Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
- alejandro46
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:24 pm
- Location: King in the North(Land)
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
The Next Rail study provides the exact type of systemwide rail planning and alignment review that is needed. Decision makers already have a good idea of which areas are most suited for Streetcar and transit-oriented development. Armour is awesome, but no streetcar was needed for the development to take place. 31st/Linwood and Indep. avenue have much greater potential for development in the future vs. development that already occurred.
http://kcstreetcar.org/wp-content/uploa ... erview.pdf
http://kcstreetcar.org/wp-content/uploa ... erview.pdf
- beautyfromashes
- One Park Place
- Posts: 7299
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
So, you said no one is planning for this, but said the city has picked Linwood as the E/W route, but we chose to move the Linwood Main St stop to 31st and dump E/W cars into the middle of N/S streetcar traffic on Main?DaveKCMO wrote:Actually, the city can do all of the planning they want after Q1 was modified by Council vote...beautyfromashes wrote:And I guess no time or money can been spent on planning on a larger rail network due to the stupid Dejanes initiative vote.DaveKCMO wrote: Since no one is planning for this, it hasn't been decided.
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20074
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
The city approved an expansion plan based on NextRail... four years ago. It was Main Street to 51st, Linwood to Prospect, and Independence to Prospect.beautyfromashes wrote:So, you said no one is planning for this, but said the city has picked Linwood as the E/W route, but we chose to move the Linwood Main St stop to 31st and dump E/W cars into the middle of N/S streetcar traffic on Main?DaveKCMO wrote:Actually, the city can do all of the planning they want after Q1 was modified by Council vote...beautyfromashes wrote: And I guess no time or money can been spent on planning on a larger rail network due to the stupid Dejanes initiative vote.
Since then their larger TDD plan failed at the ballot box, one route was plucked from the ashes and a smaller TDD passed by the people, Q1 was narrowly approved then modified, and no one is doing systemwide planning for streetcar beyond the Main Street and Riverfront extensions at this time.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I still think that the price of a line to Brookside was way over exaggerated. I should have a basic report done sometime this summer about this.
-
- Pad site
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:43 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I agree this was a missed opportunity not extending to Brookside or Waldo as part of Phase II.normalthings wrote:I still think that the price of a line to Brookside was way over exaggerated. I should have a basic report done sometime this summer about this.
I suspect the political will was not there to fight the NIMBYs, even if they were a small (but vocal) minority.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
Good info on growth areas.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/07/ ... wn/566078/
The 22-35 age group has mostly been moving into the near suburbs 3-10 miles from downtown as the 0-3 mile range.
The most interesting is the 10+ mile range grwoth is now static.
10 miles is
Claycomo
About Barry and N. Oak
Parkville the close side of Riss Lake
KCK through about 80th
75th and I-35
Bannister Rd and Troost
The close side of Raytown
Downtown Independence
This backs up existing knowledge and quantify shorter 5 mile lines distance commuter lines. A streetcar system that reaches 5 miles in 5 directions would serve the most popular growth areas and encourage moving into existing suburbs instead of greenfield development.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/07/ ... wn/566078/
The 22-35 age group has mostly been moving into the near suburbs 3-10 miles from downtown as the 0-3 mile range.
The most interesting is the 10+ mile range grwoth is now static.
10 miles is
Claycomo
About Barry and N. Oak
Parkville the close side of Riss Lake
KCK through about 80th
75th and I-35
Bannister Rd and Troost
The close side of Raytown
Downtown Independence
This backs up existing knowledge and quantify shorter 5 mile lines distance commuter lines. A streetcar system that reaches 5 miles in 5 directions would serve the most popular growth areas and encourage moving into existing suburbs instead of greenfield development.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
There was a group at Union Station today with what looked like schematic type drawings of a jackson county rail system. They said something about having a campaign office open up soon, going on city visits, and some other things. Talked a bit about the Rock Island Corridor,etx
They were pretty obviously not associated with any of the usual suspects (Dave,Clay, etc).
Does anyone know more about this?
They were pretty obviously not associated with any of the usual suspects (Dave,Clay, etc).
Does anyone know more about this?
