OFFICIAL: Briarcliff Village

Talk about the ever expanding north side of KC.
Post Reply
midtown guy
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:56 pm

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by midtown guy »

LenexatoKCMO wrote: I hadn't even thought about that - what impact will hotel rooms at Briarcliff have on the prospects for a new DT convention hotel.  I would think the addition of rooms that close cant be a good thing.  And what convention goer is actually going to want to stay on the wrong side of the river.  Sounds like we are shooting ourselves in the fucking foot to me. 
I concur -- John may have just made my decision on who to vote for for Mayor a bit easier...
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20074
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by DaveKCMO »

funkhouser!
User avatar
Thrillcekr
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2161
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by Thrillcekr »

I thought this whole TIF thing was meant to encourage development in areas that might not otherwise be developed.  With Briarcliff, it sounds like they've got more demand than supply so I don't really see where this sort of incentive is necessary.  I also don't understand why they are so happy about a new hotel being built close to downtown.  They make it sound as if they've done a really great thing.  They should be using incentives to encourage people to build hotels IN downtown.
Marreekarr
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by Marreekarr »

Thrillcekr wrote: I thought this whole TIF thing was meant to encourage development in areas that might not otherwise be developed.
That's right!  Right on Kard for keeping us abreast on this one.  I'm glad someone at the bizjournal can smell the stench emanating from City Hall.  And we wonder why people in the suburbs don't trust KCMO when it comes to issues relating to bi-state taxes.
User avatar
bahua
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 10940
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 7:39 pm
Location: Out of Town
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by bahua »

Thrillcekr wrote: I thought this whole TIF thing was meant to encourage development in areas that might not otherwise be developed.  With Briarcliff, it sounds like they've got more demand than supply so I don't really see where this sort of incentive is necessary.
Yeah, it isn't necessary. The thing is, a developer can save a lot of money by getting their buddies at city hall to kick them a deal. The whole situation reeks of corruption. It just stinks.
ShowME
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1094
Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2002 11:09 pm

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by ShowME »

And we wonder why people in the suburbs don't trust KCMO when it comes to issues relating to bi-state taxes.

Huh??  Wtf did that come from?  Maybe it's you that has issues.
Calling a spade a spade.
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

ShowME wrote:
Huh??  Wtf did that come from?  Maybe it's you that has issues.


Woah deep breaths.  I think his point was that this is an example of KCMO displaying less than above-board responsibility with the public coffers (something some of the most dedicated KCMO posters on the site were generally agreeing with).  While it is probably dubious that lots of non-kcmo suburbanites will necessarily take notice of this specific boondogle, it is perhaps fair to say that if indeed there is something sleazy behind this, it is exactly the sort of thing that has contributed to the city's poor reputation amongst its neighbors for fiscal responsibility and sound governance. 
Marreekarr
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 12:08 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by Marreekarr »

LenexatoKCMO wrote: ...if indeed there is something sleazy behind this, it is exactly the sort of thing that has contributed to the city's poor reputation amongst its neighbors for fiscal responsibility and sound governance. 
Well said.  Although, I must agree with ShowMe.  I do have many issues, some which I chose to share with you all and some which I chose to uh...er...keep to myself!
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17302
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by GRID »

Thrillcekr wrote: I thought this whole TIF thing was meant to encourage development in areas that might not otherwise be developed.  With Briarcliff, it sounds like they've got more demand than supply so I don't really see where this sort of incentive is necessary.  I also don't understand why they are so happy about a new hotel being built close to downtown.  They make it sound as if they've done a really great thing.  They should be using incentives to encourage people to build hotels IN downtown.
Briarcliff would not have developed (the way it has developed) without tiffs.  Ten years ago, people would have laughed if you said Briarcliff West would look like it does today.  A very rough terrain location between Riverside and the water treatment plant along a run down highway with no interchange, no Briarcliff Blvd, no multi million dollar executive housing, nothing.  You "might" have eventually seen few random homes go up, but nothing like the classy development that has happened there.

I would bet that every one of the tenants in those office buildings would be in JoCo right now if that development didn't exist.  I would bet over half the cars in the office building parking lots are JoCo cars, or at least that's what I have seen while there.  This is a very nice development and it was a brownfield compared to any of your office parks in South Creek or College Blvd or Tiffany Springs.  This is what tiffs are for, to create a first class development in an urban or "infill" location.

