Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
-
- Western Auto Lofts
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:12 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
I love the old Plaza tennis courts, but they have had their day. My parents lived in the Melbourne (303 Brush Creek Blvd) in the 1950s - early 1960s -- they played probably there once per week. By the late 1970s when I was playing at Homestead, the Plaza Courts had already become unfashionable. Then a big renovation in the 1980s, "Tennis Center" badging, but the parade quickly passed by.
Within biking distance are the Carriage Club courts; the enormous Woodside Racquet Club, plus a few public courts sprinkled here and there.
The Plaza is an urban retail district with high-rise living -- a few courts should be nearby but it does not need to be a major focus. I haven't heard similar outrage that there are no large swimming pools in the immediate area. There are modest swimming facilities (again mostly private), and the demand appears to be satisfied.
Within biking distance are the Carriage Club courts; the enormous Woodside Racquet Club, plus a few public courts sprinkled here and there.
The Plaza is an urban retail district with high-rise living -- a few courts should be nearby but it does not need to be a major focus. I haven't heard similar outrage that there are no large swimming pools in the immediate area. There are modest swimming facilities (again mostly private), and the demand appears to be satisfied.
- Highlander
- City Center Square
- Posts: 10373
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
It's not casual match play that I am concerned about. It's the city having a suitable public venue where they can hold large metro-wide tournaments which means a lot of courts at a single location, parking, some kind of a pro shop and lighting. And there is the issue of UMKC and Rockhurst using the courts for their practices and matches. I am good with relocating them but it's not something a few courts in another park or private venues can accommodateherrfrank wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2024 9:43 am I love the old Plaza tennis courts, but they have had their day. My parents lived in the Melbourne (303 Brush Creek Blvd) in the 1950s - early 1960s -- they played probably there once per week. By the late 1970s when I was playing at Homestead, the Plaza Courts had already become unfashionable. Then a big renovation in the 1980s, "Tennis Center" badging, but the parade quickly passed by.
Within biking distance are the Carriage Club courts; the enormous Woodside Racquet Club, plus a few public courts sprinkled here and there.
The Plaza is an urban retail district with high-rise living -- a few courts should be nearby but it does not need to be a major focus. I haven't heard similar outrage that there are no large swimming pools in the immediate area. There are modest swimming facilities (again mostly private), and the demand appears to be satisfied.
- Critical_Mass
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Union Hill
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Why is losing some tennis courts getting more push back than losing the 100+ year old church building?
- Midtownkid
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3061
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 4:27 pm
- Location: North Volker, KCMO
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Probably because we all own the tennis courts and we had no real say over the church.Critical_Mass wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:47 am Why is losing some tennis courts getting more push back than losing the 100+ year old church building?
I'm not happy about the church demo and I'm not happy about the prospect of losing the courts.
They put the "Country Club" in Country Club Plaza.
-
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
MIght be an unpopular opinion but I'd take the 5 over 1 instead of the tennis courts. I go by those courts everyday and they're almost always empty. If we could make it look good enough an apartment could be great, especially if it could contain a convenience store.
-
- Parking Garage
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:03 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
I agree it's a shame the church was demolished, but it was not 100-plus years old. It opened in 1942.
- FangKC
- City Hall
- Posts: 18745
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
What is your point? Under National Trust guidelines, a building mustn't be 100 years old to be considered historic. The church would have met the guidelines because it was 82 years old.
The Flashcube Building was completed in 1974 and received historic designation and tax credits in 2017 even though it had not yet reached the traditional 50-year mark to be considered historic--seven years before the traditional age limit.
The church is 32 years older than the Flashcube.
https://flatlandkc.org/news-issues/flas ... t-project/
IMO, Historic Tax Credits shouldn't have been applied for the Flashcube Building because it has not yet met the National Trust's guidelines. Since tax credits are highly sought and rationed, it pushed ahead of much older buildings being selected, and perhaps ones that were much more imperiled. That is why I opposed it.
Some other financing methods should have been used. Of course, they could have waited until 2024 to apply when the building would have met the minimum guidelines.
The Flashcube Building was completed in 1974 and received historic designation and tax credits in 2017 even though it had not yet reached the traditional 50-year mark to be considered historic--seven years before the traditional age limit.
The church is 32 years older than the Flashcube.
https://flatlandkc.org/news-issues/flas ... t-project/
IMO, Historic Tax Credits shouldn't have been applied for the Flashcube Building because it has not yet met the National Trust's guidelines. Since tax credits are highly sought and rationed, it pushed ahead of much older buildings being selected, and perhaps ones that were much more imperiled. That is why I opposed it.
Some other financing methods should have been used. Of course, they could have waited until 2024 to apply when the building would have met the minimum guidelines.
Last edited by FangKC on Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- taxi
- Penntower
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
- Location: S. Plaza
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
I think a more important point is that the building had the potential to last much, much longer. I watched it come down, and it was built like a brick, um, it was well-built.
- GRID
- City Hall
- Posts: 17585
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Depends on how well designed it is. Throwing anything in there is not worth it. There are so many empty lots to build on.TheUrbanRoo wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2024 4:32 pm MIght be an unpopular opinion but I'd take the 5 over 1 instead of the tennis courts. I go by those courts everyday and they're almost always empty. If we could make it look good enough an apartment could be great, especially if it could contain a convenience store.
