We should let them build over the highway.DaveKCMO wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 8:49 pmAre they really in a position to help fund that project? A request for full city or state funding would fall on deaf ears.Critical_Mass wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2019 5:38 pm Fingers crossed the delay is partly due to waiting on an I-670 lid announcement they're partially involved in, since that would directly impact the design (allow for south facing balconies on the lower levels)
Two Light - 14th & Grand
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34618
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Is anybody not allowing them to do it?
- grovester
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 4626
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: KC Metro
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
I believe that is a modot thing.
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3433
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Maybe Cerner could finally contribute to the urban core and sponsor the park. Enough of their employees live right around there.
I think it's reasonable to expect property owners along there to contribute, but with city and state funding this shouldn't be hard to do.
Having a central park would be amazing.
I think it's reasonable to expect property owners along there to contribute, but with city and state funding this shouldn't be hard to do.
Having a central park would be amazing.
- rxlexi
- Penntower
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
- Location: Briarcliff
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
I'm absolutely all for an I-670 deck park a la Dallas. I think the space would be incredible, and likely very well used.Having a central park would be amazing.
However, if given the choice, I'd rather invest ~$100m in a rebuild of Penn Valley Park, our already extant downtown central park, complete with skyline views, wooded bluffs and landmark structures, that is essentially unused (not without reason).
To me the impact would be much larger; the I-670 trench is becoming a relative non-factor is the surrounding blocks are built up. I do realize this is purely hypothetical, and PVP will likely remain a freeway on-ramp for the foreseeable future.
-
- Strip mall
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:53 am
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
There is a big disconnect between Power and Light/CBD and the Crossroads. A new park would connect the areas and create much synergie and pedestrian life downtown. It would also spur a ton of development along the south side, which still contains a ton of surface parking.rxlexi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:27 am
I'm absolutely all for an I-670 deck park a la Dallas. I think the space would be incredible, and likely very well used.
However, if given the choice, I'd rather invest ~$100m in a rebuild of Penn Valley Park, our already extant downtown central park, complete with skyline views, wooded bluffs and landmark structures, that is essentially unused (not without reason).
To me the impact would be much larger; the I-670 trench is becoming a relative non-factor is the surrounding blocks are built up. I do realize this is purely hypothetical, and PVP will likely remain a freeway on-ramp for the foreseeable future.
Penn Valley Park needs (a lot of) work that should be addressed after the streetcar extension gets underway. They are both important but I think priority wise, capping the loop should be a P0 and PVP a P1.
- FangKC
- City Hall
- Posts: 18839
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
I agree the deck is necessary. However, I don't foresee the federal or state governments allocating any money for it right now. The state can't even find enough money for the new Buck O'Neil bridge.
Missouri also will have to pay to completely rebuild sections of I-29, State highways, and bridges, in NW Missouri that were damaged or destroyed by flooding. Money that wasn't previously in the budget cue, or backlog.
If the deck gets built anytime soon, it's probably going to be a combination of City, County, and private dollars.
Any changes to the park will face possible opposition from the Penn Valley Park Conservancy. The group doesn't exist to draw more visitors to the park, but to conserve the park exactly as designed by George Kessler.
Missouri also will have to pay to completely rebuild sections of I-29, State highways, and bridges, in NW Missouri that were damaged or destroyed by flooding. Money that wasn't previously in the budget cue, or backlog.
If the deck gets built anytime soon, it's probably going to be a combination of City, County, and private dollars.
Any changes to the park will face possible opposition from the Penn Valley Park Conservancy. The group doesn't exist to draw more visitors to the park, but to conserve the park exactly as designed by George Kessler.
- grovester
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 4626
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: KC Metro
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
No public funds!
- TheLastGentleman
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
That Kessler fellow sure was ahead of his time with all the freeway infrastructure.
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20129
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34618
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
It sure would help.
-
- Strip mall
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 11:53 am
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Highways are a physical barrier that have been used to divide neighborhoods for decades. Capping the highway and creating a park or development is vital to restoring a connection between Crossroads and P&L.
https://www.citylab.com/transportation/ ... st/584707/
Suggested reading^
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20129
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Oh, I've done the reading and don't oppose capping or removal. In the scope of downtown highway scars, it's the least offensive and could be improved by simply adding more sound abatement and plantings in the adjacent green spaces. The Baltimore crossing just needs to be narrowed.
North Loop removal, taking MO-9 to grade, US-71 underpass treatments, and relocating I-35 to the bluff are my downtown highway abatement priorities.
We can't do it all, so we have to prioritize (and, frankly, I'm not optimistic the private sector will come through on the lid like the people on this forum think they will).
North Loop removal, taking MO-9 to grade, US-71 underpass treatments, and relocating I-35 to the bluff are my downtown highway abatement priorities.
We can't do it all, so we have to prioritize (and, frankly, I'm not optimistic the private sector will come through on the lid like the people on this forum think they will).
- alejandro46
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1378
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:24 pm
- Location: King in the North(Land)
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Agreed, KC needs to prioritize N. loop removal ideally in conjunction with Buck O'Neil bridge replacement project. There is an urgent need and ticking clock to replace the bridge, where apart from sucky views and annoyance time is not of the essence in the 670-caping project. Both are incredibly worthy but expensive and regulatory difficult projects.DaveKCMO wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:42 pm Oh, I've done the reading and don't oppose capping or removal. In the scope of downtown highway scars, it's the least offensive and could be improved by simply adding more sound abatement and plantings in the adjacent green spaces. The Baltimore crossing just needs to be narrowed.
North Loop removal, taking MO-9 to grade, US-71 underpass treatments, and relocating I-35 to the bluff are my downtown highway abatement priorities.
We can't do it all, so we have to prioritize (and, frankly, I'm not optimistic the private sector will come through on the lid like the people on this forum think they will).
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3433
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
my worry with removing the north loop is that it turns into parking.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34618
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Good point. I was evaluating this in a bit of a silo of cordish fronting the moneyDaveKCMO wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:42 pm Oh, I've done the reading and don't oppose capping or removal. In the scope of downtown highway scars, it's the least offensive and could be improved by simply adding more sound abatement and plantings in the adjacent green spaces. The Baltimore crossing just needs to be narrowed.
North Loop removal, taking MO-9 to grade, US-71 underpass treatments, and relocating I-35 to the bluff are my downtown highway abatement priorities.
We can't do it all, so we have to prioritize (and, frankly, I'm not optimistic the private sector will come through on the lid like the people on this forum think they will).
- DColeKC
- Ambassador
- Posts: 4324
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2019 10:50 am
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
You'll start to see some work being down on Truman, in between Grand and Walnut. The grassy area will become a dog run/park for Two Light residents.
- wahoowa
- Ambassador
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Sat May 02, 2015 2:57 pm
- Location: CBD
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
restricted to just 2 light residents? i see people bring dogs from south of truman up to that strip all the time.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 7:16 pm
- Location: Charlotte, NC
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Right. Isn't that public property? How can it be reserved for residents of one building?
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34618
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Two Light - 14th & Grand
Power and light apartments did the same but it's on private land.
MoDot let river market do this but is public.
MoDot let river market do this but is public.