OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Construction trailer and 3 excavators are on site. Erosion control installed and clearing had commenced
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7424
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by shinatoo »

Went down to Berkly last Saturday night just to walk around for a bit. I had know idea how active that area had become. I know about BarK but had no idea about all of the other activity, vollyball leagues and soccer games. When this is built out that park is going to packed. Might even change my opnion of developing along the river.
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by TheLastGentleman »

I think the river is more of an attraction than most people on here realize. Is it a dirty river? Perhaps. But its our river.
Riverite
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Riverite »

I love the river.
horizons82
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:41 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by horizons82 »

Riverite wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 10:45 am I love the river.

Same here. I don’t find it all that much worse than other cities’ rivers? Perhaps you could make a case for stretches of Pittsburgh or Chicago being clean, but I’m not so sure.
Riverite
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Riverite »

horizons82 wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 11:25 am
Riverite wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 10:45 am I love the river.

Same here. I don’t find it all that much worse than other cities’ rivers? Perhaps you could make a case for stretches of Pittsburgh or Chicago being clean, but I’m not so sure.
Exactly, not many swim in their rivers, doesn’t mean it can’t be activated. The Elbe for example is not nice around Hamburg, but is utilized well
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2931
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by TheLastGentleman »

horizons82 wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 11:25 amSame here. I don’t find it all that much worse than other cities’ rivers? Perhaps you could make a case for stretches of Pittsburgh or Chicago being clean, but I’m not so sure.
A lot of “dirty” rivers aren’t even that way because of pollution. The Thames in London is infamously gritty, even though it has been cleaned of most pollution. IIRC, it has to do with the way dirt and silt gets stirred up. The Missouri has probably looked the way it does for millennia
Riverite
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Riverite »

Speaking of I know there is a fence on the west side when going down from the river market To Berkeley on the trail. Does anyone know if it is possible to buy that portion of land and extend the trail through the west bottoms possibly with a pedestrian crossing to kaw point?
missingkc
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by missingkc »

Regarding the state of the Missouri millenia ago, when the prairie grasses were in place and the Mo was a meandering (hence, longer) shallower, braided river (see the Platte in NE), it wouldn't have carried the load it does today. Less tllled ground equals less erosion and slower speed (due to meandering, braiding, and increased drag) equals less ability to carry load. Thanks to the Corps, today's Mo is a big drainage ditch carrying the fields to the gulf.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Riverite wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:23 pm Speaking of I know there is a fence on the west side when going down from the river market To Berkeley on the trail. Does anyone know if it is possible to buy that portion of land and extend the trail through the west bottoms possibly with a pedestrian crossing to kaw point?
The land along the river bank is owned by KCMO. Port KC wants to turn it into a trail but I don't think the city has moved any. I am sure youd need to build an under pass at Hannibal similar to the one at the ASB.
Riverite
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Riverite »

normalthings wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 4:09 pm
Riverite wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 12:23 pm Speaking of I know there is a fence on the west side when going down from the river market To Berkeley on the trail. Does anyone know if it is possible to buy that portion of land and extend the trail through the west bottoms possibly with a pedestrian crossing to kaw point?
The land along the river bank is owned by KCMO. Port KC wants to turn it into a trail but I don't think the city has moved any. I am sure youd need to build an under pass at Hannibal similar to the one at the ASB.
Any way to push this, that trail is such a gem, if they could push it further towards west bottoms and find a way to put a removed bike trail connection to cliff drive, then that would easily be the best East to west ride in the city
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

missingkc wrote: Thu Jul 16, 2020 1:14 pm Regarding the state of the Missouri millenia ago, when the prairie grasses were in place and the Mo was a meandering (hence, longer) shallower, braided river (see the Platte in NE), it wouldn't have carried the load it does today. Less tllled ground equals less erosion and slower speed (due to meandering, braiding, and increased drag) equals less ability to carry load. Thanks to the Corps, today's Mo is a big drainage ditch carrying the fields to the gulf.
The river carries a fraction of the sediments that it used to. During Lewis & Clark's expedition the river was closer to a flowing mud than free flowing water. In the early 1900's about 300 million metric tons of sediment now just 55 million tons. In regards to chemical content, the Missouri River is cleaner than Lake of the Ozarks.

https://www.nap.edu/read/13019/chapter/4#21
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by rxlexi »

Any way to push this, that trail is such a gem, if they could push it further towards west bottoms and find a way to put a removed bike trail connection to cliff drive, then that would easily be the best East to west ride in the city
I agree with what you're saying and a levee trail to KCK is a no-brainer (can't believe this hasn't happened yet), but the riverfront trail does connect through the West Bottoms to KCK via surface streets and then separated bike path beneath the Lewis & Clark Viaduct. Totally not ideal, I know, but the idea is there and at least the streets are mostly low traffic. There is also a separate bike/ped path that connects the east end of Columbus Park to Cliff Drive. It's admittedly pretty well hidden on the Columbus Park side and quite a grade going up to northeast; I've never seen anyone else using it.

The only on-levee paths in the area that I'm aware of are in Lawrence and Riverside (runs behind Argosy Casino all the way to Parkville, a few hundred feet short of English Landing Park, also due to bullshit railroad related issues). Hoping that changes downtown sooner than later, as Kaw Point is a gem.
Riverite
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Riverite »

I’ve used the one in Columbus park, and while it’s a high grade it’s really quite beautiful and totally worth it for anyone that likes cycling.

I was thinking separating a bike path that runs next to Lydia and then heading straight with a little bridge over the railway connecting directly to the trail you are talking about. With signs up along the way. That would make it near five miles of continuous biking almost as long as the trolley track. And if you did along west bottoms it would become the longest urban biking trail in KC
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20062
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by DaveKCMO »

A higher quality crossing -- bike and ped -- at Lydia is so comically overlooked. Add that and finish the bike lane east on 3rd down Industrial Trafficway (there might be space for an uphill striped lane and a sharrow downhill). Problem solved!
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Riverfront was pretty busy again tonight.

Quite a bit of excavation has already taken place for the Northpoint project. Looks like massive drainage tunnels are going in first.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Isle of Capri redevelopment to begin next year.

Northpoint CORE official groundbreaking to take place tomorrow at 11:30am.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20062
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by DaveKCMO »

normalthings wrote: Mon Jul 20, 2020 3:47 pm Isle of Capri redevelopment to begin next year.
Hotel? Parking structure instead of big surface lots? Ditch the fake moat?
Riverite
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1042
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:49 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Riverite »

It would be really nice if they added a hotel or residential on top to give it some height
Post Reply