Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Discuss items in the urban core outside of Downtown as described above. Everything in the core including the east side (18th & Vine area), Northeast, Plaza, Westport, Brookside, Valentine, Waldo, 39th street, & the entire midtown area.
herrfrank
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:12 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by herrfrank »

I love the old Plaza tennis courts, but they have had their day. My parents lived in the Melbourne (303 Brush Creek Blvd) in the 1950s - early 1960s -- they played probably there once per week. By the late 1970s when I was playing at Homestead, the Plaza Courts had already become unfashionable. Then a big renovation in the 1980s, "Tennis Center" badging, but the parade quickly passed by.

Within biking distance are the Carriage Club courts; the enormous Woodside Racquet Club, plus a few public courts sprinkled here and there.

The Plaza is an urban retail district with high-rise living -- a few courts should be nearby but it does not need to be a major focus. I haven't heard similar outrage that there are no large swimming pools in the immediate area. There are modest swimming facilities (again mostly private), and the demand appears to be satisfied.
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10373
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Highlander »

herrfrank wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 9:43 am I love the old Plaza tennis courts, but they have had their day. My parents lived in the Melbourne (303 Brush Creek Blvd) in the 1950s - early 1960s -- they played probably there once per week. By the late 1970s when I was playing at Homestead, the Plaza Courts had already become unfashionable. Then a big renovation in the 1980s, "Tennis Center" badging, but the parade quickly passed by.

Within biking distance are the Carriage Club courts; the enormous Woodside Racquet Club, plus a few public courts sprinkled here and there.

The Plaza is an urban retail district with high-rise living -- a few courts should be nearby but it does not need to be a major focus. I haven't heard similar outrage that there are no large swimming pools in the immediate area. There are modest swimming facilities (again mostly private), and the demand appears to be satisfied.
It's not casual match play that I am concerned about. It's the city having a suitable public venue where they can hold large metro-wide tournaments which means a lot of courts at a single location, parking, some kind of a pro shop and lighting. And there is the issue of UMKC and Rockhurst using the courts for their practices and matches. I am good with relocating them but it's not something a few courts in another park or private venues can accommodate
User avatar
Critical_Mass
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1001
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Union Hill

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Critical_Mass »

Why is losing some tennis courts getting more push back than losing the 100+ year old church building?
User avatar
Midtownkid
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3061
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 4:27 pm
Location: North Volker, KCMO

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Midtownkid »

Critical_Mass wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:47 am Why is losing some tennis courts getting more push back than losing the 100+ year old church building?
Probably because we all own the tennis courts and we had no real say over the church.

I'm not happy about the church demo and I'm not happy about the prospect of losing the courts.

They put the "Country Club" in Country Club Plaza.
TheUrbanRoo
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1693
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

MIght be an unpopular opinion but I'd take the 5 over 1 instead of the tennis courts. I go by those courts everyday and they're almost always empty. If we could make it look good enough an apartment could be great, especially if it could contain a convenience store.
cityscenekc
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:03 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by cityscenekc »

I agree it's a shame the church was demolished, but it was not 100-plus years old. It opened in 1942.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18745
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by FangKC »

What is your point? Under National Trust guidelines, a building mustn't be 100 years old to be considered historic. The church would have met the guidelines because it was 82 years old.

The Flashcube Building was completed in 1974 and received historic designation and tax credits in 2017 even though it had not yet reached the traditional 50-year mark to be considered historic--seven years before the traditional age limit.

The church is 32 years older than the Flashcube.

https://flatlandkc.org/news-issues/flas ... t-project/

IMO, Historic Tax Credits shouldn't have been applied for the Flashcube Building because it has not yet met the National Trust's guidelines. Since tax credits are highly sought and rationed, it pushed ahead of much older buildings being selected, and perhaps ones that were much more imperiled. That is why I opposed it.

Some other financing methods should have been used. Of course, they could have waited until 2024 to apply when the building would have met the minimum guidelines.
Last edited by FangKC on Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
taxi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2132
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: S. Plaza

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by taxi »

I think a more important point is that the building had the potential to last much, much longer. I watched it come down, and it was built like a brick, um, it was well-built.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17585
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by GRID »

TheUrbanRoo wrote: Tue Sep 17, 2024 4:32 pm MIght be an unpopular opinion but I'd take the 5 over 1 instead of the tennis courts. I go by those courts everyday and they're almost always empty. If we could make it look good enough an apartment could be great, especially if it could contain a convenience store.
Depends on how well designed it is. Throwing anything in there is not worth it. There are so many empty lots to build on.
User avatar
Cratedigger
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Cratedigger »

Lot to like in here

https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/a ... 98720.html

Have always thought the Barnes and noble was over built. Like the idea of taking it to 8000 sq ft and replacing it with something else.

