TIME TO FREAK OUT AGAIN ABOUT CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT! THE BIG 12 IS DEAD! MAYBE!
-
- Western Auto Lofts
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Waldo, KC, MO
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
My intial thought = Yikes. Although I wouldn't mind having the big bully TX out of the Big 12.
- dangerboy
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 9029
- Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
- Location: West 39th St. - KCMO
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
I doubt it. There would still be three Big 12 schools left in Texas, and the current management sounds very entrenched in Dallas.KCMax wrote: Maybe we could get the HQ back
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
Pac-10 "very seriously" looking at expansion
The two obvious choices are Colorado and Utah. But back about the time Colorado hooked up with the Big 12 in the mid '90s, a dance between Colorado and the Pac-10 ended with a terse statement that the school was happy staying put.
That may have changed. But is it more profitable for Colorado to be in the Big 12 or the Pac-10, which hasn't put a second football team into a BCS bowl since 2002?
A well-placed source on the college landscape says that a bit before Scott came to the Pac-10, the league had an analysis done of expansion possibilities and concluded that a Colorado-Utah addition didn't really do all that much. And that realistically, nothing short of Texas would.
-
- City Center Square
- Posts: 12674
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
Given that the Big 10 and the PAC 10 may expand, and may take a few Big 12 teams, where will that leave the Big 12? What about some of the other conferences and their expansion plans?
The Big 12 better get out in front of this or its future may be bleak.
The Big 12 better get out in front of this or its future may be bleak.
I may be right. I may be wrong. But there is a lot of gray area in-between.
-
- Western Auto Lofts
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Waldo, KC, MO
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
Huskers perspective on this for anyone interested. In any event...
http://huskerextra.com/articles/2010/02 ... 452790.txt
http://huskerextra.com/articles/2010/02 ... 452790.txt
- Highlander
- City Center Square
- Posts: 10257
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
.
Last edited by Highlander on Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:50 pm
- Location: JoCo
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
It's my understanding the UT would make a considerable amount more from just simply switching to the Big 10. I believe all big 10 schools get around $22 million per school. That amount could increase if UT came with the Texas television market. Even if it's evenly split between all 12 big 10 schools. The real question is whether or not UT would be willing to split anything evenly..considering they don't need to currently.
Also, UT could play A&M in the non-con.
To be honest, if UT wanted to leave I wouldn't shed a tear. They've always looked out for their own interest.
Also, UT could play A&M in the non-con.
To be honest, if UT wanted to leave I wouldn't shed a tear. They've always looked out for their own interest.
-
- City Center Square
- Posts: 14667
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
- Location: Valentine
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
I am really skeptical that UT makes significantly more money in the B10. They already make more $$ than any school in the country - how much of that is due to the unbalanced revenue sharing in the B12? UT is in exactly the opposite position of MU - increased revenue sharing in a more profitable league could well be a net decrease in their individual haul.skim82 wrote: It's my understanding the UT would make a considerable amount more from just simply switching to the Big 10. I believe all big 10 schools get around $22 million per school. That amount could increase if UT came with the Texas television market. Even if it's evenly split between all 12 big 10 schools. The real question is whether or not UT would be willing to split anything evenly..considering they don't need to currently.
Also, UT could play A&M in the non-con.
To be honest, if UT wanted to leave I wouldn't shed a tear. They've always looked out for their own interest.
-
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1828
- Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:24 pm
- Contact:
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
-
- City Center Square
- Posts: 14667
- Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 3:34 pm
- Location: Valentine
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
If they go after CU, will they get Colorado State? Seems like the P10 wouldn't be the same if they got rid of their tradition of regional rival pairs. That's why I thought Utah/BYU made good sense.KCMax wrote: Krieger: If the Pac-10 calls, Buffs must listen
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
I think we are seeing that tradition really doesn't matter much in college athletics, or at least, takes a huge backseat to money.LenexatoKCMO wrote: If they go after CU, will they get Colorado State? Seems like the P10 wouldn't be the same if they got rid of their tradition of regional rival pairs. That's why I thought Utah/BYU made good sense.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:50 pm
- Location: JoCo
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
I also think that Utah/BYU would be a much better overall fit for the Pac10 in terms of expansion. However, adding BYU does have a religious aspect that has to be taken into account.LenexatoKCMO wrote: If they go after CU, will they get Colorado State? Seems like the P10 wouldn't be the same if they got rid of their tradition of regional rival pairs. That's why I thought Utah/BYU made good sense.
