OFFICIAL - New KCI Terminal

Transportation topics in KC
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33828
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by KCPowercat »

I have no idea.
missingkc
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by missingkc »

Interesting stuff from Wikipedia on TWA's insistence on the unusual terminal design then rapid abandonment of MCI as its primary hub due to the problems caused by the design it had insisted on:
Many design decisions were driven by TWA, which envisioned the facility as its hub, with 747s and Supersonic Transports whisking people from America's heartland to all points on the globe. Streets around the airport included Mexico City Avenue, Brasília Avenue, Paris Street, London Avenue, and Tel Aviv Avenue.

TWA vetoed concepts to model the airport on Washington Dulles International Airport and Tampa International Airport, because those two airports had people movers, which it deemed too expensive. TWA insisted on "Drive to Your Gate" with flight gates 75 feet (23 m) from the roadway (signs along the roadway showed the flights leaving each gate). The single-level terminals had no stairs, similar to a plan that would be built at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport.
TWA's vision

TWA's vision for the future of flight that had been pioneered by the TWA Flight Center at JFK Airport in New York City (which also featured cars close to the gates design) proved troublesome almost from the start.

The terminals turned out to be unfriendly to the 747 since passengers spilled out of the gate area into the halls. When security checkpoints were added in the 1970s to stem hijackings, they were difficult and expensive to implement since security checkpoints had to be installed at each gate area rather than at a centralized area.

As a result, passenger services were nonexistent downstream of the security checkpoint in the gate area. No restrooms were available, and shops, restaurants, newsstands, ATMs or any other passenger services were not available without exiting the secure area and being re-screened upon re-entry.

Shortly after the airport opened, TWA asked that the terminals be rebuilt to address these issues. Kansas City, citing the massive cost overruns on a newly built airport to TWA specification, refused, prompting TWA to move its hub to Lambert-Saint Louis International Airport in St. Louis, Missouri.[12]
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18141
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by FangKC »

It sounds to me like TWA management at the time simply didn't know what they were doing. The part about the 747 passengers not having enough room in the terminal indicates that.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18141
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by FangKC »

Recycling the rubble.

Airport officials help manage Terminal A construction waste during demolition

https://www.kctv5.com/news/kctv5_news_t ... 5270b.html
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by normalthings »

Just a thought but: What if we sold our airport and used the funds to pay down our debt or build out transit? Most western airports are privatized anyways and the FAA has a program set up for us to do so.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33828
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by KCPowercat »

What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
User avatar
smh
Supporter
Posts: 4303
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 10:40 pm
Location: Central Loop

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by smh »

KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 am What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
That it is a public good. But that's about the extent of my understanding.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by flyingember »

KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 am What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
100% private?

No public meetings
No public finances, investors will demand profits from the airport. No public votes on items that would raise prices
Their choice on what amenities are inside the terminal and where
They own the land, they make deals with airlines to land there
Public services have to be contracted/purchased from the city
Will be more regional. Imagine seeing ads to fly from KC as if it was Fantastic Caverns

For the new terminal
The city would need to approve building a new terminal in terms of the permit approval process. No public selection of the builder. No selection of the time frame. No minority or women owned requirements.

More demands for public incentives to keep service levels up.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by normalthings »

flyingember wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:51 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 am What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
100% private?

No public meetings
No public finances, investors will demand profits from the airport. No public votes on items that would raise prices
Their choice on what amenities are inside the terminal and where
They own the land, they make deals with airlines to land there
Public services have to be contracted/purchased from the city
Will be more regional. Imagine seeing ads to fly from KC as if it was Fantastic Caverns

For the new terminal
The city would need to approve building a new terminal in terms of the permit approval process. No public selection of the builder. No selection of the time frame. No minority or women owned requirements.

More demands for public incentives to keep service levels up.
Many(almost all) of the “cons” above already occur in the current management structure.

Private airports make their money on F&B, Services, and Amenities. That’s why you see soo many restaurants and shops when traveling Europe.

In regards to the new terminal, the city permitting department goes through the permit process with any project including the New Terminal. Let’s not forget that without the city referendum process, CFRG, and general slow gov. action, we would about to be opening the new terminal.
Last edited by normalthings on Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:42 pm, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33828
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by KCPowercat »

smh wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:38 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 am What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
That it is a public good. But that's about the extent of my understanding.
An airport seems lesser extent than other infrastructure. Seems to be operated almost privately now.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by normalthings »

KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:20 pm
smh wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:38 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 am What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
That it is a public good. But that's about the extent of my understanding.
An airport seems lesser extent than other infrastructure. Seems to be operated almost privately now.
A pivate company manages all parking, another manages all of the F&B. Airlines hold the Aviation Department’s purse strings. The rest of the aviation department is run like a business but with the requirements of a city department.