My god, the tenants in those buildings I'm sure eat at Lideas, Jack Stack, etc.  They will heavily contribute to the power and light district. They are building the FIRST REAL suburban high density condo buildings in the metro area. The developer of Briarcliff LOVES downtown.  He is offering a unique mixed use atmosphere five minutes from downtown, ten minutes from KCI in KCMO to people that probably would otherwise have no idea what is going on Downtown because they would be in a fringe office park otherwise. That is the market Briarcliff is after.  They really don't compete with Downtown for office tenants and I think you could argue the same with the residential and hotel component.

This development has also drastically improved the image of KC as people cab into the city from KCI via Broadway.  A hotel there would be a great addition to our hotel choices.  The views of downtown will be so dramatic visitors will be drawn into the city and they will never forget our amazing skyline from the 10th floor of a hotel on one of the hills of Briarcliff.

I don't understand this, I really don't.  KCMO has to compete with its burbs, even the burbs within its own city limits.  This is a great project and I for one hope the development succeeds with or without incentives.

Briarcliff will compete with Tiffany Springs Hotels, OP office parks and plaza condos sure, but it will help Downtown IMO and it sure gives the city some much needed "red carpet" as you enter the city.
User avatar
justin8216
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1822
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 7:52 pm
Location: Kansas City

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by justin8216 »

KCMo Approves Ultra Mega TIF for the blighted Briarcliff area!

There is no room left for any MO forum members to criticize the incentives used for Village West. To do so would be pure hypocrisy.

At least our incentives begot Wyandotte County's citizens and government tangible benefits.

What are the benefits to the citizens of KCMO for subsidizing Briarcliff? More hotel rooms close to downtown? Please! Is that the best they could come up with? I'm hard pressed to think of any real benefits to the citizens of KCMO for this blatant corporate welfare.
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by dangerboy »

justin8216 wrote: KCMo Approves Ultra Mega TIF for the blighted Briarcliff area!

There is no room left for any MO forum members to criticize the incentives used for Village West. To do so would be pure hypocrisy.

At least our incentives begot Wyandotte County's citizens and government tangible benefits.

What are the benefits to the citizens of KCMO for subsidizing Briarcliff? More hotel rooms close to downtown? Please! Is that the best they could come up with? I'm hard pressed to think of any real benefits to the citizens of KCMO for this blatant corporate welfare.
Justin, there you go again, breaking your promise to never post in a KCMO thread.
User avatar
Thrillcekr
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2161
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by Thrillcekr »

GRID wrote: Briarcliff would not have developed (the way it has developed) without tiffs.  Ten years ago, people would have laughed if you said Briarcliff West would look like it does today.  A very rough terrain location between Riverside and the water treatment plant along a run down highway with no interchange, no Briarcliff Blvd, no multi million dollar executive housing, nothing.  You "might" have eventually seen few random homes go up, but nothing like the classy development that has happened there.

I would bet that every one of the tenants in those office buildings would be in JoCo right now if that development didn't exist.  I would bet over half the cars in the office building parking lots are JoCo cars, or at least that's what I have seen while there.  This is a very nice development and it was a brownfield compared to any of your office parks in South Creek or College Blvd or Tiffany Springs.  This is what tiffs are for, to create a first class development in an urban or "infill" location.

My god, the tenants in those buildings I'm sure eat at Lideas, Jack Stack, etc.  They will heavily contribute to the power and light district. They are building the FIRST REAL suburban high density condo buildings in the metro area. The developer of Briarcliff LOVES downtown.  He is offering a unique mixed use atmosphere five minutes from downtown, ten minutes from KCI in KCMO to people that probably would otherwise have no idea what is going on Downtown because they would be in a fringe office park otherwise. That is the market Briarcliff is after.  They really don't compete with Downtown for office tenants and I think you could argue the same with the residential and hotel component.

This development has also drastically improved the image of KC as people cab into the city from KCI via Broadway.  A hotel there would be a great addition to our hotel choices.  The views of downtown will be so dramatic visitors will be drawn into the city and they will never forget our amazing skyline from the 10th floor of a hotel on one of the hills of Briarcliff.

