Attracting corporate HQs

KC topics that don't fit anywhere else.
trailerkid
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 11284
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 4:49 pm

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by trailerkid »

There is a lot of talk about burbs within the metro competing for the headquarters of KC-based corporations (H&R, W&R). KC is not a big enough metropolis to have such infighting going on over these headquarters-- it's more important that the metro retains a Cerner rather than which specific part of town it calls home.

It is time we stop feeding off of ourselves and start concentrate on bringing new corporate HQ to the metro. Companies based in California are especially vulnerable right now because of the its dubious economy and reported horrible business conditions. Jo Co business leaders should place emphasis on recruiting HQ from California and start ignoring recruiting KCMO businesses. KCMO could also really build up KC, North near the airport as a pseudo Coporate Woods II. We need to retain and expand KC-based businesses, but also need to capitalize on our educated population, work ethic, easy airport transportation, and affordablility that make KC one of the best places to do business in the country.

Here's an article I found about an area of Cali struggling to remain attractive to business...
Copyright 2003 The Press Enterprise Co.
THE BUSINESS PRESS/CALIFORNIA

April 7, 2003, Monday

SECTION: Pg. 1

LENGTH: 982 words

HEADLINE: Inland Empire Focus : Lights are on, but nobody's home : Large companies find other neighborhoods for corporate headquarters

BYLINE: Joseph Ascenzi; The Business Press/California

BODY:



By many accounts, California is a less-than-ideal place to
conduct business.

The state's economy is sluggish, its energy costs are high and
much of the state has poor air quality.

Most important for businesses, however, California's
environmental regulations are among the toughest -- if not the
toughest -- in the United States.

A survey released last summer by Development Counsellors
International, a New York firm that tracks economic development,
found that 57% of respondents rated California the "least
favorable" business climate of any state.

With those factors working against it, the Inland Empire may
seem unlikely to attract corporate headquarters, or western
regional headquarters, in the next five to 10 years.

But several economists and economic development specialists in
and outside the market say the two-county region is poised to
acquire its share of both during the next decade, either by
attracting business headquarters from outside the region or
growing the ones that are already in the region.

"With all of that negative sentiment, there are still a lot of
businesses that have no choice, they have to have a presence in
California," said Rob DeRocker, executive vice president for
Development Counsellors International. "It's going to be tough
to make what happened in the Silicon Valley happen in Riverside,
but it can be done."


Holes to fill

Only 16 companies with 200 or more employees maintain corporate
headquarters in Riverside and San Bernardino counties, according
to the Inland Empire Economic Partnership in San Bernardino, a
nonprofit agency that recruits businesses to the region.

For the region's economy to mature, attract more high-end jobs
and ultimately become more than the unofficial warehouse and
distribution center capital of the western United States, it
must attract more corporate offices, said Michael Beck, deputy
Riverside city manager and former economic development manager
for the University of California, Riverside Office of Economic
Development.

"The Inland Empire doesn't compete for this kind of business
with New York or Seattle, and it never will," Beck said. "Boeing
is never going to set up its headquarters here. But we can grow
our own, and we can do what Orange County has been spending the
last 20 years doing: attract more western regional headquarters.
There are a lot of businesses that want to have a presence here,
and we should go after them."

But obstacles to attracting corporate centers remain, said John
Husing, regional economist who tracks economic patterns in
Riverside and San Bernardino counties.

Corporate headquarters bring with them executives who usually
want high-end homes in the 3,500- to 4,200-square-foot range
with price tags of $ 500,000 to $ 750,000, Husing said.

For now, that kind of high-end housing in the Inland Empire is
rare, and its confined mainly to the Coachella Valley and
pockets of Temecula, Murrieta and south Corona, said Borre
Winckle, executive director of the Building Industry Association
Riverside County Chapter.

"We will get that kind of housing but it's going to come in
gradually," Winckle said. "It won't happen overnight."

Businesses want to place their offices in areas that have a pool
of well-educated workers from which to draw, which the Inland
Empire lacks, Husing said.

But the region is building more high-end housing, and it's work
force eventually will become more oriented to high technology,
which is the reason Husing believes more companies will call the
region home during the next 10 years.

"If you want to attract corporate headquarters, those are two of
the biggest things you need," he said. "In a way, it's the same
reason we don't have more high-tech companies. The work force
that you need isn't here yet."

