers. not us.
Where have I said I hope that P&L bombs? Or that I am lusting that the arena runs out of money? And it is a stretch to say to Cordish will sit on tons of square feet of empty space? And where did I say that I wanted Ponderosa?LenexatoKCMO wrote:Â
I think it is all moot; I am sure that Cordish hasn't had any problem lining up upscale tenants, even if a handful of them may be more for the out of towners. I don't think we will ever be anywhere near the dire situation that AKP is lusting after where P&L bombs, the arena runs out of money halfway throughconstruction and Cordish is sitting on tons of square feet of empty space and begging Ponderosa to sign on.Â
so, ponderosa..........................................................LenexatoKCMO wrote: I agree that some of the criticisim of the potential tenants is rediculous. I am inclined to think that a hooters is a grand slam idea for downtown (convention goers, after work happy hour, tourists, perfect). I think the Bristol is a great fit. And I think the criticisim leveled at the chain noodle shop is rediculous, especially since it is probably going in the H&R food court. That said, I do want to see Cordish show a little bit of discretion. We don't want this place to be filled out with nothing but tourist junk shops, t-shirt shops, and nothing but tourist trap restaurants like Saint Louis' Union Station. That place has nothing to offer naitive saint louisians and has become increasingly irrelevant for tourists.Â
I think it is all moot; I am sure that Cordish hasn't had any problem lining up upscale tenants, even if a handful of them may be more for the out of towners. I don't think we will ever be anywhere near the dire situation that AKP is lusting after where P&L bombs, the arena runs out of money halfway throughconstruction and Cordish is sitting on tons of square feet of empty space and begging Ponderosa to sign on.Â
kcdcchef wrote: never eaten at a montana mikes. heard it is similar to ryans or ponderosa. and if it is.......................fne.
my vote.....full space versus empty space. period.
kcdcchef wrote: oh no, fuck that. i hate the irs development, am not crazy about the fed reserve project, and detest certain components of the p&l district ( ie, putting in some dumbass expiremental theater in the empire versus a real cinaplex )
we fundamentally disagree on this and tsc. but supporting anything versus something..................no.
49r49r wrote:
exactly. this is why i am ho-hum about the district. i am grateful for the bricks and mortar they are putting in, but the tenant mix will likely make me cringe. that's fine - i doubt i am the demo Cordish is shooting for...but still.FreeNachos wrote: Regardless, of the Cordish company boring and unoriginal vision (The Power Plant in Baltimore is Independence Center with more brick),