Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

KC topics that don't fit anywhere else.
User avatar
Steve52
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:26 pm

Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Steve52 »

By CHRISTINE VENDEL
The Kansas City Star

A delay in taking soil samples at the site of a new police training academy will cost Kansas City taxpayers an extra $212,500, police commissioners said Tuesday.

The additional money will be paid to a construction company that could not work for 118 days while it awaited results of the soil samples.

In addition, when necessary soil samples finally were conducted, they showed problems with the soil and underlying rock that will require nearly $300,000 to fix.

The site also lacks water and electricity because of unforeseen conditions. That means construction workers must truck in 50 loads of water and temporarily hook up power to the site at a cost of about $29,000.

In all, the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners on Tuesday approved $540,888 in change orders for the $27 million police academy being built at Pleasant Valley Road and Shoal Creek Parkway in Kansas City, North. The money to pay for the increases will come from a $1 million contingency fund included in the cost of the facility.

“Who’s managing this?â€
User avatar
kucer
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1143
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 4:35 pm
Location: PVKS

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by kucer »

the city can't run a freaking project like this, yet we should trust them with this biosphere project over the TSC???? 

oh boy....  let me predict an unforeseen problem with this ridiculous biosphere project.  they won't think about wind and how it's going to fill that roof like a sail and have it blast off into Columbia.  hopefully for MU fans it will land on Mike Alden...

[quote]“There’s so much money in this project that no one thinks that they’re accountable for it — that it’s somebody else’s money. But it’s really everybody’s money,â€
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12656
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

kucer wrote: the city can't run a freaking project like this, yet we should trust them with this biosphere project over the TSC???? 

oh boy....  let me predict an unforeseen problem with this ridiculous biosphere project.  they won't think about wind and how it's going to fill that roof like a sail and have it blast off into Columbia.  hopefully for MU fans it will land on Mike Alden...

hmmm.. i think we'll be hearing this exact thing again down the line with this giant money grab that is about to possibly get approved.
City - Police Department Building

County - TSC

Two different entities.

Oh, by the way

City - Sprint Arena
I may be right.  I may be wrong.  But there is a lot of gray area in-between.
knucklehead
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1367
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 1:51 pm
Location: Martin City

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by knucklehead »

This article is an example of an inherient bias in media reporting. The costs overruns experienced by someone like Sprint are not reported but cost overruns of an government entity are reported. The lack of reporting on cost overruns on private projects causes some to conclude that cost overruns are far more prevalant on government projects than private projects. In reality, private entities do not make there cost overrun information public.

The overruns are within the $1 million contingency included in the budget. Thus, the fair conclusion is that the project is still under budget. Yet the headline and article portray this as a blunder and the newspaper commits fairly substantial column inches to the story (the headline in the paper is oversized and bold).  Gosh, the project is still under budget but the sky is falling. I wonder is this could be a reflection of the economic incentives newspapers have to sensationalize and pander.
User avatar
Steve52
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:26 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Steve52 »

http://www.mwhglobal.com/bio_global.asp

Someones in charge aren't they?
Last edited by Steve52 on Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7437
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by shinatoo »

Those are all cost that would have come up anyway, if the test had been done on time or not. The only real loss was project delays. Not saying it shouldn't have been done early on as stated but to say there is an additional cost is inaccurate.

Samples done on time or not, the project would have incurred those cost. That's why they build in contingency money to the budget.

Mountian out of a molehill.
User avatar
Thaine
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:46 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Thaine »

Not sure but I think its a $12MM facility. 
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17197
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by GRID »

Same stuff happens everyday in the private industry, I know it's not tax dollars (sometimes it is indirectly), but it's just the way the worlds turns, you can't predict everything 100% accurate all the time.

A lot of projects get done on time and under budget, but you will never see a thread about that, nor will you see press coverage.
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by dangerboy »

^ Right.  We have lots of projects that have been successful, on time and on budget... Catch basin replacement, KCI terminal renovations, Liberty Memorial renovation, Union Station renovation, Chouteau Bridge replacement, Grandview Triangle rebuilding, massive street resurfacing in the last two years, I-70 rebuilding in the E-Jack, etc.
User avatar
Thaine
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:46 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Thaine »

Not much mileage in the Star coming out and saying what a great job the City is doing.  Just won't happen. 
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7437
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by shinatoo »

dangerboy wrote: ^ Right.  We have lots of projects that have been successful, on time and on budget... Catch basin replacement, KCI terminal renovations, Liberty Memorial renovation, Union Station renovation, Chouteau Bridge replacement, Grandview Triangle rebuilding, massive street resurfacing in the last two years, I-70 rebuilding in the E-Jack, etc.
IRS Building.
shaffe
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2421
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 2:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by shaffe »

aknowledgeableperson wrote: City - Police Department Building

County - TSC

Two different entities.
maybe that's the scariest part of all
User avatar
Thaine
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 607
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:46 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Thaine »

City builds its own projects (with some consultants) and issued about 130 Notice to Proceeds last year.  County hires consultant/managers by the project and does a lot of Parks type landscaping and some storm sewer work out in the County.  And I think a few projects like the Stroud's street/Bridge fixing and maybe they're widening Colbern road.  Maybe 5-10 Notices to Proceed a year.

Who is going to watch the TSC work?
User avatar
Roanoker
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2199
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 12:16 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Roanoker »

Thaine wrote: Not much mileage in the Star coming out and saying what a great job the City is doing.  Just won't happen. 
That's *our* job. Oh, wait. I'm just a surface lot. It's *your* job!  :D
“Give up money, give up fame, give up science, give the earth itself and all it contains rather than do an immoral act.” —Thomas Jefferson (1785)
Deleted User

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Deleted User »

why wasn't this built downtown on one of the many, ugly surface lots near the Police Station?

Just one more shortsighted oversight in a sea of thousands of small decisions that decentralize the city.

Sprawl it out there KC!
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7437
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by shinatoo »

Michael® wrote: why wasn't this built downtown on one of the many, ugly surface lots near the Police Station?

Just one more shortsighted oversight in a sea of thousands of small decisions that decentralize the city.

Sprawl it out there KC!
It's a huge complex that has a police station, driving range, and indor and outdoor firing range. Plus, it generates no tax revenue so it might as well be in a greenfield.
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12656
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

^^^^^
Yes, that is just what we need - an outdoor shooting range downtown.  michael is criticizing the thing and he doesn't even know what it is.
I may be right.  I may be wrong.  But there is a lot of gray area in-between.
User avatar
Gladstoner
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2036
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 6:38 pm
Location: Far from the middle of nowhere

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Gladstoner »

shinatoo wrote: It's a huge complex that has a police station, driving range, and indor and outdoor firing range. Plus, it generates no tax revenue so it might as well be in a greenfield.
Are you describing the proposed academy or the east loop?  :)
A fool and your money are soon united.
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7437
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by shinatoo »

Gladstoner wrote: Are you describing the proposed academy or the east loop?  :)
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Deleted User

Re: Taxpayers will pay for city’s blunder

Post by Deleted User »

aknowledgeableperson wrote: ^^^^^
Yes, that is just what we need - an outdoor shooting range downtown.  michael is criticizing the thing and he doesn't even know what it is.
you've never heard of an indoor shooting range? And if they need to use long range they can drive out to the country and plink.

shinatoo wrote: It's a huge complex that has a police station, driving range, and indor and outdoor firing range. Plus, it generates no tax revenue so it might as well be in a greenfield.
No tax revenue automatically justifies keeping this out of downtown... NO.
There are acres of undeveloped lots near city hall and the Police station that could have used an urban police academy. It also would have made downtown appear safer.
Post Reply