Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: West Plaza
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Did they wave e-tax? Thats where KC always wins when relocating biz's w/n metro. Even if people don't move we still grab a chunk of their income
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1424
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 10:39 am
- Location: River Market and Rosedale
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
I don't think it said anything about the e tax, so I assume it was not waived.
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: West Plaza
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
thats what i was thinking. I agree w/ you heather-was mostly responding to brew.
KC "wins" on e-tax alone I'd think. overall we all lose of course.
KC "wins" on e-tax alone I'd think. overall we all lose of course.
-
- Alameda Tower
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:51 pm
- Location: Martin City
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
It is $64 million in incentive to move 1,225 jobs a few miles.
That is $52 K per job.
Not as outragous as the AMC and Teva deals. (Teva was $132 K per job, AMC was similar)
But still a waste. I put the blame squarely on Kansas. they are the ones that escalated this war to its current pathetically stupid levels.
That is $52 K per job.
Not as outragous as the AMC and Teva deals. (Teva was $132 K per job, AMC was similar)
But still a waste. I put the blame squarely on Kansas. they are the ones that escalated this war to its current pathetically stupid levels.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34108
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
MO gets 3x the jobs vs. The Amc deal for the same incentive amount.... Does that make it a win? Lol
-
- City Center Square
- Posts: 12661
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Just curious what about average income per job?
The article states $11.1M from new tax revenues so I would assume that includes the E-tax.Did they wave e-tax?
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: West Plaza
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
It doesn't. In talking with someone from EDC one of their main points on how this is a "win" for the city was b/c of offsets from the e-tax.aknowledgeableperson wrote: The article states $11.1M from new tax revenues so I would assume that includes the E-tax.
from the bizjournal
I don't think e-tax is "economic activity". I think they're referring to sales taxes the biz does.On Thursday, the Kansas City Council approved tax increment financing for Freightquote’s forthcoming 200,000-square-foot office building near Interstate 435 and State Line Road. The TIF would redirect economic activity taxes to reimburse the developer for certain costs that benefit the public.
-
- Parking Garage
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:23 am
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
The 26 million in credits can only be taken if Freightquote meets the strict payroll qualifications. So depending on how jobs works out, it could pan out to be in our favor. In addition, that area actually has quite a bit of offerings (foodwise) to the north of 435 and towards Ward Parkway which isn't that far away. I think its a good win and great visibility for the corporate headquarters in that area. Also, the way I read this was they are moving/consolidating their corporate headquarters which means we are gaining the jobs from their other regional locations and not just from the Kansas complex. I might be mistaken though.
- Highlander
- City Center Square
- Posts: 10233
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
- Location: Houston
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Mixed emotions here. It's really rather sick that any company looking for freebies can now parlay their location into offers of corporate welfare from the fawning governments on both sides of the state line.
My concern is whether this latest announcement will accelerate the incentives war or will Kansas finally offer a truce? With Kansas bleeding as fast as KCMO now, both sides have got to realize it's a zero sum game being played out by fools.
My concern is whether this latest announcement will accelerate the incentives war or will Kansas finally offer a truce? With Kansas bleeding as fast as KCMO now, both sides have got to realize it's a zero sum game being played out by fools.
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 11240
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:00 am
- Location: Historic Northeast
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Being able to say, "As [elected official], I brought thousands of new jobs into [state]," is a powerful thing.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Collison: Incentive battle hurts area growth
Steve Rose: Why the border war will go onGreg LeRoy, executive director of Good Jobs First, a national organization that tracks how states use or misuse incentives, observed that when it comes to the global economy, it’s about how metros are doing, not Lenexa or Overland Park.
So while officials in Topeka and Jefferson City can keep score moving companies around in metro Kansas City, it doesn’t mean anything to how key business leaders in New York, London and Tokyo think.
“It isn’t letting up, and unfortunately, because it’s a zero sum game, you have governments picking winners and losers, and the rest of us are paying for it,” Hall said.
Some of Hall’s arguments about what is occurring are irrefutable.
Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars are being wasted on incentives for companies that decide to move a few miles across the state line.
Furthermore, Hall is right that there is no net gain for the metropolitan area as a whole in this shuffling.
But there is a net gain to steal from each other, rather than having another town do the stealing. And that is the fallacy in Hall’s analysis.
However, many involved with relocations agree that if we somehow declared a moratorium on incentives, we would lose out to places like Dallas, which will do anything to lure a company to its boundaries.
And that is, in essence, what Hall is calling for, a moratorium. He seeks an agreement between Kansas and Missouri to work together to stop offering these incentives.
That is not realistic. Not only would it open the door to other cities stealing our companies, but it should be noted that Kansas has been a net beneficiary of these tax incentives.
- grovester
- Oak Tower
- Posts: 4585
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
- Location: KC Metro
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
While "some" might leave for other locales, it would reduce the frequency of these things. It is not easy for a JP Morgan to pull up stakes and risk/lose their employees. I would imagine a bi-state org could manage metro area retention in a manner fair to the states and the taxpayers. We need to quit being held hostage by the worst of the offendors. Let them walk.
-
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 3528
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 10:54 am
- Location: UMKC Law
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
How does a bi-state moratorium open the door for other cities to steal our companies? Nobody is saying that KS and MO couldn't use incentives to attract out of state companies or to retain companies being courted by other states. In fact, by pledging to stop poaching eachother's businesses, KS and MO would have more resources to fend off out of state competitors like Dallas or Indy.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34108
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Exactly wildcat. He completely (purposely?) glazes over that point.... Which is the key.
-
- Hotel President
- Posts: 3258
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: West Plaza
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
Not only does he glaze over that point, but he seems to imply that KCMO is angling to have an all out ban on incentives (painting them as naive)...which is of course not at all what KCMO is trying to negotiate. As you two point out, KCMO wants to use incentives to lure new companies to the area/metro (which is what their intended to be used for).
IF he were a good reporter he would point out that each time a metro KS or MO company gets incentives it is a wasted opportunity in luring a new company to the area. This could be seen as a misappropriation or mismanagement of funds by the local gov. Always amazes me how red blooded republicans pick and choose what gov mismanagement of resources they have a problem with. Total waste.
IF he were a good reporter he would point out that each time a metro KS or MO company gets incentives it is a wasted opportunity in luring a new company to the area. This could be seen as a misappropriation or mismanagement of funds by the local gov. Always amazes me how red blooded republicans pick and choose what gov mismanagement of resources they have a problem with. Total waste.
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
American Italian Pasta to closer in KC, consolidate in STL
C'mon Kansas, you didn't even try to poach this one?
C'mon Kansas, you didn't even try to poach this one?
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
- KCMax
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 24051
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
- Contact:
- chaglang
- Bryant Building
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
OH, THE BUILDING. I was checking out that dude's Zeppelin t-shirt and didn't notice that there was a building behind him.
- chrizow
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 17161
- Joined: Fri Aug 08, 2003 8:43 am
Re: Kansas, Missouri battle over companies
chaglang wrote:
OH, THE BUILDING. I was checking out that dude's Zeppelin t-shirt and didn't notice that there was a building behind him.