Any chance on that accelerating the timeline? Or is that more so due to engineering and construction restraints than when funds are dispersed?
OFFICIAL - Main Street Streetcar Extension
- Anthony_Hugo98
- Valencia Place
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2019 10:50 pm
- Location: Overland Park, KS
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Disappointing news. Hopefully, we see that 20% contingency removed shortly and expanded grant programs for future projects. The re-introduction of earmarks may also benefit us.
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
The things that keep me up at night on this project have nothing to do with engineering or construction. They are, in order:
1) Lawsuits (one delayed the starter line for a year)
2) Council approvals (required and always subject to whatever hijinx is happening at a given moment)
The current contingency is 30%. Normal for pre-Trump FTA is 20%.
1) Lawsuits (one delayed the starter line for a year)
2) Council approvals (required and always subject to whatever hijinx is happening at a given moment)
The current contingency is 30%. Normal for pre-Trump FTA is 20%.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
To mention lawsuits, the Trolley Track encroachment lawsuit was on the scale of three years from end to end.
So if someone filed one today let's look at what 5% annual construction inflation over three years does.
$351 million becomes $406 million. That's a > 15% cost increase.
The contingency is completely necessary. With how many projects go dramatically over budget a 30% contingency should become the norm for big projects.
So if someone filed one today let's look at what 5% annual construction inflation over three years does.
$351 million becomes $406 million. That's a > 15% cost increase.
The contingency is completely necessary. With how many projects go dramatically over budget a 30% contingency should become the norm for big projects.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
30% is pretty wild. I maintain the belief that transit projects should not have to do an environmental study and any transit line next to existing or a previous one should get automatic planning/regulatory approval (still needs safety checks)flyingember wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 9:29 am To mention lawsuits, the Trolley Track encroachment lawsuit was on the scale of three years from end to end.
So if someone filed one today let's look at what 5% annual construction inflation over three years does.
$351 million becomes $406 million. That's a > 15% cost increase.
The contingency is completely necessary. With how many projects go dramatically over budget a 30% contingency should become the norm for big projects.
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Especially projects that are being built in existing public right-of-way like a street that already exists.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
That's stupid. None of this is important to do? That for some reason a property miles from any prior studies who cares what's special about it, ignore any and all concerns and just approve building.normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 11:31 am I maintain the belief that transit projects should not have to do an environmental study and any transit line next to existing or a previous one should get automatic planning/regulatory approval (still needs safety checks)
Environmental justice, like making sure low income populations are well served by transit is part of the assessment.
Historic structure assessments, so the project doesn't destroy buildings it shouldn't.
Matching the visual character, like not building a substation that clashes with historic building.
Noise reviews so transit doesn't come in and cause problems with people living in the area
Hazardous material plans so the project can account for if there's storage tanks or dirty soil buried when the street was widened. Think about how many rails were unearthed downtown 60 years after they were buried. Surprises crop up all the time when digging.
Stop placement is even part of the environmental assessment. From the many discussions on the topic this is clearly of huge importance to people.
Imagine if the streetcar came in and destroyed the last historic something along the line or created delays when it dug into someone's basement from 1920.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
flyingember wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 12:52 pmThat's stupid. None of this is important to do? That for some reason a property miles from any prior studies who cares what's special about it, ignore any and all concerns and just approve building.normalthings wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 11:31 am I maintain the belief that transit projects should not have to do an environmental study and any transit line next to existing or a previous one should get automatic planning/regulatory approval (still needs safety checks)
Environmental justice, like making sure low income populations are well served by transit is part of the assessment.
Historic structure assessments, so the project doesn't destroy buildings it shouldn't.
If you are building in an existing street or transit row, its not really a problem.
Matching the visual character, like not building a substation that clashes with historic building.
Dont think that substation design is a piece of the environmental review nor does it take an environmental review to make them look in place
Noise reviews so transit doesn't come in and cause problems with people living in the area
Transit is not very noisy. In fact, the CCROW study showed that the streetcar going behind people's houses would be quieter than the cars in front. Again, not an issue imho if built in existing street or transit row.
Hazardous material plans so the project can account for if there's storage tanks or dirty soil buried when the street was widened. Think about how many rails were unearthed downtown 60 years after they were buried. Surprises crop up all the time when digging.
I agree that a hazardous material plan is important.
Stop placement is even part of the environmental assessment. From the many discussions on the topic this is clearly of huge importance to people.