The roundabouts with fountains will become landmarks.

If well designed a luxury hotel in the center would be neat too. Hopefully the public agrees?

Lastly, looks like the grocery store will be more of a smaller Dean and Deluca vibe (I would bet it’s something like Berkeley’s Market in Dallas if you’re familiar) than Trader Joe’s. Would be great in my opinion
User avatar
LCDSI
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Leawood, Kansas

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by LCDSI »

This all sounds very promising. I can't wait to see it in a few years. Very thankful we have them as the new owner.
User avatar
Chris Stritzel
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Chris Stritzel »

Cratedigger wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 7:29 am Lot to like in here

https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/a ... 98720.html

Have always thought the Barnes and noble was over built. Like the idea of taking it to 8000 sq ft and replacing it with something else.

The roundabouts with fountains will become landmarks.

If well designed a luxury hotel in the center would be neat too. Hopefully the public agrees?

Lastly, looks like the grocery store will be more of a smaller Dean and Deluca vibe (I would bet it’s something like Berkeley’s Market in Dallas if you’re familiar) than Trader Joe’s. Would be great in my opinion
Just what the doctor ordered.
Image
Image
Image
Image
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5741
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by moderne »

Better than I even hoped for. BTW, we already have had a Paseo for a century and quarter.
User avatar
Cratedigger
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2109
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Cratedigger »

moderne wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 10:20 am Better than I even hoped for. BTW, we already have had a Paseo for a century and quarter.
Believe this is an intentional nod to that as well as a tie in to the spanish theme of the area
User avatar
Midtownkid
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3061
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 4:27 pm
Location: North Volker, KCMO

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by Midtownkid »

Love the vision shared so far. I really want to see some plans for the old Victoria Secret building and where Plaza III used to be. Those are pretty ugly buildings.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17585
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by GRID »

Wow, impressive. The Plaza about to get a major second life.
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2328
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by rxlexi »

I read the article in the Star and I'm almost in disbelief at how positive it is. These guys are saying all the right things, all the way down to the little physical details (replacing flat roofs with angled and mansard spanish tile, for more special views out from the upper levels!). More than that, it's such an great feeling knowing they have the capital to back it up.

Removing chunks of retail for pedestrian promenades and outdoor space, bricking the streets and expanding the sidewalks (shaded by mature trees), placing a luxury hotel somewhere in the central bowl, the grand fountain roundabouts, the list goes on. And the conceptual rendering of the former Saks building looks amazing - imagine if the rest of the duller structures could be reimagined similarly.

It remains to be seen how much of this comes to fruition, but it continues to feel like this is a dream scenario for the rebirth of the Plaza and surrounds.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17585
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by GRID »

rxlexi wrote: Fri Sep 20, 2024 1:31 pm I read the article in the Star and I'm almost in disbelief at how positive it is. These guys are saying all the right things, all the way down to the little physical details (replacing flat roofs with angled and mansard spanish tile, for more special views out from the upper levels!). More than that, it's such an great feeling knowing they have the capital to back it up.

Removing chunks of retail for pedestrian promenades and outdoor space, bricking the streets and expanding the sidewalks (shaded by mature trees), placing a luxury hotel somewhere in the central bowl, the grand fountain roundabouts, the list goes on. And the conceptual rendering of the former Saks building looks amazing - imagine if the rest of the duller structures could be reimagined similarly.

It remains to be seen how much of this comes to fruition, but it continues to feel like this is a dream scenario for the rebirth of the Plaza and surrounds.
I never really noticed just has bland some of the plaza is.

I mean this is a fascinating transformation from this https://www.google.com/maps/@39.0412894 ... FQAw%3D%3D

to this.

Image
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3014
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by TheLastGentleman »

If you take a good hard look at how the plaza mall currently looks, less than half of the buildings are any good, to be blunt
TheUrbanRoo
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1693
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Plaza move-ins (ongoing)

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

100%. I don't think myself, or many others, realized how bad and underwhelming the Plaza really was until after seeing this. But holy moly this is what we mean when we talk "transforming" or "revitalizing" an area if I've ever seen it before.

Most underrated thing to me is they're talking about removing the curbs. Huge, huge for the sense of feeling like a real Plaza.
Post Reply