- Chris Stritzel
- Penntower
- Posts: 2444
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I wouldn't be surprised if some sort of light rail system would be proposed again. They may want to start a campaign to have voters decide on construction a wide range system.normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:41 pm There was a group at Union Station today with what looked like schematic type drawings of a jackson county rail system. They said something about having a campaign office open up soon, going on city visits, and some other things. Talked a bit about the Rock Island Corridor,etx
They were pretty obviously not associated with any of the usual suspects (Dave,Clay, etc).
Does anyone know more about this?
- DaveKCMO
- Ambassador
- Posts: 20074
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
- Location: Crossroads
- Contact:
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
News to me. Not to humblebrag, but I think I'd know about something legit. Jackson County has pretty much lost interest in all things transit since Sanders left, and the railroads scuttled his plan (and I doubt the prices or attitudes have changed).normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:41 pm There was a group at Union Station today with what looked like schematic type drawings of a jackson county rail system. They said something about having a campaign office open up soon, going on city visits, and some other things. Talked a bit about the Rock Island Corridor,etx
They were pretty obviously not associated with any of the usual suspects (Dave,Clay, etc).
Does anyone know more about this?
There is a rogue group -- Citizens for Progress? -- that always shows up at KCATA board meetings to lobby for "cheap" elevated rail or a fantasy subway plan that's been cooked up for awhile. They don't have any backers or political support, as far as I know.
Also, there's no office space available at Union Station and we all know the billion dollar price tag of modifying the trench for more trains there...
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I would expect you to know of any legitimate plans. If the group is ever out and about again I’ll try to get more information from them. They mentioned their office was going to be in Raytown if that helps. It very well could be that Citizens for Progress group you mentioned.DaveKCMO wrote: ↑Fri Sep 28, 2018 4:02 pmNews to me. Not to humblebrag, but I think I'd know about something legit. Jackson County has pretty much lost interest in all things transit since Sanders left, and the railroads scuttled his plan (and I doubt the prices or attitudes have changed).normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Sep 27, 2018 7:41 pm There was a group at Union Station today with what looked like schematic type drawings of a jackson county rail system. They said something about having a campaign office open up soon, going on city visits, and some other things. Talked a bit about the Rock Island Corridor,etx
They were pretty obviously not associated with any of the usual suspects (Dave,Clay, etc).
Does anyone know more about this?
There is a rogue group -- Citizens for Progress? -- that always shows up at KCATA board meetings to lobby for "cheap" elevated rail or a fantasy subway plan that's been cooked up for awhile. They don't have any backers or political support, as far as I know.
Also, there's no office space available at Union Station and we all know the billion dollar price tag of modifying the trench for more trains there...
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
Two of those corridors weren't part of the 2014 study (39th to KU Med and into downtown KCK). So this is a sign the project is moving away from downtown and east side projects and into being more of a regional commuter system with a focus on high value targets that can pay the property taxes needed for a local match.
If we could build all these corridors, DMU commuter rail into downtown becomes feasible. This list would create an ~5 mile from downtown employment core in a circle from downtown KCK to NKC to the east side to the plaza to KU Med where bus lines can intersect at the closest line.
If we could build all these corridors, DMU commuter rail into downtown becomes feasible. This list would create an ~5 mile from downtown employment core in a circle from downtown KCK to NKC to the east side to the plaza to KU Med where bus lines can intersect at the closest line.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
Looking at the list of possible routes, would suggest Independence Ave. or North KC over HOA Bridge for Phase 3.
Indie Ave already most dense population in metro and already has a fairly significant commercial stretch, which should attract investment and improve over the future. It's not just about getting people into jobs and building up TOD but also getting outsiders to visit the new stretches, increasing tax revenue for the area. Indie Ave and North KC (especially downtown) have enough substantial commercial vitality to more quickly build up into TOD stretches outsiders might eventually visit. 18th St to SW Blvd too but would rather see another new line extended further out of downtown. But an 18th St/SW Blvd free circulator bus would be nice. KCK could work if going through W Bottoms but otherwise too much of a gap. 39th St. is a natural for another MAX line. Don't use streetcar technology for I70 corridor - pursue commuter rail instead or those new electric trams hitting Asia.
Are they planning Phase 3 to also be free to ride?
