Re: Big 12 Football
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 5:23 pm
(KU + VTech) > (AR + MU)jlbomega wrote: My point all along has been the Cotton was a better game this year and the final rankings proved it.
(KU + VTech) > (AR + MU)jlbomega wrote: My point all along has been the Cotton was a better game this year and the final rankings proved it.
Metro's unbiased computerized ranking system.NDTeve wrote: Which rankings would those be?
eomaha.com wrote:
In spite of playing second and third fiddle to fledgling Missouri and Kansas football programs... there apparently are still some people in Lincoln... who are enthusiastically following Nebraska football. Including 81,000 who showed up to watch the spring scrimmage.
The way football at Nebraska is going the Spring Game is probably the best game of the yeareomaha.com wrote:
In spite of playing second and third fiddle to fledgling Missouri and Kansas football programs... there apparently are still some people in Lincoln... who are enthusiastically following Nebraska football. Including 81,000 who showed up to watch the spring scrimmage.
I don't see us "blasting" them, but a loss would be a huge disappointment. I know playing in Lincoln is hard, but they have no secondary.Maitre D wrote: I wouldn't laugh JLB. KU & MU both travel to Lincoln this year. Forget any thoughts of blasting them the way we did last year.
Not only that, they pretty much lost a recruiting class this year. They managed to hold on to a few good players but many bolted. Having said that, I've always rather like Nebraska, mostly because of my disdain for OU, and I think they will be back.jlbomega wrote: I don't see us "blasting" them, but a loss would be a huge disappointment. I know playing in Lincoln is hard, but they have no secondary.
Highlander wrote: Not only that, they pretty much lost a recruiting class this year. They managed to hold on to a few good players but many bolted.
So, who's making a comparison to Mizzou's class? Nebraska's class was much better at one time until they got hit hard by recruits jumping ship.Maitre D wrote:
They finished 30th, while MU finished 25th. Hardly miles apart:
http://rivals100.rivals.com/teamrank.as ... e=0&Sort=0
What's the penalty for criminal bevaior by your student-athletes? Obviously, the NCAA doesn't seem to care about any of this b/c Mizzou isn't getting punished whatsoever, despite their "Fullmer Cup" domination.KCPowercat wrote: the penalty for fraud isn't high enough IMO.
Ohio State #1? This is the bull shit that allows Ohio State to roll through the bogus Big 10 and back into the National Championship. This year is setting up nicely for OSU to return for a third time. They have the opportunity to beat a down USC team in September to solidify their spot. Whomever wins the Big 12 or SEC will most likely play them and destroy them.... AGAIN!NDTeve wrote: Must say...I think that #7 ranking is a bit high.
Rucker will be tough to replace. Mizzou was loaded with talented wide outs and running backs so losing Franklin and Temple should not be too painful. The line may actually improve. Hopefully, Alexander will come back from a bad knee injury that ended his 2008 season.jlbomega wrote: Ohio State #1? This is the bull shit that allows Ohio State to roll through the bogus Big 10 and back into the National Championship. This year is setting up nicely for OSU to return for a third time. They have the opportunity to beat a down USC team in September to solidify their spot. Whomever wins the Big 12 or SEC will most likely play them and destroy them.... AGAIN!
Dennis Dodd loved Kansas last year btw, hence the high ranking.
I'm not so sure Mizzou's offense will be any better than last year, but the defense should be better.