I don't understand this, I really don't.  KCMO has to compete with its burbs, even the burbs within its own city limits.  This is a great project and I for one hope the development succeeds with or without incentives.

Briarcliff will compete with Tiffany Springs Hotels, OP office parks and plaza condos sure, but it will help Downtown IMO and it sure gives the city some much needed "red carpet" as you enter the city.
You're talking ten years ago.  This incentive is being handed out NOW.  You can't convince me that a red hot area like Briarcliff needs TIF to make these things happen now.  They WANT IT but they sure as hell don't NEED IT.  The occupancy rate testifies to that.
User avatar
kard
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:37 pm
Location: Kingdom of Waldo

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by kard »

Right.  TIF's help get things off the ground, but after that the place should sustain itself.  Are they still handing TIF's in JoCo to places like Park Place and Prairie Fire?
Haikus are easy
But sometimes they don't make sense
Refrigerator
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by KCMax »

justin8216 wrote:
There is no room left for any MO forum members to criticize the incentives used for Village West. To do so would be pure hypocrisy.
How do you figure? Nearly all MO forum members here are criticizing TIF for Briarcliff. Its ridiculous. Just as ridiculous as TIF at Village West for a friggin Wal Mart.
SAVE THE PLAZA - FROM ZOMBIES! Find out how at:

http://twitter.com/TheKCRag
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17302
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by GRID »

Kard wrote: Right.  TIF's help get things off the ground, but after that the place should sustain itself.  Are they still handing TIF's in JoCo to places like Park Place and Prairie Fire?
So they are asking for new tiffs?  I've been out of the news loop latley.
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

GRID wrote: So they are asking for new tiffs?  I've been out of the news loop latley.
Yeah they are looking to get a load more TIF for more retail and a hotel.  That is why people are up in arms.  Brirarcliff is way past the needing public support stage.  Plus the additional hotel rooms on the wrong side of the river seem pretty questionable. 
User avatar
kard
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 5627
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:37 pm
Location: Kingdom of Waldo

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by kard »

GRID wrote: So they are asking for new tiffs?  I've been out of the news loop latley.
It sounds like a Super TIF is about to be handed to Briarcliff.

I gathered it was originally thought up awhile ago by Cash Cow Cooper but it only being voted on now.

Check that Biz Journal article.  It's rather interesting.
Haikus are easy
But sometimes they don't make sense
Refrigerator
User avatar
bahua
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 10940
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 7:39 pm
Location: Out of Town
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by bahua »

Thrillcekr wrote: You're talking ten years ago.  This incentive is being handed out NOW.  You can't convince me that a red hot area like Briarcliff needs TIF to make these things happen now.  They WANT IT but they sure as hell don't NEED IT.  The occupancy rate testifies to that.
And they claim that nothing like this would happen in Briarcliff without GIGAKOK-TIF XR2000. To suggest this about an economically thriving area is either entirely erroneous, or indicative that a hotel and office building probably don't belong there in any case.

Crooked crooked crooked.
LenexatoKCMO
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
Location: Valentine

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by LenexatoKCMO »

bahua wrote: To suggest this about an economically thriving area is either entirely erroneous, or indicative that a hotel and office building probably don't belong there in any case.
Either that or we have finally reached the zero hour where no development will ever happen anywhere, no matter how economically lucrative its promiss, unless it receives public subsidy.  Sadly this seems to be the direction developers are steering things. 
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17302
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Briarcliff Village

Post by GRID »

LenexatoKCMO wrote: Yeah they are looking to get a load more TIF for more retail and a hotel.  That is why people are up in arms.  Brirarcliff is way past the needing public support stage.  Plus the additional hotel rooms on the wrong side of the river seem pretty questionable. 
I see, yea, that development should have some good legs now to start paying taxes on any expansions.  I also didn't know it was a "super" tiff.  Those are nearly as aggressive as KS Star bonds and should only be used in the most deserving circumstances, ie, building a new mixed use development over bannister mall, H&R Bock HQ etc.

I like the Briarcliff development though and it's better than some of the tiffs that KCMO and other burbs hand out.

There is a new development in the works for 435 and 169.  It's HUGE HUGE HUGE and it will be tiffed too.  That's nuts.
Post Reply