As for CSU, let's face it, they have awhile to go. Hughes is never full, and I don't even know about their basketball arena. They are just now in the process of building respectable facilities for football. The advantages CSU brings is a growing area (front range) and a decent sized student population.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:50 pm
- Location: JoCo
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
Lenexa, you're right. I meant that UT would make more money in the Big 10 than the Big 12 if revenue was shared evenly amongst all schools in the Big10 vs. Big12. Their media markets are much larger.LenexatoKCMO wrote: I am really skeptical that UT makes significantly more money in the B10. They already make more $$ than any school in the country - how much of that is due to the unbalanced revenue sharing in the B12? UT is in exactly the opposite position of MU - increased revenue sharing in a more profitable league could well be a net decrease in their individual haul.
This is all of course considering that UT wants to share ANYTHING. That is the problem we keep running into with UT. Texas is like being addicted to some horrible drug. We know we need to quit, but we keep stabbing our veins with burnt orange venom.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
I don't understand what the religious aspect is everyone talks about. BYU can't play sports on Sunday. So what? Are sports required to be played on Sundays in other conferences? Can this not be accommodated? More importantly, is there any reason the Pac Ten cannot accommodate this while the Mountain West has apparently done so for years?skim82 wrote: I also think that Utah/BYU would be a much better overall fit for the Pac10 in terms of expansion. However, adding BYU does have a religious aspect that has to be taken into account.
Last edited by KCMax on Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1300
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:50 pm
- Location: JoCo
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
Well, since some championship games are played on Sundays, that could be an issue. Also, I don't believe they even travel on Sundays if I'm not mistaken.
Also, many BYU student athletes (if not all) do some sort of missionary trip while enrolled at BYU. That's why you get 24 or 25 year old juniors and sophomores at BYU.
Other than that, not really too many other problems. It's just the fact that you're blending state schools and two private (USC, Stanford) with BYU which is absolutely without a doubt a religious institution. We may not care, but someone from Stanford could. Just sayin.
Also, many BYU student athletes (if not all) do some sort of missionary trip while enrolled at BYU. That's why you get 24 or 25 year old juniors and sophomores at BYU.
Other than that, not really too many other problems. It's just the fact that you're blending state schools and two private (USC, Stanford) with BYU which is absolutely without a doubt a religious institution. We may not care, but someone from Stanford could. Just sayin.
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3454
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:11 pm
- Location: Phoenix
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
I couldn't see tradition making much of a difference at this point, but what could keep the local rivalry thing in place, in the case of Utah/BYU, may be state legislatures. The legislature may not allow one to go without the other. Now, in the case of Colorado, the legislature may see a move to the Pac 10 as a good move for both teams, as it may open the door to CSU to the Big XII.KCMax wrote: I think we are seeing that tradition really doesn't matter much in college athletics, or at least, takes a huge backseat to money.
-
- Ambassador
- Posts: 7477
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
Pac 10, because of the huge travel distance, tries to pair trips for basketball. So Arizona and Arazona St would travel to Washington and play Washington and Wash St. on one weekend. Often times one of those games will be on a Sunday.KCMax wrote: I don't understand what the religious aspect is everyone talks about. BYU can't play sports on Sunday. So what? Are sports required to be played on Sundays in other conferences? Can this not be accommodated? More importantly, is there any reason the Pac Ten cannot accommodate this while the Mountain West has apparently done so for years?
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
BYU is a private school though. I don't see how the legislature would have any control over it.phxcat wrote: I couldn't see tradition making much of a difference at this point, but what could keep the local rivalry thing in place, in the case of Utah/BYU, may be state legislatures. The legislature may not allow one to go without the other. Now, in the case of Colorado, the legislature may see a move to the Pac 10 as a good move for both teams, as it may open the door to CSU to the Big XII.
So just make it a Saturday game instead? How hard is that? The Pac Ten championship is on a Saturday, so that is not an issue (Women's is on a Sunday...so just reschedule future tournaments so that it ends on a Saturday)shinatoo wrote: Pac 10, because of the huge travel distance, tries to pair trips for basketball. So Arizona and Arazona St would travel to Washington and play Washington and Wash St. on one weekend. Often times one of those games will be on a Sunday.
I don't really see BYU's religious angle being much of a hang-up if the Pac Ten really wants em.
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3454
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2002 5:11 pm
- Location: Phoenix
Re: Mizzou to the Big Ten?
They wouldn't have direct control, but depending on the number of representatives from BYU in the legislature, I could see them blocking Utah's move.