Sky and Cordish $253M project

Come here for discussion about the new downtown entertainment district.
Post Reply
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5518
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by moderne »

A 500 unit apartment building on that site would be at least 30 floors.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1310
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

Wow. Before 4L…now that is some big breaking news on this site…
User avatar
Chris Stritzel
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by Chris Stritzel »

I thought the 500 units are split between two parcels. Not saying this means the buildings will be short or anything, but if each side of the street gets 250 each, then you could have two, 20-story buildings. Condensing all 500 into one building would be unheard of here (at least for right now).
User avatar
Cratedigger
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1849
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:32 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by Cratedigger »

DColeKC wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 1:41 pm
normalthings wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 11:58 am Next before 4 Light?
Yes.
But after Midland?
daGOAT
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:39 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by daGOAT »

Chris Stritzel wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:50 pm I thought the 500 units are split between two parcels. Not saying this means the buildings will be short or anything, but if each side of the street gets 250 each, then you could have two, 20-story buildings. Condensing all 500 into one building would be unheard of here (at least for right now).
This is what I have heard as well. Personally, rather see both parcels developed at around 20 floors with good ground floor activation. Would create a interesting staircase effect from the Crossroads, to the Light towers, and finally to the current tallest buildings on 12th Street.
User avatar
DColeKC
Ambassador
Posts: 3879
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 am

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by DColeKC »

Chris Stritzel wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:50 pm I thought the 500 units are split between two parcels. Not saying this means the buildings will be short or anything, but if each side of the street gets 250 each, then you could have two, 20-story buildings. Condensing all 500 into one building would be unheard of here (at least for right now).
Yeah, I didn't think it was supposed to be a 20+ story development but wondering how you fit 800 parking spots and 500 units on 1.5 acres without going up?
User avatar
DColeKC
Ambassador
Posts: 3879
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 am

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by DColeKC »

Cratedigger wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:57 pm
DColeKC wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 1:41 pm
normalthings wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 11:58 am Next before 4 Light?
Yes.
But after Midland?
Midland should be starting anytime, so this project could be happening at the same time.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33987
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by KCPowercat »

Shouldn't name it "sky" if it's not going to be tall. Just ripe for getting poked fun at.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by normalthings »

KCPowercat wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:08 pm Shouldn't name it "sky" if it's not going to be tall. Just ripe for getting poked fun at.
Sky is just the name of the co-developer iirc
trexel94
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 1:57 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by trexel94 »

There's supposed to be 85k sqft of office or retail space included as well.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1310
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

I'm still processing that is coming before 4L. Does that mean 4L isn't even close to coming?
User avatar
DColeKC
Ambassador
Posts: 3879
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 am

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by DColeKC »

UMKC Roo wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:21 pm I'm still processing that is coming before 4L. Does that mean 4L isn't even close to coming?
It's in the early design stages and is in the pipeline but this project makes more sense to get started next.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33987
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by KCPowercat »

normalthings wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:11 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:08 pm Shouldn't name it "sky" if it's not going to be tall. Just ripe for getting poked fun at.
Sky is just the name of the co-developer iirc
okay. point remains.
User avatar
Chris Stritzel
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by Chris Stritzel »

DColeKC wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:07 pm
Chris Stritzel wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 2:50 pm I thought the 500 units are split between two parcels. Not saying this means the buildings will be short or anything, but if each side of the street gets 250 each, then you could have two, 20-story buildings. Condensing all 500 into one building would be unheard of here (at least for right now).
Yeah, I didn't think it was supposed to be a 20+ story development but wondering how you fit 800 parking spots and 500 units on 1.5 acres without going up?
Parking could always be reduced (and should be). If 500 spaces were built for 1:1 apartment parking, I guarantee over 100 of those would be constantly vacant, then you could offer some public parking. 800 seems like overkill considering all the parking nearby. And unless the parking garage entrance and exits were on Truman Road, I imagine the Streetcar authority would oppose entrances and exits on Main (prevent backups). I’m sure Cordish and their architect have this being worked out.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17159
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by GRID »

I'm surprised Cordish would do this before Four Light or whatever because I thought the towers in the original plan were already approved for incentives. The Light buildings all got basically free parking structures which are like 20 million each or something like that. Are they going to get anywhere near such incentives for this project? It just seems like Cordish would have more to gain (profit) by building the next Light tower.
User avatar
DColeKC
Ambassador
Posts: 3879
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 am

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by DColeKC »

GRID wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:20 am I'm surprised Cordish would do this before Four Light or whatever because I thought the towers in the original plan were already approved for incentives. The Light buildings all got basically free parking structures which are like 20 million each or something like that. Are they going to get anywhere near such incentives for this project? It just seems like Cordish would have more to gain (profit) by building the next Light tower.
I think the 80,000 square feet of retail could be the driving factor and the ability to offer a more affordable mix of apartments. Which they may feel is more likely to fill up over the next several years.

Possibility of four light including a high end hotel likely factors in and four light has always been planned to be the most prominent building in stature and height.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33987
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by KCPowercat »

Yes retail is obviously Cordish strength
cityscenekc
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:03 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by cityscenekc »

This is not just a Cordish development proposal, Sky Real Estate and J.E. Dunn also are involved: https://cityscenekc.com/downtown-apartm ... -deadline/
User avatar
DColeKC
Ambassador
Posts: 3879
Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 am

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by DColeKC »

KCPowercat wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 10:25 am Yes retail is obviously Cordish strength
It is nationwide. Not to mention 80,000 sqft is just about right for a big retailer.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: Sky and Cordish $253M project

Post by normalthings »

Why push 4 Light forward if they are also doing this? Maybe this is going forward as retail + office?
Post Reply