I’ve said this before several times on here- I don’t really care about the size or the “cookie cutter” whatever approach to the physical stadium. All I care about is what spin-off is built around it. That’s the true battle.GRID wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:49 pm What are you talking about. I just said Target Field is great. The metrodome sucked. They were both downtown. Location had nothing to do with increased attendance, a new much better stadium did. KC's stadium is fine. It's not just fine, it's one of the best stadiums in the league to watch a game at. So KC Is not going to get more fans with a new stadium, especially if not even as good a place to watch a game as Kauffman is.
You apparently will see what you want to see though.
Most downtown stadiums see increases in attendance- if there was no benefit to this, they wouldn’t try to move. And yes, being in proximity to the stadium does improve people’s chances of going who live by. Just because you wouldn’t doesn’t mean others don’t. Ok, I will grant that people in your age range may not spontaneously go to games like that. But, I know several who would and have said “if Royals were downtown I’d actually go to a few games” instead of the zero they attend now. Going to a restaurant and/or bar before a game and being able to walk to the stadium actually appeals to some people, and would make up for the fact they have to go see a piece of shit baseball team. That’s how you get more fans even when they suck. Not hard.
P.S. the top sports architecture firms in the world aren’t gonna design a dud in their hometown