We've had at least one mayor live in the Northland, no? Kay Barnes lives (or at least used to live) in Briarcliff.aknowledgeableperson wrote:It is quite possible that there could be 6 council members from the Northland in 10 years. And throw in a mayor from the Northland. You do have a warning.kboish wrote:Did this tie with 2 north landers voting against an urban downtown? Talk about a forewarning for the future.
Anyway, do you think this is a good thing? I definitely don't. To be truthfully honest, I don't even think the Northland should be a part of Kansas City. It shares no characteristics of "Kansas City." And it is such a large, sprawling, sparsely populated place that it shouldn't be mostly one city. Gladstone, Parkville, etc. should have grabbed up that land because kc north is really just a continuation of those towns.
Of course this is all just how I feel this city would be ideally. I realize that KC would not be "growing" according to the numbers if this were the case. And of course our city leaders don't want to acknowledge the fact that our city is afflicted with the same problems as other midwest/ rust belt cities so that wouldn't work. With the northland we can say we are "bigger" than STL and Pittsburgh and Cincy and others, and that we haven't lost population like all these other cities lol!
But of course, the growth of the northland is good for Kansas City right? It brings in tax dollars. But of course that money is going to improving the northland, not the city center, so what does it matter?
Others may disagree, but I wish Kansas City never annexed into the northland. And a majority of council members and the mayor living in the northland is a negative thing. The last thing we need is most of the power to be in a land of nothing that is the northland. This will help destroy Kansas City. A city has to be based around something, a downtown, a core, and the northland isn't based around anything really. It's just pointless sprawl forever. And it is a really brutal thing when it gets down to voting. Kansas City voters are split in two and it is totally stupid. Of course northlanders want different things than Kansas Citians.
And I realize this is all pointless, because we aren't going to de-annex. Oh well, still frustrating to me.
(I really don't hate the northland, don't get me wrong. It's a fine place if you want to live away from others in a woodsy setting. The nature is great in places. It just has no business being considered Kansas City.)