There were some pretty big assumptions in this column, especially the comments about Google. Why would the UMKC guy say that we have been unsuccessful getting fiber to people who don't have it?
“When the community pushes for access for people who don't have it, that doesn't happen, at least not so far. It could give us an advantage in some information technology areas, but I think it's transitory.”
Transitory I can buy, but seeing as how only around a few dozen homes probably have Google Fiber, it isn't really fair to say we have been unsuccessful in spreading fiber to new areas. The efforts from community activists and those on this very forum are proof (to me) that qualifying certain hoods was a win in this arena.
Also, what leads STL to think that they would be targeted for Google Fiber within a reasonable timeframe? At Google's current pace, the very earliest one would expect a rollout there would probably be closer to 5 years (that number is pulled from thin air). This will remain a metro-wide advantage until STL finds another company to rollout similar speeds or until STL waits out the clock on a very unpredictable Google. Probably more consideration than this article deserves, though. It is one of those backhanded complement articles that is really just written to motivate people in STL to keep the city what is in their minds better than KC.