500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Issues concerning Downtown as described by the Downtown Council. River to 31st Street, I-35 to Bruce R. Watkins.
User avatar
normalthings
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 8018
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:52 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by normalthings »

Take a 500’ kmz file and import to google earth.
User avatar
rxlexi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2296
Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2003 10:30 pm
Location: Briarcliff

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by rxlexi »

Chris Stritzel wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 4:08 pm
TheLastGentleman wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 3:51 pm What is QOZ?
Something Opportunity Zone. From what I found, it includes an incentive for investors.
Qualified Opportunity Zone. Not an expert, but - investors in projects within QOZs are eligible for tax incentives including deferral of capital gains that are invested in the deal, and I believe full dismissal of a percentage amount of that capital gains investment if the project is held for a specific amount of time. They were quietly a pretty big deal a couple of years back; unsure how successful they have been on a national level to incentivize real estate development.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

Just a very awkward spot for tower
User avatar
Major KC Fan
Strip mall
Strip mall
Posts: 190
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:20 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by Major KC Fan »

I’ll take a 500 foot tower ANYWHERE in the general downtown area. After years of a declining downtown, the resurgence over the last decade or so is awesome!
User avatar
beautyfromashes
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 7290
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 11:04 am

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by beautyfromashes »

Major KC Fan wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:27 am I’ll take a 500 foot tower ANYWHERE in the general downtown area. After years of a declining downtown, the resurgence over the last decade or so is awesome!
Nothing like a new high rise to get the testosterone flowing in the construction industry. "Oh yeah! Well I'm going to build one even taller!"
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17187
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by GRID »

UMKC Roo wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 4:05 pm We literally heard from someone on here less than a month ago that we wouldn't see a building that tall in "15-20 years" lol...works like a charm. Not the first time that's happened.
Pretty sure this is directed at me lol.

You can't deny the fact that KC has not built a taller building since 1989. That's 33 years. Almost every other city in the country has built a 500 footer since the 2000's, let alone since 1989. A few haven't like Memphis etc but most have including near all mid and major cities in the midwest. And when you combine that with how KC's corporate and development community has such a suburban culture, I really don't think it's that far fetched to assume it would be another 20-30 years.

And you never know. It still may be. There have been a few proposals to build bigger towers in KC that have not materialized.

It's great to see people actually thinking about such development in KC though. Downtown KC has been coming back now for 15 years so it's about time downtown started seeing developers floating bigger projects like this. I still think downtown KC also desperately needs one or two more major hotel towers. So just maybe the city will finally see some bigger projects announced in the coming years.

And I don't think it matters where it's at. I don't think that would be an awkward location. Downtown KC is already spread out to Crown Center. So long as it's somewhere in the downtown area is all that matters.

If other buildings go up on Broadway and a few towers eventually go up in the east loop, that would greatly expand the skyline nicely especially since most of KC's taller buildings will be hidden behind the 670 wall from street level soon.

Hasn't this site has already seen many plans? Didn't the Kauffman's oppose the proposed midrise buildings west of Broadway? Wouldn't they oppose this even more? I hope it happens. Broadway needs to be developed badly.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

Major KC Fan wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 10:27 am I’ll take a 500 foot tower ANYWHERE in the general downtown area. After years of a declining downtown, the resurgence over the last decade or so is awesome!
Yeah, no complaints I'll take it over nothing.

One positive I will say is that this tower should drastically improve our skyline view from the west side -- which currently is shitty
MidtownCat
Valencia Place
Valencia Place
Posts: 1930
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 12:05 pm
Location: ~Westwood~

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by MidtownCat »

This news definitely does NOT suck. Let's go!
User avatar
KC_JAYHAWK
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:33 am
Location: Waldo

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by KC_JAYHAWK »

Fountains wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 4:00 pm I'll take more towers but downtown needs infill tbh
Yep. North loop parking lots and Crossroads are prime for infill projects. Need a dozen more 10-15 story buildings, whether commercial, apartments or hotels.

