I think it’s just become apparent at this point that we have alot more bias towards 18th and Vine here than in reality amongst the people/voters/anyone-outside-of-KcRag. It’s out of touch. I get it, this forum is about diehard KC people who adore KC’s history and everything. Theres not anytbing I can say that’s gonna change the emotional responses to Vine from this forum. Which probably explains why I’m not on board with it since I’m brand new here to the forum and I’m not entrenched like most everyone else here is towards things like Vine. But most people, unlike KCRag, aren’t as into KC history and culture like this forum is. There’s gonna be a bias towards Vine because of the KCRaggers here, and that can’t be competed with on a historical/cultural KC issue like Vine. So whatever, I’m not gonna argue about it anymore because it’s un-winnable on a forum here that’s made for KC enthusiasts/historians- but I have no doubt the average KC resident doesn’t have the same feelings that this forum does about Vine.
And don’t get me wrong I do respect the history of KC greatly, but the stadium is not the approach I would take. And I truly think this forum is out of touch on some historical places/buildings compared to the community. That is KCRag I suppose.
TLDR- KCRag members care a lot more about 18th and Vine than the average KC resident does, due to the fact you’re a member of KCRag in the first place. It’s an un-winnable fight to go against the KCRag current on a historical issue like Vine.