Urbanism, architecture, transit, strawmen, etc.

Come here to talk about topics that are not related to development, or even Kansas City.
Post Reply
swid
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 595
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:29 pm
Location: Union Hill

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by swid »

If/when something like TransitScreen comes to Kansas City, it'd be nice to have a handful of these screens scattered around downtown.
User avatar
Demosthenes
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:50 pm
Location: CBD

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by Demosthenes »

swid wrote:If/when something like TransitScreen comes to Kansas City, it'd be nice to have a handful of these screens scattered around downtown.
Ooh yea they have these in Chicago (or at least something very similar) at certain train stations. Very convenient. Nothing makes you feel more confident about taking public transit than knowing exactly when your train/bus is going to show up. This would be a no-brainer for the transit center.

Does anyone know if KCata has started a system where you can call to find when the next bus will be at a stop? They also have this is in Chicago, and it is a nice feature. So if you are at a bus stop and want to know when the next bus will stop by, all you got to do is pull out your phone. I thought I heard KC was considering this. It would definitely come in handy here, with so many routes that run buses every half hour.
User avatar
Eon Blue
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1126
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:28 pm
Location: Downtown KCMO

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by Eon Blue »

There's the KCATA Tracker by Sprout (http://m.ur.tl/dev/kcata/) that is mobile friendly - I use it daily. It doesn't tell you time to stop, but it uses real-time GPS to show where a bus is currently at on the route. I uses the ATA Web Watch data and is usually accurate to within a block or two. It even has a nifty function to tell you what percentage of buses are on-time, early or late: http://m.ur.tl/dev/kcata/ontime-graph.php
town cow
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:16 pm

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by town cow »

I also use it daily. Truly useful.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Thu Feb 09, 2017 10:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
phuqueue
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2837
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 10:33 pm

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by phuqueue »

Think this guy might have written this song in KC?
Naotaro Moriyama’s extraordinary lyrics get you thinking - The Japan News wrote:“Everywhere there are parking lots, aren’t there? Everywhere there are parking lots, indeed. Everywhere there are parking lots, you know...” The same phrase, though slightly altered, is repeated five times during the catchiest part of the song “Dokomo Kashikomo Chushajo” (Everywhere there are parking lots).

...

It may sound like nonsense, but there is a reason behind this. The song’s lyrics begin with a description that a person who is singing the song is on his way home after breaking up with his girlfriend and passing parking lot after parking lot. Hearing the repetition, I felt sad about an urban landscape in which there is nothing in particular except parking lots.
longviewmo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by longviewmo »

Figured this forum would appreciate this article:

http://gizmodo.com/6-freeway-demolition ... 1548314937
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by KCMax »

KC made the "Parking Madness" Final Four for Streestblog. We lost to Rochester, NY.

http://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/04/07/p ... rochester/

Image
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18361
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by FangKC »

Why Downtown Development May Be More Affordable Than The Suburbs
Armed with an impressive array of PowerPoint slides, computer models and property tax data, Minicozzi travels around the country to encourage municipalities to see that their downtowns, no matter how neglected, often contribute far more value in terms of tax revenue — property and sales tax combined — than even the biggest big-box store.

One of the key components of his research has been to break down the economic impact of land on a per acre basis, allowing him to make apples-to-apples comparisons between, for example, a six-story, mixed-use building (a combination of residential and commercial uses) and a single massive retail store, in the same way you might use miles-per-gallon to evaluate the fuel efficiency of a car.

Take the city of Asheville, North Carolina, where Minicozzi is based, as an example. The city, which has a population of about 83,000, realizes an astounding 1,000 percent greater return on downtown mixed-use development projects on a per acre basis compared to when ground is broken near the city limits for a sprawling retail center.

Put a different way: a typical mixed-use acre of downtown Asheville yields $150,000 more in annual tax revenue to the local government than an acre of strip malls or big-box stores.

http://tinyurl.com/nofwrx3
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by chaglang »

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/housin ... fier/8877/
That's because there's no way out, if you happen to have above-average economic power or the kind of cultural capital that attracts people with above-average economic power. Whether or not you say "hi" to your neighbors, your presence in a relatively low-income or blue-collar community will, in fact, make it easier for other college graduates to move in; to open businesses that cater to you; to induce landlords to renovate or redevelop their properties to attract other new, wealthier residents who want access to those businesses. If your city restricts housing supply (it does) and doesn't have smart rent control policies (it almost certainly doesn't), you've ultimately helped create an economically segregated neighborhood.

