OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by DaveKCMO »

Parking is already overbuilt. Let’s add more and dilute the $25 million transit investment.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by flyingember »

DaveKCMO wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 8:59 am Parking is already overbuilt. Let’s add more and dilute the $25 million transit investment.
And yet the authority has parking as the very first and second FAQ items

https://kcstreetcar.org/about-streetcar/faqs/

It's also worth pointing the owner of the land and the primary funder of the streetcar expansion are one and the same and one of their primary missions is in the area of transportation. Think about what it means if they're ok with adding parking.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

I am 100% on the let's built less parking bandwagon. However, its a chicken and egg problem with useful regional transit and/or bringing jobs and amenities downtown. We are sub 1 space per bed now which is progress.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by flyingember »

normalthings wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 1:07 pm I am 100% on the let's built less parking bandwagon. However, its a chicken and egg problem with useful regional transit and/or bringing jobs and amenities downtown. We are sub 1 space per bed now which is progress.
There's transit to the area today and the location isn't important enough to be listed on the schedule or run more than hourly. Look at how there's an entity willing to pay for one seat transit to UMKC because the bus system doesn't provide this.
https://ridekc.org/assets/uploads/route ... /77swk.pdf
77 is on the planned redesign to end earlier in the day. Workers will be more likely to drive home as a result.


If we want to drive less parking demand downtown start on the supply side.

Not replacing one bus and buying bikes every year could provide 250 bikes per year. Get a match and KC could rival NYC for bikes in the system per capita in a few years. A program where apartments get bikes placed on site at no cost for providing fewer parking spots per unit would be an interesting program.


It's not just downtown that this is needed. NKC is also looking at rail because zero of the four bus routes go all the way to UMKC as well.

There's a brand new ~300 unit complex coming at 23rd/Swift. It's walkable to thousands of jobs + amenities and is within blocks of all 4 bus lines + the flex service.
It's getting 419 parking spaces. that's a little less than 1.5:1
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Collison reporting concert venue paused (cost) and Bar + Rec paused due to streetcar extension design
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Big project in the works
Consideration of Resolution Approving a Surface Parking License (Berkley Riverfront, Parcels 4, 5 and 6) and a Ground Lease with Purchase Option (Berkley Riverfront, Parcel 8 )
User avatar
im2kull
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3956
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by im2kull »

normalthings wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 7:28 pm Big project in the works
Consideration of Resolution Approving a Surface Parking License (Berkley Riverfront, Parcels 4, 5 and 6) and a Ground Lease with Purchase Option (Berkley Riverfront, Parcel 8 )
Physically big.. and hopefully tall.. or big as in "unique"?
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

im2kull wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:38 pm
normalthings wrote: Sun Oct 24, 2021 7:28 pm Big project in the works
Consideration of Resolution Approving a Surface Parking License (Berkley Riverfront, Parcels 4, 5 and 6) and a Ground Lease with Purchase Option (Berkley Riverfront, Parcel 8 )
Physically big.. and hopefully tall.. or big as in "unique"?
Both but not tall. Project on parcel 8 and surrounding 3 parcels will be parking (until developed).
User avatar
Critical_Mass
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 996
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Union Hill

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by Critical_Mass »

I don't know what besides a SKC relocation could justify tying up parcels 4, 5, and 6 (pretty much all the remaining land) for surface parking.
User avatar
alejandro46
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1356
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 11:24 pm
Location: King in the North(Land)

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by alejandro46 »

Critical_Mass wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:43 am I don't know what besides a SKC relocation could justify tying up parcels 4, 5, and 6 (pretty much all the remaining land) for surface parking.
Womens scoccer stadium maybe? They passed on the training facility to Riverside that was originally proposed.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18231
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by FangKC »

If it's a music amphitheater, my head is going to explode. lol.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

FangKC wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:41 pm If it's a music amphitheater, my head is going to explode. lol.
One of those was already proposed for riverfront. Two if we count Casino KC
CorneliusFB
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2021 3:40 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by CorneliusFB »

alejandro46 wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 11:01 am
Critical_Mass wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:43 am I don't know what besides a SKC relocation could justify tying up parcels 4, 5, and 6 (pretty much all the remaining land) for surface parking.
Womens scoccer stadium maybe? They passed on the training facility to Riverside that was originally proposed.
Winner!

https://www.kcwoso.com/news/kansas-city ... rst-nwsl-p

We took our family to the game last Friday and had a blast. My lasting thought from the evening was, “How cool would this be to have downtown”. Really excited the Longs are making this further commitment to the city and the players.
kcjak
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2435
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by kcjak »

Love the openness of the entrance plaza - should be really active on match days. And optimistic to see the streetcar in the renderings!
WoodDraw
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3386
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by WoodDraw »

User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 34028
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by KCPowercat »

Exciting news
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by normalthings »

Hope people enjoy! Really shows how great downtown MLS would be.


Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
KC_JAYHAWK
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:33 am
Location: Waldo

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by KC_JAYHAWK »

KCPowercat wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 7:19 amExciting news
Yeah, too bad Children's Mercy Park wasn't built there as well, could have been a great soccer complex and solidified KC as the soccer Capital of the US.
WoodDraw
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3386
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:53 pm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by WoodDraw »

It’s a fun project. Will probably help them attract great players with dedicated facilities.

It does make me a little sad it’s not big enough for internationals, but one step at a time. Just move skc downtown already please.
earthling
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8519
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 2:27 pm
Location: milky way, orion arm

Re: OFFICIAL: Port Authority Riverfront Project

Post by earthling »

11K capacity that is expandable is nice. And privately funded. Almost appears to be an Escher effect in first pic, the way the lower entrance sticks out.
Post Reply