I'd agree with this. Here is what has to happen if they do want this site:Chris Stritzel wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2024 9:14 pm Y'all best simmer down with the doomerism. Fuck me. Give it a little bit. You take a setback like this and act like it's the end of the world. And then some wonder why folks on the other side of the argument can't take the pro-downtown stadium folks seriously. I swear, negativity feeds off of negativity and that's on display here.
Royals have a pathway in the Crossroads:
- They reached that agreement with the neighborhood association and both parties signed it. Even though it would've gone into effect after a "yes" vote tonight, it's still a good thing to keep in hand and sign again later. It has a bunch of things in it folks wanted.
- They listened and agreed to keep Oak open. That was a major concern by many.
- They got an agreement with Resurrection Church to purchase the land owned by the Church and they can still buy the Printing Press. That leaves the other buildings fronting Grand.
All three were done too late to change the minds of voters.
Work on purchase contracts with the existing building owners that push them to start moving those businesses to as good or better locations when their leases are up. Remove the ability to say "We're killing small businesses."
Purchase and tear down the KC Star press building.
Donate money and generate enough other donors to build the 670 park.
Become seen in the Crossroads. Be part of First Fridays. Mend fences.
Develop an actual stadium plan instead of a placeholder.
Get financial visibility on where the money for the development will come from.
Get a nationally respected stadium and ancillary development company to run the program.
Become committed. Say more emphatically that there is no extension of the K lease.
Work on producing a better team on the field.