The guaranteed future growth of Ontario International Airport
will attract corporate office, Husing said. The airport will
become increasingly important as Los Angeles International
Airport builds out and Orange County struggles to build a major
international airport.

"Corporations always want to put their headquarters near major
airports," he said.,

Most of the corporate headquarters in the Inland Empire, Husing
said, are businesses that were started and grew up in the area.
Other companies, like Indianapolis-based Guidant Corp., the
maker of stent devices used to improve blood flow, have major
facilities in the region.

"Those are the kinds of operations we need more of," Husing said.

Guidant's Temecula operation employs about 3,000 people but is
one of the three West Coast facilities the company maintains and
is technically not considered a headquarters, Guidant
spokeswoman Kim Boesche said.

Businesses in the state are so over-taxed and over-regulated
that attracting outside businesses to move their headquarters to
the two-county region will be a struggle, said Mary Jane
Olhasso, director of Ontario economic development.

The region's best approach will be to retain existing corporate
hubs and persuade growing businesses in the area to establish
their headquarters locally.

"Chief executive officers just aren't interested in doing
business in California, so we're going to have to grow our own,"
Olhasso said. "But look at the trend during the last 10 years:
Companies have been moving out of Los Angeles and Orange
counties, they haven't been coming in."

Olhasso cited the Development Counsellors survey, which is
conducted every three years. In 1999, only 25% of those who
responded said they believed California was the least favorable
place to conduct business. Three years later, that number
doubled.

DeRocker blamed much of the negative perception on the media,
which reported the state's energy problems but downplayed the
fact that the "crisis" was overblown to begin with, he said.

GRAPHIC: LARRY ROSE ; (1)Dock loader Tim Flock moves goods at Stater Bros.' corporate headquarter in Colton. Stater Bros. is one of a handful of large companies headquartered in the Inland Empire. (2)Dock loader Tim Flock moves goods at Stater Bros.' corporate headquarters in Colton.; PHOTOS
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by dangerboy »

Yes, you are right. In fact, KCMO and the State of Missouri have been trying for several years to get Johnnson County and the state of Kansas sign a non-compete clause for intra-metro relocations. Unfortunately they refuse to do so and keep offereing extra incentives if a company will come across the state line. Ideally incentives would be reserved for companies that are new to the metro area, are building major expansions, or are in danger of leaving the metro area.

The thing that is really interesting now is that the incentives that Kansas offered in the 1980s and early 1990s have begun to expire, and now many companies that left KC for Joco are now looking at moving back to get yet another set of relocation incentives. Until Kansas disarms, I say turn about is fair play.

The idea mention about targeting California companies has already been tried by the KC Area Development Council, not just Joco. There was media campaign and everything in California, but so far no results.

http://www.smartkc.com/energy/

http://smartkc.com/KCHQ/5a00_kchq.htm
trailerkid
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 11284
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 4:49 pm

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by trailerkid »

They need more than media campaigns and the like. KC economic development needs well-connected salespeople familiar with corporate America to work full-time on recruiting companies to relocate to the KC area. We need people employed nationwide and internationally to sell metro KC. We can only play musical chairs with the same companies and outdoor stores for so long...let's put more attention on the outside.

I know, you're saying this is a bit much considering the state of roads and schools. But we must be extremely aggressive in luring, expanding and retaining companies who pay high wages or else all we'll be left with are government-subsidized, pathetic production plants.
User avatar
KCK
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3561
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Contact:

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by KCK »

dangerboy wrote:Yes, you are right. In fact, KCMO and the State of Missouri have been trying for several years to get Johnnson County and the state of Kansas sign a non-compete clause for intra-metro relocations. Unfortunately they refuse to do so and keep offereing extra incentives if a company will come across the state line. Ideally incentives would be reserved for companies that are new to the metro area, are building major expansions, or are in danger of leaving the metro area.

The thing that is really interesting now is that the incentives that Kansas offered in the 1980s and early 1990s have begun to expire, and now many companies that left KC for Joco are now looking at moving back to get yet another set of relocation incentives. Until Kansas disarms, I say turn about is fair play.

