Re: Question 1
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:37 am
I get a little pissed when I think about the total cost of a car loan and so I try to make a bigger down payment. It's kinda common sense by now...
Most people I know don't go around advertising what they paid for their cars, homes, or anything else for that matter.kcdcchef wrote: so, you are saying, that, when you buy a car, or a home, you say, well, really, it will cost this much over 10 or 25 years? i have bought a home and 2 cars, i have NEVER said that. i just say, okay, this is the sticker price, this is what the dealer adjusted it to after bargaining, this is what it costs. then, years later when you sell it, then, you say a different amount.
It is really a usage of words. The cost of the home is $412k but the cost of financing it is an additional cost. For tax purposes for captial gains, if needed, the cost is the $412k, not $412k plus the cost of interest payments.lock&load wrote: You continue to miss the point. I never said it was anything but $575 million in renovations. I said the total cost to taxpayers is $1.2 billion. You say you bought a $412k home, because that is the value of the home. That, however, is not the total cost to you. That is only the value of the home.
You buy 25 shares of stock for $5 a share. You say you paid $5 a share for the stock. However, you also paid a commission to the broker. That is a relevant cost. The cost of the underlying property/improvements is not the only relevant piece of information.
Please visit the local University in Pittsburgh and enroll in a course in Finance. You might learn something.
I am not talking about tax purposes. I am talking about out of pocket cash flow. Wrap your arms around that guys, it is not a complex issue.aknowledgeableperson wrote: It is really a usage of words. The cost of the home is $412k but the cost of financing it is an additional cost. For tax purposes for captial gains, if needed, the cost is the $412k, not $412k plus the cost of interest payments.
Your numbers have been shown to be worthless propaganda. From the Star today.Kard wrote: How did Barnes get her $18 number?
If we do the 1.2 billion (which could be the full cost of it over time):
$1,200,000,000 / 660,095* people in Jackson County
= $1817.92
$1817.92 / 25 years
= $72.72 per person per year
Is that way off? I know--people from outside Jackson County will be paying, too. So take off 30% (the SOS number) and you get around $50.
*US Census Bureau QuickFacts - http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/29/29095.html
1.50 here and a 1.50 there the next thing you know you are like the frog in the pot of boiling water. I don't want to be that frog.aknowledgeableperson wrote: Your numbers have been shown to be worthless propaganda. From the Star today.
■ How much it will cost you.
In advertisements and guest columns, stadium supporters have stated that the renovations will cost a typical Jackson County taxpayer about $1.50 a month, or the equivalent of a cup of coffee. That is, the 3/8 th-cent sales tax will cost about $18 a year based on a person’s typical retail purchases.
Since then, the stadiums campaign and The Star have done more precise calculations and come up with slightly different per-person cost numbers. The campaign had reached its figure by taking Jackson County’s median household income and applying several calculations to it. However, the campaign has since found a more recent estimate of household income, and that ends up changing the per-person cost to $20.50 a year, or $1.70 a month. In addition, The Star found a more precise way to do the calculation, based on U.S. government statistics. The per-person cost works out to $23.10 a year, or $1.93 a month. That’s not a lot different in dollar terms.
funny thing is the no campaign is little more then scare tactics, and they spend their whole day shouting at the rein that the yes campaign is scare tactics. amazing philosophy.aknowledgeableperson wrote: Your numbers have been shown to be worthless propaganda. From the Star today.
■ How much it will cost you.
In advertisements and guest columns, stadium supporters have stated that the renovations will cost a typical Jackson County taxpayer about $1.50 a month, or the equivalent of a cup of coffee. That is, the 3/8 th-cent sales tax will cost about $18 a year based on a person’s typical retail purchases.
Since then, the stadiums campaign and The Star have done more precise calculations and come up with slightly different per-person cost numbers. The campaign had reached its figure by taking Jackson County’s median household income and applying several calculations to it. However, the campaign has since found a more recent estimate of household income, and that ends up changing the per-person cost to $20.50 a year, or $1.70 a month. In addition, The Star found a more precise way to do the calculation, based on U.S. government statistics. The per-person cost works out to $23.10 a year, or $1.93 a month. That’s not a lot different in dollar terms.
All hail the Star! It has been the most unbiased and accurate media on this issue!!aknowledgeableperson wrote: Your numbers have been shown to be worthless propaganda. From the Star today.
aknowledgeableperson wrote:
So what are you bitchin' about? Hell, if the Star came out on your side of this issue you would be praising it up to high heaven.