Indie Ave already most dense population in metro and already has a fairly significant commercial stretch, which should attract investment and improve over the future. It's not just about getting people into jobs and building up TOD but also getting outsiders to visit the new stretches, increasing tax revenue for the area. Indie Ave and North KC (especially downtown) have enough substantial commercial vitality to more quickly build up into TOD stretches outsiders might eventually visit. 18th St to SW Blvd too but would rather see another new line extended further out of downtown. But an 18th St/SW Blvd free circulator bus would be nice. KCK could work if going through W Bottoms but otherwise too much of a gap. 39th St. is a natural for another MAX line. Don't use streetcar technology for I70 corridor - pursue commuter rail instead or those new electric trams hitting Asia.
Are they planning Phase 3 to also be free to ride?
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I would like to see us move towards both for 2028-2030 construction start. However, it looks like we are going to do MAX in these routes instead.
What’s hampering us is large contingency requirements which lead to the $100M+ per mile that is budgeted for the UMKC extension. That’s just too much for many more TDDs to support. We need to figure out a way to do this cheaper (I think it’s possible) and we need regional funding (cough sell KCI cough).
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
New electric trams on wheels that look just like streetcar may cut costs but may not attract TOD (transit-oriented development). Fixed rail should be used for lines that we'd most want to see TOD, areas that have potential to attract outsiders to that new stretch. TOD developers like fixed rail over non-rail as the later line could change in future.
Pursue MAX and these electric trams for moving people into jobs or for district circulators or well established destinations, not for stretches intended to create new destination TOD...
Pursue MAX and these electric trams for moving people into jobs or for district circulators or well established destinations, not for stretches intended to create new destination TOD...
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I-70 replaced the original elevated streetcar route. I like the idea of following actual businesses at street level but an express route between downtowns would be hugely beneficial for KCK and help sell their involvement. Terminate so it hits their downtown transit center at the very least.
It also is good PR for trains. That person stuck in traffic on the viaduct will be able to see the train pass them by at full speed.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
There are different schools of thought on appropriate forms of transit and the line it runs along. The streetcar technology we use could work as a commuter line to KCK as you described but my position (for KC) is that it's better to use streetcar to attract new destination TOD, not as commuter service. Commuter rail, MAX (if true BRT) and the electric tram along dedicated lane might work better for KCK stretch though streetcar could work if going through West Bottoms, creating new street level TOD along the way.
-
- Strip mall
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:36 pm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
Developers don't care about what might happen to transit in the future. They barely care about it in the present. They'll build dense housing anywhere it's allowed by zoning where the property values support it. Transit should be built for its transit value. Building it to spur construction is a huge scam in the vast majority of cases.earthling wrote: ↑Fri Aug 16, 2019 11:30 am New electric trams on wheels that look just like streetcar may cut costs but may not attract TOD (transit-oriented development). Fixed rail should be used for lines that we'd most want to see TOD, areas that have potential to attract outsiders to that new stretch. TOD developers like fixed rail over non-rail as the later line could change in future.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
There are TOD specific developers out there who specifically seek out rail lines because they don't change compared to say bus lines that might. The developer from Denver who bought much of Delaware St specifically calls himself a TOD developer and he is on this site. I'm talking TOD developers, not developers in general.
edit: I do agree that transit overall should be built for transit value but different technologies of transit should target particular uses and streetcar is a good form to target TOD developers. That is, the only difference between MAX and streetcar in function is that streetcar's rail aspect will target TOD developers, most BRT won't, especially KC's not very fixed version of BRT.
edit: I do agree that transit overall should be built for transit value but different technologies of transit should target particular uses and streetcar is a good form to target TOD developers. That is, the only difference between MAX and streetcar in function is that streetcar's rail aspect will target TOD developers, most BRT won't, especially KC's not very fixed version of BRT.
Last edited by earthling on Fri Aug 16, 2019 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- FangKC
- City Hall
- Posts: 18375
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
- Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound
Re: Phase Three Streetcar Expansion
I don't see the Northeast residents ever voting to set up the tax district for the Independence Avenue expansion. I have yet to encounter anyone who supports a streetcar in this neighborhood. You might be able to extend one to around Independence Avenue and Woodland if you could get some pro-streetcar developer to buy up all the land along the route, and be willing to tax itself for the project. Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences would probably support it.
I have never seen traffic backed up on the Intercity Viaduct (I-70). It's usually only when you reach the North Loop trench that the traffic slows.
I have never seen traffic backed up on the Intercity Viaduct (I-70). It's usually only when you reach the North Loop trench that the traffic slows.