But it's worse than that: it doesn't even matter where you live.

Moving to a higher-income neighborhood – one where market and regulatory forces have already pushed out the low-income – means you're helping to sustain the high cost of living there, and therefore helping to keep the area segregated. You're also forcing lower-income college graduates to move to more economically marginal areas, where they in turn will push out people with even less purchasing power. You can't escape the role you play in displacement any more than a white person can escape their whiteness, because those are both subject to systemic processes that have created your relevant status and assigned its consequences. Among the classes, there is no division between "gentrifiers" and "non-gentrifiers." If you live in a city, you don't get to opt out.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by KCMax »

What Millennials Want—And Why Cities Are Right to Pay Them So Much Attention
They found that 54 percent of Millennials surveyed would consider moving to another city if it had more or better options for getting around, and 66 percent said access to high quality transportation is one of the top three criteria they would weigh when deciding where to live. Nearly half of those who owned a car said they would consider giving it up if they could count on public transportation options. Up to 86 percent said it was important for their city to offer opportunities to live and work without relying on a car.
Why Ridesharing Is a Way Bigger Deal for Suburban Seniors Than Urban Millennials
Transportation for America's recent report, "Aging in Place: Stuck Without Options," shows that as we grow too old to drive safely, alternative transportation options are a necessity but often hard to find. Based on recent surveys, 88 percent of older adults continue to drive at age 65, but that percentage drops to 69 percent by age 75. This means that by age 75, 31 percent of seniors must seek alternative ways to get around.
Millenials want it, seniors need it, seems like a no-brainer.
mean
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 11240
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 9:00 am
Location: Historic Northeast

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by mean »

Is there data in yet on whether millenials actually vote? My guess would be they're so disillusioned with politics that they don't give a shit, but I could totally be wrong.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by KCMax »

mean wrote:Is there data in yet on whether millenials actually vote? My guess would be they're so disillusioned with politics that they don't give a shit, but I could totally be wrong.
In '08 and '12 they turned out about the same as Boomers did back when they were at age. It remains to be seen whether they'll increase their turnout as they get older as Boomers did, or whether they've been turned off politics.
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12662
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

There was some talk about this recently. Yes, they voted in '08 and in '12 but it seemed their numbers were down in '10. And the concern is that their numbers will also be down in '14 and that helps fuel the speculation of the GOP takeover of both houses of Congress in '14.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by KCMax »

aknowledgeableperson wrote:There was some talk about this recently. Yes, they voted in '08 and in '12 but it seemed their numbers were down in '10. And the concern is that their numbers will also be down in '14 and that helps fuel the speculation of the GOP takeover of both houses of Congress in '14.
Down overall or down compared to what other young people have done in past generations? Overall interest goes down in mid-terms, and historically young people - not just millenials - have not turned out for midterms.
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12662
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

Yes, midterm elections are down overall but the concern is the downturn will be greater among the young. They came out to support the Big O for his elections but dropped greater than those who voted GOP. Of course there is a somewhat smaller concern for Tea Party turnout.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by KCMax »

aknowledgeableperson wrote:Yes, midterm elections are down overall but the concern is the downturn will be greater among the young. They came out to support the Big O for his elections but dropped greater than those who voted GOP. Of course there is a somewhat smaller concern for Tea Party turnout.
I know, but the point is young people never vote in midterms, even going back to Boomers. Midterms tend to only be highly-engaged voters, which tend to be the retired. I haven't seen any evidence that Millennials are less likely to vote as a generation as they get older any more than previous generations. Which means in future elections, they will begin to demand mass transit even more.
User avatar
KCMax
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 24051
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: The basement of a Ross Dress for Less
Contact:

Re: Urbanism, architecture, transit, etc.

Post by KCMax »

A Crosswalk Too Far: Vote for the Least Crossable Street in America

Image
There’s an apartment complex that straddles NW Vivion Road in Kansas City, Missouri. But as reader Kevin Carlyle points out, walking from the apartments on one side of the streets to the office or to resident amenities like a pool involves a one-mile trip to Waukomis Drive and back.
Post Reply