Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Transportation topics in KC
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by pash »

.
Last edited by pash on Sun Feb 05, 2017 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by flyingember »

pash wrote:St Louis's version has two towers?! They always get the cooler stuff!
wider river and different channel position = different bridge

longer bridge in StL by almost 50% over KC
skinnier at 6 lanes vs 8 lanes in KC
both towers are shorter too. 400 feet vs 550 feet in KC
more cables in KC, 13x8 vs 10x4 in KC
User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by chaglang »

St. Louis has the world's best bridge fans. Just ask them.
User avatar
im2kull
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3957
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by im2kull »

flyingember wrote: wider river and different channel position = different bridge

longer bridge in StL by almost 50% over KC
skinnier at 6 lanes vs 8 lanes in KC
both towers are shorter too. 400 feet vs 550 feet in KC
more cables in KC, 13x8 vs 10x4 in KC

No, STL just gets more funding from MODOT than KC. It has nothing to do with a wider river, and different channel position. Don't kid yourself.


Also, I'd check your facts again. The Bond bridge is not 550ft tall, it's 316ft. To even believe that it's over 500ft tall is laughable, as KC's tallest building is barely that height.

One other thing, our bridge is 6 lanes..not 8.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by flyingember »

im2kull wrote:
flyingember wrote: wider river and different channel position = different bridge

longer bridge in StL by almost 50% over KC
skinnier at 6 lanes vs 8 lanes in KC
both towers are shorter too. 400 feet vs 550 feet in KC
more cables in KC, 13x8 vs 10x4 in KC

No, STL just gets more funding from MODOT than KC. It has nothing to do with a wider river, and different channel position. Don't kid yourself.


Also, I'd check your facts again. The Bond bridge is not 550ft tall, it's 316ft. To even believe that it's over 500ft tall is laughable, as KC's tallest building is barely that height.

One other thing, our bridge is 6 lanes..not 8.
of course it gets more funding, there's roughly twice as many people on the MO side of StL as the Missouri side of KC. It should get more funding.

You are right on the height of the bridge, but One KC Place is 624 feet tall.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by flyingember »

im2kull wrote: One other thing, our bridge is 6 lanes..not 8.
7 lanes. there's an onramp lane that sticks around to become an offramp lane on the other side when going NB. it works because it was designed to have 8 lanes of traffic someday
User avatar
im2kull
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3957
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by im2kull »

flyingember wrote:
im2kull wrote: One other thing, our bridge is 6 lanes..not 8.
7 lanes. there's an onramp lane that sticks around to become an offramp lane on the other side when going NB. it works because it was designed to have 8 lanes of traffic someday
They don't include the on-ramp/off-ramp as an actual lane when counting lanes either, so it's just 6 with no plans for expansion.


I knew somebody would mention this, a little surprised it took that long lol!
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by flyingember »

im2kull wrote:
flyingember wrote:
im2kull wrote: One other thing, our bridge is 6 lanes..not 8.
7 lanes. there's an onramp lane that sticks around to become an offramp lane on the other side when going NB. it works because it was designed to have 8 lanes of traffic someday
They don't include the on-ramp/off-ramp as an actual lane when counting lanes either, so it's just 6 with no plans for expansion.


I knew somebody would mention this, a little surprised it took that long lol!
yeah, completely wrong. it's obvious you aren't learning about the bridge facts before making statements

http://www.kcicon.org/faq.html
Q: What type of new bridge will be constructed
A: A: A 6-lane, landmark, cable-stay, Missouri River bridge expandable to eight lanes.
here's the same type of info for the StL bridge

http://www.newriverbridge.org/overview-bridge.html
The bridge is two lanes in each direction, but is wide enough to be restriped for three lanes in each direction if traffic volumes warrant and additional funding is secured.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18237
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by FangKC »

City Manager Brian Platt tweeted that lights are being repaired today on the Bond Bridge.

https://x.com/BrianDavidPlatt/status/17 ... 90500?s=20
User avatar
Chris Stritzel
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by Chris Stritzel »

FangKC wrote: Sat Mar 02, 2024 9:02 pm City Manager Brian Platt tweeted that lights are being repaired today on the Bond Bridge.

https://x.com/BrianDavidPlatt/status/17 ... 90500?s=20
Image
Image
Image
moderne
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 5535
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: Mount Hope

Re: Bond Bridge (formerly Paseo)

Post by moderne »

Love the reflection. The river appears deceptively calm.
Post Reply