Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Discuss items in the urban core outside of Downtown as described above. Everything in the core including the east side (18th & Vine area), Northeast, Plaza, Westport, Brookside, Valentine, Waldo, 39th street, & the entire midtown area.
Post Reply
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7628
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by shinatoo »

I like Studio Gang (but not the south facade of the main building). I like the street activation of WHY (video was pretty cheesy). And Weise in that order. Kudos to Kengo Kuma for the education building and general aesthetic.

The designs that take attention away from the original building get low marks.

Studio Gang with something like WHY or Weise on the south facade.
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10542
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by Highlander »

beautyfromashes wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 3:06 pm 3. Weiss - This seems to balance the previous extension, wrapping around the south lawn. It also would provide a great new entrance that would make it easier and clearer for people walking from the Plaza to the museum.
I like this one for the reasons you state. It provides a nice symmetry with the existing extension.

I do like the street level interaction and wow factor, however, of the WHY proposal in that it offers something that's kind of grand but doesn't detract from the ambience of the original Nelson building. Studio's proposal is great at first glance but I think it risks obscuring the grandeur of the original building.
User avatar
im2kull
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4147
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by im2kull »

Highlander wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:13 pm
beautyfromashes wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 3:06 pm 3. Weiss - This seems to balance the previous extension, wrapping around the south lawn. It also would provide a great new entrance that would make it easier and clearer for people walking from the Plaza to the museum.
I like this one for the reasons you state. It provides a nice symmetry with the existing extension.

I do like the street level interaction and wow factor, however, of the WHY proposal in that it offers something that's kind of grand but doesn't detract from the ambience of the original Nelson building. Studio's proposal is great at first glance but I think it risks obscuring the grandeur of the original building.
Same. At first it looks a bit like a 70's school design. BUT, the way it uses the North quarter of the property and leaves the South ripe for any of the other designs to be added in the future is a win. On top of the actual volume it adds. I can't see doing a renovation this expensive to simply get a few shade areas added, or anything less than some major SF.

That said it should be these three:
1. Why
2. Selldorf
3. Weiss

The rest don't really matter.
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3118
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by TheLastGentleman »

Kengo Kuma and Associates

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Image
Kengo Kuma

Renzo Piano Building Workshop

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Image
Renzo Piano

Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Image
Selldorf Architects

Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Image
Studio Gang

Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

Image
Weiss/Manfredi

WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture

Image
WHY Architecture
langosta
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by langosta »

think Why’s proposal involves the existing Nelson structure too much to be within budget. Looks like they want to add an entire floor + build up to the foundations around most of the perimeter. That will be a mess for many years.

The other proposals seem to only put a sun shade on the Nelson’s roof if anythinf vs. WHY created enclosed spaces.

If you look closely, WHY wants to encapsulate the northern facade behind a half-height glass wall. I am very much not a fan of that element.
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7908
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by beautyfromashes »

langosta wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 10:51 pm think Why’s proposal involves the existing Nelson structure too much to be within budget. Looks like they want to add an entire floor + build up to the foundations around most of the perimeter. That will be a mess for many years.

The other proposals seem to only put a sun shade on the Nelson’s roof if anythinf vs. WHY created enclosed spaces.
Agree, but I think you get much more return for the Why proposal. If there is an event space on that roof, it would be an instant top for any wedding venue location. I think it would bring the donation dollars to provide the extra cost. Adding an extra floor might allow you to complete existing infrastructure upgrades to the main building at the same time. You'd have to bump up your HVAC and electrical and water. I don't know how long it's been since that's been completed but might provide new space and upgrades at the same time.
langosta
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by langosta »

beautyfromashes wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 10:55 pm
langosta wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 10:51 pm think Why’s proposal involves the existing Nelson structure too much to be within budget. Looks like they want to add an entire floor + build up to the foundations around most of the perimeter. That will be a mess for many years.

The other proposals seem to only put a sun shade on the Nelson’s roof if anythinf vs. WHY created enclosed spaces.
Agree, but I think you get much more return for the Why proposal. If there is an event space on that roof, it would be an instant top for any wedding venue location. I think it would bring the donation dollars to provide the extra cost. Adding an extra floor might allow you to complete existing infrastructure upgrades to the main building at the same time. You'd have to bump up your HVAC and electrical and water. I don't know how long it's been since that's been completed but might provide new space and upgrades at the same time.
But other proposals activate the roof without blocking one of the N/S facades?
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7908
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by beautyfromashes »

langosta wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 11:19 pm But other proposals activate the roof without blocking one of the N/S facades?
You mean Weiss?
langosta
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by langosta »

beautyfromashes wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 7:09 am
langosta wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 11:19 pm But other proposals activate the roof without blocking one of the N/S facades?
You mean Weiss?
A yes! Weiss activates the rooftop without blocking one of the N/S facades. I prefer them.
herrfrank
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 716
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:12 pm

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by herrfrank »

I like the Kengo plan -- I also think they have identified space for specific expansion requirements, which I am not sure was done with several of the alternatives. As long as the new roofline is below the west-side viewshed/ elevation, I don't think Kengo will cut off the perspective to the historic main building. Kengo also "activates" the historic building roof, although not aggressively.