Is it, I scrolled through and don't see anything. If it is, I am not really sure why that needs to be a piece of an environmental study.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
The streetcar is expanding and rebuilding the row. It's stops are encroaching on the sidewalk. What if it will take away sidewalk seating from businesses, who is this impacting?
Environmental justice, like making sure low income populations are well served by transit is part of the assessment.
Historic structure assessments, so the project doesn't destroy buildings it shouldn't.
If you are building in an existing street or transit row, its not really a problem.
If this impacts a park in a minority area how is the project making up for the loss of park space? This was literally connected to topic of this expansion, how will the streetcar not take away a popular walking trail?
What if the street picked hosts a cultural festival which shuts down the street? A bus can reroute during an event, a streetcar can't. We already have this happen downtown on Grand with the starter line route, problems around closing Grand came up.
It's not just about transit, it's about looking at complete streets and what the streetcar means to it
No, but matching the design to an area absolutely can be important. The blue McDonald's logo in Sedona would be a good example of this. There's a tram somewhere in Europe (Spain?) that has a wire free section because they refused to have the aesthetics of them through a historic area.Matching the visual character, like not building a substation that clashes with historic building.
Dont think that substation design is a piece of the environmental review nor does it take an environmental review to make them look in place
this change impacts the project cost which is important when validating the design for funding
A rail transit horn is 90 decibles. That's like shouting every time you exit a stop. Imagine someone just assuming everyone living nearby knows this.Noise reviews so transit doesn't come in and cause problems with people living in the area
Transit is not very noisy. In fact, the CCROW study showed that the streetcar going behind people's houses would be quieter than the cars in front. Again, not an issue imho if built in existing street or transit row.
page 6
https://kcstreetcar.org/wp-content/uplo ... .16.19.pdf
It's also vibration and there's rules for how much vibration you can have near homes.
You really should read the documents so you understand the reasoning, it's all well documented why noise studies are done.
Hazardous material plans so the project can account for if there's storage tanks or dirty soil buried when the street was widened. Think about how many rails were unearthed downtown 60 years after they were buried. Surprises crop up all the time when digging.
I agree that a hazardous material plan is important.
Think about flooding. If you place a stop downhill of a park you could get water runoff to it. Assessing the topography is important for stops.Stop placement is even part of the environmental assessment. From the many discussions on the topic this is clearly of huge importance to people.
Is it, I scrolled through and don't see anything. If it is, I am not really sure why that needs to be a piece of an environmental study.
Do you think a stop should be right outside a fire exit? What about next to a situation like the docks entrance for Bartle Hall?
If it's a more industrial area, locating next to a piece of loud industrial machinery would be a bad idea.
You're studying the environment to find out what impacts the plan and why you did what you did.
If this leads to adding stops this change impacts the project cost which is important when validating the design for funding. If something blocks adding a stop outside a minority neighborhood you have to be able to explain why
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Council approved the bond sale. Loar and Hall voted no.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Sole source. Easy peasy.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
This may have been asked before but will the new vehicles be identical to the existing ones?
Would love to see the route map sticker replaced with an animated LED Screen.
Even a very basic LED station screen like the one on the NYC subway would be helpful.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34028
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
- beautyfromashes
- One Park Place
- Posts: 7290
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
People always want to hate what someone else is excited about and they don’t understand.
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
It's more nuanced than that in both cases, but it's our reality.
- KCPowercat
- Ambassador
- Posts: 34028
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
- Location: Quality Hill
- Contact:
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Those two drive me insane. They don't seem to add anything of value to any topic.
-
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 9862
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
They both ran unopposed. There wasn't any chance for people to pick the best candidate.KCPowercat wrote: ↑Fri Feb 26, 2021 9:53 am Those two drive me insane. They don't seem to add anything of value to any topic.
A political action committee that does nothing but finds candidates for city council so people at least have a choice would do a lot of good. It's far harder to win the vote without being a decent person if your primary is highly competitive. Not everyone can be the most conservative or most liberal.
We should have 3-5 people running for every seat.
- normalthings
- Mark Twain Tower
- Posts: 8018
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm
Re: Phase 2 streetcar to UMKC
Oversized load permit issued for the delivery of the streetcar concrete electrical boxes. Each box will weight 50,000 lbs.
Start: March 2021
End: September 2021
https://compasskc.kcmo.org/EnerGov_Prod ... b=moreinfo
Start: March 2021
End: September 2021
https://compasskc.kcmo.org/EnerGov_Prod ... b=moreinfo