- Cratedigger
- Penntower
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Lot to like in here
https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/a ... 98720.html
Have always thought the Barnes and noble was over built. Like the idea of taking it to 8000 sq ft and replacing it with something else.
The roundabouts with fountains will become landmarks.
If well designed a luxury hotel in the center would be neat too. Hopefully the public agrees?
Lastly, looks like the grocery store will be more of a smaller Dean and Deluca vibe (I would bet it’s something like Berkeley’s Market in Dallas if you’re familiar) than Trader Joe’s. Would be great in my opinion
https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/a ... 98720.html
Have always thought the Barnes and noble was over built. Like the idea of taking it to 8000 sq ft and replacing it with something else.
The roundabouts with fountains will become landmarks.
If well designed a luxury hotel in the center would be neat too. Hopefully the public agrees?
Lastly, looks like the grocery store will be more of a smaller Dean and Deluca vibe (I would bet it’s something like Berkeley’s Market in Dallas if you’re familiar) than Trader Joe’s. Would be great in my opinion
- LCDSI
- New York Life
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 8:47 pm
- Location: Leawood, Kansas
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
This all sounds very promising. I can't wait to see it in a few years. Very thankful we have them as the new owner.
- Chris Stritzel
- Broadway Square
- Posts: 2648
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Just what the doctor ordered.Cratedigger wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2024 7:29 am Lot to like in here
https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/a ... 98720.html
Have always thought the Barnes and noble was over built. Like the idea of taking it to 8000 sq ft and replacing it with something else.
The roundabouts with fountains will become landmarks.
If well designed a luxury hotel in the center would be neat too. Hopefully the public agrees?
Lastly, looks like the grocery store will be more of a smaller Dean and Deluca vibe (I would bet it’s something like Berkeley’s Market in Dallas if you’re familiar) than Trader Joe’s. Would be great in my opinion
-
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 5741
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
- Location: Mount Hope
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Better than I even hoped for. BTW, we already have had a Paseo for a century and quarter.
- Cratedigger
- Penntower
- Posts: 2109
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm
- Midtownkid
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3061
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 4:27 pm
- Location: North Volker, KCMO
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Love the vision shared so far. I really want to see some plans for the old Victoria Secret building and where Plaza III used to be. Those are pretty ugly buildings.
- GRID
- City Hall
- Posts: 17585
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
Wow, impressive. The Plaza about to get a major second life.
- rxlexi
- Penntower
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
- Location: Briarcliff
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
I read the article in the Star and I'm almost in disbelief at how positive it is. These guys are saying all the right things, all the way down to the little physical details (replacing flat roofs with angled and mansard spanish tile, for more special views out from the upper levels!). More than that, it's such an great feeling knowing they have the capital to back it up.
Removing chunks of retail for pedestrian promenades and outdoor space, bricking the streets and expanding the sidewalks (shaded by mature trees), placing a luxury hotel somewhere in the central bowl, the grand fountain roundabouts, the list goes on. And the conceptual rendering of the former Saks building looks amazing - imagine if the rest of the duller structures could be reimagined similarly.
It remains to be seen how much of this comes to fruition, but it continues to feel like this is a dream scenario for the rebirth of the Plaza and surrounds.
Removing chunks of retail for pedestrian promenades and outdoor space, bricking the streets and expanding the sidewalks (shaded by mature trees), placing a luxury hotel somewhere in the central bowl, the grand fountain roundabouts, the list goes on. And the conceptual rendering of the former Saks building looks amazing - imagine if the rest of the duller structures could be reimagined similarly.
It remains to be seen how much of this comes to fruition, but it continues to feel like this is a dream scenario for the rebirth of the Plaza and surrounds.
- GRID
- City Hall
- Posts: 17585
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
- Contact:
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
I never really noticed just has bland some of the plaza is.rxlexi wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2024 1:31 pm I read the article in the Star and I'm almost in disbelief at how positive it is. These guys are saying all the right things, all the way down to the little physical details (replacing flat roofs with angled and mansard spanish tile, for more special views out from the upper levels!). More than that, it's such an great feeling knowing they have the capital to back it up.
Removing chunks of retail for pedestrian promenades and outdoor space, bricking the streets and expanding the sidewalks (shaded by mature trees), placing a luxury hotel somewhere in the central bowl, the grand fountain roundabouts, the list goes on. And the conceptual rendering of the former Saks building looks amazing - imagine if the rest of the duller structures could be reimagined similarly.
It remains to be seen how much of this comes to fruition, but it continues to feel like this is a dream scenario for the rebirth of the Plaza and surrounds.
I mean this is a fascinating transformation from this https://www.google.com/maps/@39.0412894 ... FQAw%3D%3D
to this.
- TheLastGentleman
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3014
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
If you take a good hard look at how the plaza mall currently looks, less than half of the buildings are any good, to be blunt
-
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm
Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)
100%. I don't think myself, or many others, realized how bad and underwhelming the Plaza really was until after seeing this. But holy moly this is what we mean when we talk "transforming" or "revitalizing" an area if I've ever seen it before.
Most underrated thing to me is they're talking about removing the curbs. Huge, huge for the sense of feeling like a real Plaza.
Most underrated thing to me is they're talking about removing the curbs. Huge, huge for the sense of feeling like a real Plaza.