I also like that it has a completely different architectural style to the classical and postmodernist structures. The Selldorf proposal I think will look shabby in ten years, like a strip mall. I like the Weiss proposal second.

I do not like the two proposals that look like an excavation of the southern slope.
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7908
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by beautyfromashes »

langosta wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 7:55 am
beautyfromashes wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 7:09 am
langosta wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 11:19 pm But other proposals activate the roof without blocking one of the N/S facades?
You mean Weiss?
A yes! Weiss activates the rooftop without blocking one of the N/S facades. I prefer them.
I liked the Weiss plan as well. I listed it at #3. I think I like Why a little more because they seem to use the same materials as the Block lanterns. I think that is a nice touch that will further connect the old to the new portions of the museum. Both great. I'd be happy with four of the six options.
langosta
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by langosta »

herrfrank wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 8:09 am I like the Kengo plan -- I also think they have identified space for specific expansion requirements, which I am not sure was done with several of the alternatives. As long as the new roofline is below the west-side viewshed/ elevation, I don't think Kengo will cut off the perspective to the historic main building. Kengo also "activates" the historic building roof, although not aggressively.

I also like that it has a completely different architectural style to the classical and postmodernist structures. The Selldorf proposal I think will look shabby in ten years, like a strip mall. I like the Weiss proposal second.

I do not like the two proposals that look like an excavation of the southern slope.
Excavating the slope could be interesting. Could make the original building feel taller and more stately. Excited to see the in person models
langosta
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by langosta »

Interesting, I just realized Weiss did the previous Theis Park and Brush Creek redesign studies in ~2015.

https://www.weissmanfredi.com/projects/ ... s-district
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2358
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by rxlexi »

Finally had a chance to review these proposals more thoroughly; thanks to those that posted the link to the competition site as well as brought all of the renderings into the thread.

Kengo Kuma is my favorite, by far. It is the most elegant; the view from the west is iconic with the sloping roofs, and it leaves the old building mostly untouched and highly visible. I love the use of stone and wood, especially in the Rockhill neighborhood with its many stone walls throughout.

Second is Wiess/Manfredi. A nice modern complement to the Bloch building that rounds out the campus.

Can't say I would be super thrilled with any of the others, although they all have their merits:

Gang's Art Bluff is a really cool idea but it seems like it could easily overpower from the south. Selldorf is interesting in the way it pulls to the north and frames that side, but looks too much like a classic "museum addition" box. Piano is elegant, airy and open, but completely changes/covers the north and south facades. WHY is similar with the "hug" concept.
langosta
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2956
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 am

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by langosta »

rxlexi wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 2:29 pm Finally had a chance to review these proposals more thoroughly; thanks to those that posted the link to the competition site as well as brought all of the renderings into the thread.

Kengo Kuma is my favorite, by far. It is the most elegant; the view from the west is iconic with the sloping roofs, and it leaves the old building mostly untouched and highly visible. I love the use of stone and wood, especially in the Rockhill neighborhood with its many stone walls throughout.

Second is Wiess/Manfredi. A nice modern complement to the Bloch building that rounds out the campus.

Can't say I would be super thrilled with any of the others, although they all have their merits:

Gang's Art Bluff is a really cool idea but it seems like it could easily overpower from the south. Selldorf is interesting in the way it pulls to the north and frames that side, but looks too much like a classic "museum addition" box. Piano is elegant, airy and open, but completely changes/covers the north and south facades. WHY is similar with the "hug" concept.
Kengo does cover the north facade which is hard for me to get over
MidtownCat
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1965
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: ~Westwood~

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by MidtownCat »

The Kengo Kuma submission is the only one worthy of an International Design competition.

The others are flat out embarrassing.

The fact that WHY and Gang's submissions were even shortlisted is a total joke. Any firm that disrupted the viewshed of the iconic South facade should have been summarily dismissed.

The quality of the work across the board is really shocking, to be completely honest.
Last edited by MidtownCat on Wed Mar 19, 2025 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2358
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by rxlexi »

langosta wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 2:41 pm Kengo does cover the north facade which is hard for me to get over
Only very lightly, with the almost porch-like structure up to the front doors (and not all the way across the facade). They also open up the wall behind the front columns with glass (as do a few others).

Some of the others literally put large buildings in front of the facade(s).
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2358
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by rxlexi »

Also, is anyone surprised Holl wasn't brought back as an option? The overall composition of the campus would be more cohesive with just about anything his team would do vs. another "starchitect" brand.
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5893
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by moderne »

The board has said that the final product would incorporate and adapt the best ideas and solutions from all the entries. Whoever is chosen I am almost sure will have some sort of connector under the south terrace to connect Bloch/Holl with new space on the west.
MidtownCat
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1965
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: ~Westwood~

Re: Nelson Atkins - Moving Forward

Post by MidtownCat »

rxlexi wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 3:20 pm Also, is anyone surprised Holl wasn't brought back as an option? The overall composition of the campus would be more cohesive with just about anything his team would do vs. another "starchitect" brand.
Kengo Kuma's submission is the only one that creates any harmonious balance with Holl's expansion, which was all about respecting the great lawn and the Nelson Atkins original building as a formal edifice.

It's honestly incredible to see how amateurish the majority of the submissions were.
Post Reply