My greatest fear would be preferential treatment given to 1 big carrier. However, that’s pretty much how it works now with Southwest. Other western private airports generally manage to a-lot gates in a fair manner.
Last edited by normalthings on Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:41 pm, edited 3 times in total.
WoodDraw
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3348
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by WoodDraw »

normalthings wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:28 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:20 pm
smh wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:38 pm

That it is a public good. But that's about the extent of my understanding.
An airport seems lesser extent than other infrastructure. Seems to be operated almost privately now.
My greatest fear would be preferential treatment given to 1 big carrier. However, that’s pretty much how it works now. Other western private airports generally manager to a lot Gates in a fair manner.
Dumb question, but when you say western are you referring to the western us or the western world?

I know nothing about this and have to figure out what dumb question to ask next to understand this.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by normalthings »

WoodDraw wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:31 pm
normalthings wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:28 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:20 pm

An airport seems lesser extent than other infrastructure. Seems to be operated almost privately now.
My greatest fear would be preferential treatment given to 1 big carrier. However, that’s pretty much how it works now. Other western private airports generally manager to a lot Gates in a fair manner.
Dumb question, but when you say western are you referring to the western us or the western world?

I know nothing about this and have to figure out what dumb question to ask next to understand this.
Western World: In Europe, 40% of Commercial Airports or 80% of passengers , Australia(Oceania), some Asia (iirc) etc.

Private Commercial Airports in the US is a “very Missouri” thing. The only private commercial airport in the US is Branson. STL is moving in that direction as well. STL’s wanting to sell theirs to help cover their liabilities.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by flyingember »

normalthings wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:17 pm
flyingember wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:51 pm
KCPowercat wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 11:06 am What are the common arguments against a private airport? I'm up for exploring it.
100% private?

No public meetings
No public finances, investors will demand profits from the airport. No public votes on items that would raise prices
Their choice on what amenities are inside the terminal and where
They own the land, they make deals with airlines to land there
Public services have to be contracted/purchased from the city
Will be more regional. Imagine seeing ads to fly from KC as if it was Fantastic Caverns

For the new terminal
The city would need to approve building a new terminal in terms of the permit approval process. No public selection of the builder. No selection of the time frame. No minority or women owned requirements.

More demands for public incentives to keep service levels up.
Many(almost all) of the “cons” above already occur in the current management structure.

Private airports make their money on F&B, Services, and Amenities. That’s why you see soo many restaurants and shops when traveling Europe.

In regards to the new terminal, the city permitting department goes through the permit process with any project including the New Terminal. Let’s not forget that without the city referendum process, CFRG, and general slow gov. action, we would about to be opening the new terminal.
And the fact that you know about the negatives is because it's not private.

You can't say that the process being visible was the cause of the delay. Look at how long the totally secret convention hotel process took.
User avatar
Eon Blue
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1124
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:28 pm
Location: Downtown KCMO

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by Eon Blue »

Isn’t St. Louis pursuing airport privatization?
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7188
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by beautyfromashes »

What is the average costs of our city debt? If it’s cheap money, why pay it off?
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18141
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by FangKC »

Eon Blue wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 6:12 pm Isn’t St. Louis pursuing airport privatization?
It's more like Rex Sinquefield is pursing airport privatization.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by normalthings »

beautyfromashes wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 7:03 pm What is the average costs of our city debt? If it’s cheap money, why pay it off?
We have a debt/liability load that is much higher than comparable cities(probably linked to low density. I just threw debt payments out as an option.

My top preferred destinations for the funds would be:
1. Public Transit Cap Ex
2. Education Cap Ex potentially including UMKC
3. Complete Street Infrastructure
User avatar
mykem
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1194
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:23 am

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by mykem »

Better mass transit, streets with curbs and storm drains along with more sidewalks, and bike lanes.
User avatar
warwickland
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4834
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:29 pm
Location: St. Louis County, MO

Re: We are getting a new airport!!!

Post by warwickland »

FangKC wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 10:58 pm
Eon Blue wrote: Tue Aug 13, 2019 6:12 pm Isn’t St. Louis pursuing airport privatization?
It's more like Rex Sinquefield is pursing airport privatization.
this...and rex sinquefields "projects" are falling apart.
Post Reply