The idea mention about targeting California companies has already been tried by the KC Area Development Council, not just Joco. There was media campaign and everything in California, but so far no results.

http://www.smartkc.com/energy/

http://smartkc.com/KCHQ/5a00_kchq.htm
Im sure you could get KCK government to sign a non compete clause with KCMO. It wont help much since the only thing we took from KCMO is the shrine rodeo. Instead of trying for corporate HQ''s lets go for regional HQ's. We can boast the fact we sit in the middle of the country, and have better air travel than Omaha and Oklahoma City.
New Body, New Job, New SOUL!!!!

KCK IS BACK!!!!
Good2Great
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 3:24 pm

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by Good2Great »

I think Kleenex may be on sale at Walgreens....maybe then you can continue to cry on your own. Toughen up! It'sdog eat dog and every community is seeking to expand its tax base.

THIS is the reason america has DEvolved into a conglomeration of WUSSES!
KCSKYSCRAPERS changed my life. I was on the edge until I visited this site. Now I find myself longing to dive off a 60 story building onto a frozen fountain paying tribute to the St. Louis Arch.
User avatar
bahua
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 7:39 pm
Location: Out of Town
Contact:

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by bahua »

CAPITAL WUSSES
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 34018
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by KCPowercat »

NOBODY IS WINNING. THE "PROS" NEED TO DO A BETTER JOB GETTING CO FROM OUTSIDE THE CITY

Posted from a mobile
http://downtownkcmo.blogspot.com

Tweeting live from Big 12 tournament @downtownkc
TheDude
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 201
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 3:30 pm
Location: Center of the mind

Attracting corporate HQs

Post by TheDude »

combined with the 140 yrs of border hatred, a noncompete between KS and MO will NEVER, EVER HAPPEN given the nature of economic development, esp in this area. haven't you noticed the one asking for the noncompete is always the one getting the shit kicked out of it?
"ALWAYS be closing"
trailerkid
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 11284
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 4:49 pm

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by trailerkid »

Is KC really as bad as it looks when attracting corporate HQ?  I'm not even talking about relocating stuff from San Diego or Chicago, but how hard is it to poach different companies from places like Oklahoma or Nebraska? Of course, growing our existing businesses is important, but aren't we way too unaggressive in bringing more jobs here?
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 34018
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by KCPowercat »

Makes you wonder what the KCADC is doing, doesn't it.
http://downtownkcmo.blogspot.com

Tweeting live from Big 12 tournament @downtownkc
User avatar
dangerboy
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 9029
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 8:28 am
Location: West 39th St. - KCMO

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by dangerboy »

KCADC does list some new HQ's on their web site, http://thinkkc.com/1_kcnews/1c_article_ ... c_2004.htm

They are mostly small companies.  There just aren't many big conglomerates relocating these days.  Boeing's move to Chicago was the last big relocation, and it was only a very small executive office that moved.
User avatar
Slappy the Wang
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 5:30 pm

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by Slappy the Wang »

KCPowercat wrote: Makes you wonder what the KCADC is doing, doesn't it.
The reality is that very few corporate HQ's are in play right now for new HQ facilities.  KCADC realizes this and has shifted its emphasis from the recruitment of  high-tech corporate HQ's to manufacturing/industrial based firms.....that's simply what's n play right now.

I noticed the ONEKC logo is no longer on this forum.  How come?  They pimped THIS SITE at their last meeting to 200 developers, contractors, archtects and real estate pros....just about 3 weeks ago.
Be green or go Broke Tryin'
ignatius
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2003 2:42 pm
Location: Midtown/Downtown
Contact:

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by ignatius »

When the Mexican/Asian trade ties kick into full gear as well as the Richards Gabeur freight center and massive free trade zone at the airport, more global distributions centers are not only expected but considered to be a given.  It could translate into a regional HQs in some cases.

HQs will always be tough to attract given every city is making the effort.  The California exodus was the last opportunity but there do not seem to be as many defections lately.  We stole a couple from Omaha (Aquila).  Regional siphoning might be the only opportunities - not that it's a good thing.  Maybe if MO allows stem cell research and other states do not, bio-HQs would be attracted to KC/STL.  

