I noticed. The recent cases prove that incentivized projects are having a much harder time (as we all know).normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:58 pmNotice that 2 of 3 are not incentivized and the 3rd is only moving again because they are getting incentives under the pre-ordinance rulesChris Stritzel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:56 pm Of those, only 4711 Belleview/Dylan was totally dead. Ashland just got delayed and changed hands. 3rd and Grand never died. Like the Lux Riverfront project, it just had to go through some side process before it could remerge. I believe that the same is happening to Mac's deal at Main and Armour.
3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
- Chris Stritzel
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
- AlkaliAxel
- Penntower
- Posts: 2311
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:58 pm
- Location: West Plaza
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
Yes. I think we all agree the incentive changes aren't great. But we're making pretty good with what we've got so far from what I can tell. It's been 1.5 years since they voted to change incentive rules.Chris Stritzel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:03 pmI noticed. The recent cases prove that incentivized projects are having a much harder time (as we all know).normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:58 pmNotice that 2 of 3 are not incentivized and the 3rd is only moving again because they are getting incentives under the pre-ordinance rulesChris Stritzel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:56 pm Of those, only 4711 Belleview/Dylan was totally dead. Ashland just got delayed and changed hands. 3rd and Grand never died. Like the Lux Riverfront project, it just had to go through some side process before it could remerge. I believe that the same is happening to Mac's deal at Main and Armour.
- normalthings
- One Park Place
- Posts: 6948
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
A momentum has stalled….. the number of projects has slowed quit a bit. Other cities have seen a lot of proposal, we haven’t really seen all that many tbhAlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:25 amYes. I think we all agree the incentive changes aren't great. But we're making pretty good with what we've got so far from what I can tell. It's been 1.5 years since they voted to change incentive rules.Chris Stritzel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:03 pmI noticed. The recent cases prove that incentivized projects are having a much harder time (as we all know).normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:58 pm
Notice that 2 of 3 are not incentivized and the 3rd is only moving again because they are getting incentives under the pre-ordinance rules
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
^Permit momentum slowed down for KC metro overall, not just KCMO. But still in top 25 for YTD. We may see a catchup if such stalled projects move forward.
May Metro Permits

https://www.census.gov/construction/bps ... 202205.xls
May Metro Permits
https://www.census.gov/construction/bps ... 202205.xls
-
- Ambassador
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 9:16 pm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
It's hard for me to see any new projects going through PIEA that would be subject to the affordability rules (i.e., not grandfathered into the old rules). Excepting those projects that are explicitly low-income (tax credit projects, etc.). Until then, you'll see the Port and RideKC seeing all new development requests. Kevin O'Neill has to be loving his current situation as THE power broker downtown.AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:25 amYes. I think we all agree the incentive changes aren't great. But we're making pretty good with what we've got so far from what I can tell. It's been 1.5 years since they voted to change incentive rules.Chris Stritzel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:03 pmI noticed. The recent cases prove that incentivized projects are having a much harder time (as we all know).normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 9:58 pm
Notice that 2 of 3 are not incentivized and the 3rd is only moving again because they are getting incentives under the pre-ordinance rules
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
This is how I see it looking at things from the outside. Developers are going to have to jump through some major hoops and probably still have to go through the Port Authority etc. Major projects under this new affordable housing rule and with an anti development city council will be nearly impossible to get done. Especially in a city like KC where rents are still low and costs to build are rising.CrossroadsUrbanApts wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:32 amIt's hard for me to see any new projects going through PIEA that would be subject to the affordability rules (i.e., not grandfathered into the old rules). Excepting those projects that are explicitly low-income (tax credit projects, etc.). Until then, you'll see the Port and RideKC seeing all new development requests. Kevin O'Neill has to be loving his current situation as THE power broker downtown.AlkaliAxel wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 12:25 amYes. I think we all agree the incentive changes aren't great. But we're making pretty good with what we've got so far from what I can tell. It's been 1.5 years since they voted to change incentive rules.Chris Stritzel wrote: ↑Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:03 pm
I noticed. The recent cases prove that incentivized projects are having a much harder time (as we all know).
I wish the city council there could understand that even with the tax breaks, most urban development makes financial sense.
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
Kevin O'Neil's "streetcar is an incentive" is the most laughable propaganda I have heard among the current council members by far lol.CrossroadsUrbanApts wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 9:32 am Kevin O'Neill has to be loving his current situation as THE power broker downtown.
Thank God the election is coming up! We just gotta make sure the right changes are made.
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
KC seriously lagging in 5 plus units.... not a good look but could easily change.earthling wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:46 am ^Permit momentum slowed down for KC metro overall, not just KCMO. But still in top 25 for YTD. We may see a catchup if such stalled projects move forward.
May Metro Permits
https://www.census.gov/construction/bps ... 202205.xls
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8009
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
^For the month, not for the year to date. It's somewhat common to have a low month some months.
History of permits (click on 5+ tab)...
https://www.recenter.tamu.edu/data/buil ... y%2C_MO-KS
KCMO might consider matching Minneapolis incentives programs. They also have an affordable requirement but not as strict as KC's IIRC and they are significantly attracting development even though rents are not rising as much.
History of permits (click on 5+ tab)...
https://www.recenter.tamu.edu/data/buil ... y%2C_MO-KS
KCMO might consider matching Minneapolis incentives programs. They also have an affordable requirement but not as strict as KC's IIRC and they are significantly attracting development even though rents are not rising as much.
- KCtoBrooklyn
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 4:01 pm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
This old rendering was the only one that was presented to the PIEA. I'm not sure if that is just a different side of the building than the above rendering, or a separate design. I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up with considerable changes from either of these.

- normalthings
- One Park Place
- Posts: 6948
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: 3rd & Grand to be redeveloped as TOD
Permits and proposals are also not the same thingdaGOAT wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:02 pmKC seriously lagging in 5 plus units.... not a good look but could easily change.earthling wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 7:46 am ^Permit momentum slowed down for KC metro overall, not just KCMO. But still in top 25 for YTD. We may see a catchup if such stalled projects move forward.
May Metro Permits
https://www.census.gov/construction/bps ... 202205.xls