Politics
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24056
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: 2012 Election
Kinda interesting polling in Kansas.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main ... llany.html
-Hillary does better than most Dems have historically done in KS as a potential Pres candidate, but still falls well short to candidates like Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan
-Bob Dole is very popular. No one knows who Pat Roberts or Jerry Moran are (both are the current US Senators)
-Sam Brownback is very unpopular but would still win handily against any Dem
-Gay marriage not surprisingly is not approved by Kansans, but its not as bad as you would think (39-51). And 63% of Kansans support civil unions for gays. IN KANSAS. Let's get this legal people.
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main ... llany.html
-Hillary does better than most Dems have historically done in KS as a potential Pres candidate, but still falls well short to candidates like Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan
-Bob Dole is very popular. No one knows who Pat Roberts or Jerry Moran are (both are the current US Senators)
-Sam Brownback is very unpopular but would still win handily against any Dem
-Gay marriage not surprisingly is not approved by Kansans, but its not as bad as you would think (39-51). And 63% of Kansans support civil unions for gays. IN KANSAS. Let's get this legal people.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24056
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: 2012 Election
Thought this was kind of interesting. Political scientists find that state legislators think their constituents are more conservative than they actually are.
Broockman and Skovron find that legislators consistently believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are. This includes Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives. But conservative legislators generally overestimate the conservatism of their constituents by 20 points. “This difference is so large that nearly half of conservative politicians appear to believe that they represent a district that is more conservative on these issues than is the most conservative district in the entire country,”
-
- Ambassador
- Posts: 7586
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Re: 2012 Election
You know why there aren't moderate politicians? Because they have no answers for the reasonable people, so they have to play to the extremism.
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: 2012 Election
There's also less chance of the extremists voting for the other candidate. The closer to the center you get, the more likely a voter is to drift over to the other guy.shinatoo wrote:You know why there aren't moderate politicians? Because they have no answers for the reasonable people, so they have to play to the extremism.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24056
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: 2012 Election
GOP proposes to strip ACORN of federal funding, even though it already stripped all federal funding of ACORN already. And the fact that ACORN no longer exists.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/0 ... lp00000003
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/0 ... lp00000003
-
- Broadway Square
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:33 pm
Re: 2012 Election
There are plenty of moderate politicians, there just aren't any moderate Republicans.
-
- City Center Square
- Posts: 12719
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm
Re: 2012 Election
How do you define "moderate"? One could say there aren't any moderate Democrats just as easy. Maybe your moderate Dems are in reality DINO's or Democrats in name only.
Last edited by aknowledgeableperson on Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: 2012 Election
aknowledgeableperson wrote:How do you define "moderate"? One could say there aren't any moderate Democrats just as easy. Maybe your moderate Dems are in reality DIMO's or Democrats in name only.
-
- City Center Square
- Posts: 12719
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm
Re: 2012 Election
Given the amount of time after the 2012 election and the goings-on now maybe a new topic, "2014 Election" is needed.
Anyway, given how the stock markets are acting maybe the sequestration is a good thing. The Dems get their Defense cuts and the GOP gets its Budget cuts.
Anyway, given how the stock markets are acting maybe the sequestration is a good thing. The Dems get their Defense cuts and the GOP gets its Budget cuts.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24056
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: 2012 Election
I just split it and made it a generic "politics" thread.aknowledgeableperson wrote:Given the amount of time after the 2012 election and the goings-on now maybe a new topic, "2014 Election" is needed.
Anyway, given how the stock markets are acting maybe the sequestration is a good thing. The Dems get their Defense cuts and the GOP gets its Budget cuts.
My sis works at Homeland Security and has been given notice they will be furloughed for most of April. So its not good for everyone.
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: 2012 Election
The stock market is a gauge of what the stock market likes. That's all.aknowledgeableperson wrote:Given the amount of time after the 2012 election and the goings-on now maybe a new topic, "2014 Election" is needed.