Being the second largest rail center, third largest trucking center, fifth largest telcom center and massive inland port , these are the KC's assets that should be exploited.
User avatar
Slappy the Wang
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 5:30 pm

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by Slappy the Wang »

ignatius wrote: Being the second largest rail center, third largest trucking center, fifth largest telcom center and massive inland port , these are the KC's assets that should be exploited.
Exactly!!!!  Having the hoydy toydy stuff is great...it's always nice to have acommercial mix....but KC has gone out of it's way for the past 15 years to deny the industrial & cowtown images that are at the core of its' foundation.  Those aren't negative images...they make us what we are.
Be green or go Broke Tryin'
trailerkid
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 11284
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 4:49 pm

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by trailerkid »

dangerboy wrote: KCADC does list some new HQ's on their web site, http://thinkkc.com/1_kcnews/1c_article_ ... c_2004.htm

They are mostly small companies.  There just aren't many big conglomerates relocating these days.  Boeing's move to Chicago was the last big relocation, and it was only a very small executive office that moved.
A T-Mobile call center...Yips.

I realize DFW is a lot bigger than KC, but just driving around there, you'll see tons of HQs for just about everything you can think of (Bombay Co., Radio Shack, Pier 1, American Airlines, etc.). And the startling thing is that I'm only talking about the Forth Worth part of the metroplex which is smaller than KC. I know DFW has one of the highest concentrations of HQs in the country, but it's still pretty impressive to be able to call so many different businesses home.

I definitely call BS whenever anyone says that major corporations are not looking for new homes. Over the last 4 years, both Pier 1 and Radio Shack have relocated their HQ within Fort Worth. Go to any major U.S. city (including KC) and you will see a reshuffling of many of the local companies every few years. KC has reshuffled/expanded the locations for Block, Sprint and Cerner all within the last 10 years.  It's just a matter of locating the companies and being aggressive with recruiting and incentives.

I mean something like Quick Trip or even Sonic? I know Quick Trip is probably tied into Tulsa oil money, but these are middle to small sized corporations that could pump a lot more money into KC's economy. Many companies that are HQed here are more likely to have local advertising firms, local suppliers, local contractors, local architects. Let's start being a bully on the block instead of the shy, introverted wallflower waiting for Lamar to dump us.
KC0KEK
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4855
Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: Neither here nor there

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by KC0KEK »

trailerkid wrote:I realize DFW is a lot bigger than KC, but just driving around there, you'll see tons of HQs for just about everything you can think of (Bombay Co., Radio Shack, Pier 1, American Airlines, etc.). And the startling thing is that I'm only talking about the Forth Worth part of the metroplex which is smaller than KC. I know DFW has one of the highest concentrations of HQs in the country, but it's still pretty impressive to be able to call so many different businesses home.
I'm sure that DFW Airport is a major factor in attracting HQs, especially those companies that prefer to have access to direct overseas flights.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 34018
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by KCPowercat »

Slappy the Wang wrote: The reality is that very few corporate HQ's are in play right now for new HQ facilities. KCADC realizes this and has shifted its emphasis from the recruitment of high-tech corporate HQ's to manufacturing/industrial based firms.....that's simply what's n play right now.

I noticed the ONEKC logo is no longer on this forum. How come? They pimped THIS SITE at their last meeting to 200 developers, contractors, archtects and real estate pros....just about 3 weeks ago.
It should still be on here...I haven't removed it.  I don't see the attracting much of ANY new business.

Just doublechecked...it's on the right hand side of the main page.
http://downtownkcmo.blogspot.com

Tweeting live from Big 12 tournament @downtownkc
trailerkid
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 11284
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 4:49 pm

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by trailerkid »

KC0KEK wrote: I'm sure that DFW Airport is a major factor in attracting HQs, especially those companies that prefer to have access to direct overseas flights.
But KCI is great for dropping off passengers and getting in/out. Status quo... :roll:
User avatar
Slappy the Wang
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1735
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 5:30 pm

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by Slappy the Wang »

Page 5 of KCADC's 2004 Annual Report notes the firms they worked with last year.  It was printed in November.  Keep in mind KCADC covers an area from North to South from St. Joe to Belton/Gardner and East to West from Blue Springs to Topeka so alot of these things aren't KCMO.

http://www.kcadc.com/About/PDF/AnnualReport2004.pdf
Be green or go Broke Tryin'
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 34018
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Attracting corporate HQs

Post by KCPowercat »

trailerkid wrote: But KCI is great for dropping off passengers and getting in/out. Status quo... :roll:
Can't force airlines to have international flights here TK...demand drives it, not the layout of the airport.
http://downtownkcmo.blogspot.com

Tweeting live from Big 12 tournament @downtownkc
Post Reply