Proposition D: Raising the gas tax
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2018 10:53 pm
I lean towards voting for Proposition D and raising the gas tax.
The Kansas City Star supports voting yes.
https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/edit ... 48390.html
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch supports voting yes.
This article on the NextStL website makes a good argument to vote NO. It's not the traditional anti-tax argument.
https://nextstl.com/2018/10/vote-no-on- ... -increase/
The part that convinces me is the part about reforming how money is spent, or lack of reform. The way the money is allocated means that a large percentage of the new money may not necessarily go to maintaining the roads and bridges we already have. There is no limit to prevent the money being spent to construct new, or expand old, roads on rural land in the suburbs.
What I worry about is the construction and real estate lobbies getting money allocated for these new roads so they can build more subdivisions on farm land at the expense of already-built areas.
In this debate, Gwen Moore makes some good arguments for voting no.
http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/pro ... v-6-ballot
The proposition:
https://www.sos.mo.gov/CMSImages/Electi ... edCopy.pdf
Is this enough reason to vote no? Or is this an argument for another day?
The Kansas City Star supports voting yes.
https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/edit ... 48390.html
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch supports voting yes.
This article on the NextStL website makes a good argument to vote NO. It's not the traditional anti-tax argument.
https://nextstl.com/2018/10/vote-no-on- ... -increase/
The part that convinces me is the part about reforming how money is spent, or lack of reform. The way the money is allocated means that a large percentage of the new money may not necessarily go to maintaining the roads and bridges we already have. There is no limit to prevent the money being spent to construct new, or expand old, roads on rural land in the suburbs.
What I worry about is the construction and real estate lobbies getting money allocated for these new roads so they can build more subdivisions on farm land at the expense of already-built areas.
In this debate, Gwen Moore makes some good arguments for voting no.
http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/pro ... v-6-ballot
The proposition:
https://www.sos.mo.gov/CMSImages/Electi ... edCopy.pdf
Is this enough reason to vote no? Or is this an argument for another day?