Anyway, given how the stock markets are acting maybe the sequestration is a good thing. The Dems get their Defense cuts and the GOP gets its Budget cuts.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: 2012 Election
This could be bad for KC given the Feds are the largest employer here. Many think the sequester issue is a manufactured crisis like the fiscal cliff thing but the sequester could directly impact KC and pretty hard. If even for just a short time, I wonder if it could hurt momentum on things like GSA move into downtown.KCMax wrote:aknowledgeableperson wrote: My sis works at Homeland Security and has been given notice they will be furloughed for most of April. So its not good for everyone.
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: Politics
I don't think there's any question that it's a manufactured crisis. Like the fiscal cliff. Like the debt ceiling.
-
- Broadway Square
- Posts: 2908
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:33 pm
Re: 2012 Election
I don't really get what you're trying to argue here. If their political position is moderate and their party affiliation is Democrat, they are moderate Democrats. I honestly can't parse out what the "DINO" comment is supposed to be getting at. Are you trying to argue that in fact moderation is a trait of the GOP, and that any "moderate" Dems actually belong in the Republican party? Or are you complaining that "moderate" Dems only appear so insofar as they're too far right to fit with the supposedly left-wing Democratic party, and their having abandoned leftism while retaining the Dem affiliation makes them appear "moderate" when in fact they're outright conservative? Or maybe the opposite, that the Dem party should be centrist but many Dems are too far to the left and are no longer really Dems?aknowledgeableperson wrote:How do you define "moderate"? One could say there aren't any moderate Democrats just as easy. Maybe your moderate Dems are in reality DINO's or Democrats in name only.
I would define "moderate" as being willing to make compromises and incorporate some of the other side's ideas to reach an agreement; according to that definition, there are precious few remaining moderate Republicans. On the other hand, if anything, I would say the problem with the Dems is that they're too moderate -- they don't just incorporate some of the GOP's ideas, they basically pass GOP legislation (eg ACA), which the GOP nonetheless rejects just...because. The Republican slogan at this point should be "give us an inch and we'll take a mile." Effective governance requires politicians to meet in the middle on most issues, but that doesn't mean the politicians themselves must always be centrist -- the GOP is dragging our political conversation much too far rightward and there aren't enough genuinely left wing Dems to keep the "middle" anchored in a reasonable place. Couple this with the fact that people tend to assume that when there are two sides to an argument, both are equally meritorious -- when the far right GOP clashes with the center-right Obama, it simply must be the case that both sides have staked out positions on opposite extremes, right? -- and we end up deciding there are no moderate politicians left.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8519
- Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
- Location: milky way, orion arm
Re: Politics
However it could impact KC negatively even if it is.chaglang wrote:I don't think there's any question that it's a manufactured crisis. Like the fiscal cliff. Like the debt ceiling.
- grovester
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: KC Metro
Re: Politics
Not sure what you all are implying by it being "manufactured". It's real and will have consequences that will become more serious over time. The hope is that it will get resolved in the coming CR, but it's not a given.
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: Politics
It was in reference to the construction of apocalyptic penalties around things that have never been treated like that before. Everything is now a pretext to shut down the government.grovester wrote:Not sure what you all are implying by it being "manufactured". It's real and will have consequences that will become more serious over time. The hope is that it will get resolved in the coming CR, but it's not a given.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24056
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Politics
I thought the "manufactured" reference always meant it was a crisis entirely created by Congress and the President.chaglang wrote:It was in reference to the construction of apocalyptic penalties around things that have never been treated like that before. Everything is now a pretext to shut down the government.grovester wrote:Not sure what you all are implying by it being "manufactured". It's real and will have consequences that will become more serious over time. The hope is that it will get resolved in the coming CR, but it's not a given.
- grovester
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: KC Metro
Re: Politics
Well, it was created by the both of them, but not without necessity. It was the result of the first debt limit stand off. It was supposed to be so draconian and idiotic that it would never come to fruition. Needless to say, everyone underestimated the lack of moderation in congress.
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: Politics
And the first debt limit standoff was a manufactured crisis. That had been a simple procedural vote for years.