im2kull wrote:
Yes, and it was sarcastic...
But I still have a little dismay over the "bend" in the arena...I just imagined it bent a little more...the last thing I really want is this soft bubbly world class design to end up a jagged pinnacle of our screwups
I'm sure the latest renderings are accurate.
Pushing the widest point out anything less than 10-15 feet more and we're just fussing over proportions, we're not really making any more of a dramatic statement.
I think the design is fine, especially as far as sports venues goes. It isn't as dramatic as the UFO, but its still nothing like any other sports facility that comes to mind. It does borrow from the Allianz Stadium in Europe, but our arena is all glass where Allianz is an inflatable membrane that you can't see through.
I don't think the design will ever be responsible for the arena becoming some sort of jagged pinnacle of our screw-ups. Design-wise, I think Kemper is pretty nice. Definitely dramatic. Maybe a little weak functionally, but I don't think Kemper had any major shortcomings that couldn't have been dealt with had it been built in a better location. It's actually too bad Kemper wasn't built downtown, closer to Bartle, because they share some design elements.
If the arena becomes a failure, like Kemper, it won't be because of the design.