I just don’t see the demand for high rise commercial in KC or most cities, post COVID. My company is HQ’d in 1KCP and it feels empty anytime I go in. I still work 90% of the time from home and I just don’t see that changing. The reason why commercial buildings are considered “mostly occupied” post COVID, is because companies are locked into long term leases. WFH isn’t going away, at least in my opinion.
User avatar
KC_JAYHAWK
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1014
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 10:33 am
Location: Waldo

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by KC_JAYHAWK »

GRID wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 12:02 pm
UMKC Roo wrote: Mon Oct 17, 2022 4:05 pm We literally heard from someone on here less than a month ago that we wouldn't see a building that tall in "15-20 years" lol...works like a charm. Not the first time that's happened.
Pretty sure this is directed at me lol.

You can't deny the fact that KC has not built a taller building since 1989. That's 33 years. Almost every other city in the country has built a 500 footer since the 2000's, let alone since 1989. A few haven't like Memphis etc but most have including near all mid and major cities in the midwest. And when you combine that with how KC's corporate and development community has such a suburban culture, I really don't think it's that far fetched to assume it would be another 20-30 years.

And you never know. It still may be. There have been a few proposals to build bigger towers in KC that have not materialized.

It's great to see people actually thinking about such development in KC though. Downtown KC has been coming back now for 15 years so it's about time downtown started seeing developers floating bigger projects like this. I still think downtown KC also desperately needs one or two more major hotel towers. So just maybe the city will finally see some bigger projects announced in the coming years.

And I don't think it matters where it's at. I don't think that would be an awkward location. Downtown KC is already spread out to Crown Center. So long as it's somewhere in the downtown area is all that matters.

If other buildings go up on Broadway and a few towers eventually go up in the east loop, that would greatly expand the skyline nicely especially since most of KC's taller buildings will be hidden behind the 670 wall from street level soon.

Hasn't this site has already seen many plans? Didn't the Kauffman's oppose the proposed midrise buildings west of Broadway? Wouldn't they oppose this even more? I hope it happens. Broadway needs to be developed badly.
Agree on another hotel, but Bartle Hall needs a big overhaul. Until the City commits to spending a couple hundred million on Bartle, I don’t think another major hotel will get built. Now if the Royals commit to downtown, that could be a game changer.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

KC_JAYHAWK wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 5:49 pm
Fountains wrote: Tue Oct 18, 2022 4:00 pm I'll take more towers but downtown needs infill tbh
Yep. North loop parking lots and Crossroads are prime for infill projects. Need a dozen more 10-15 story buildings, whether commercial, apartments or hotels.

I just don’t see the demand for high rise commercial in KC or most cities, post COVID. My company is HQ’d in 1KCP and it feels empty anytime I go in. I still work 90% of the time from home and I just don’t see that changing. The reason why commercial buildings are considered “mostly occupied” post COVID, is because companies are locked into long term leases. WFH isn’t going away, at least in my opinion.
Correct. I think we're seeing that coming more & more. Crossroads I think will explode once Cap is built and the full connection to downtown is made.
dukuboy1
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1045
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2020 12:02 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by dukuboy1 »

If I recall there was a proposal in that same site that was like horse shoe or like a square C design that had traffic going into a inner courtyard drive way type of thing. Don't recall it having that same kind of height though. I agree it would stick out a lot in the spot, but hopefully it will encourage more high rises in the area along Broadway, but not blocking the Kauffman Center as the standout piece.

Excited for anything to be brewing, even if it is more of wish/dream at this point. Plenty of spots open downtown, some of which had plans on them. Maybe we will see some more activation of those plans. We'll wait and see
User avatar
KCDowntownLoop
Parking Garage
Parking Garage
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2021 8:08 pm
Location: Where Downtown meets Midtown
Contact:

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by KCDowntownLoop »

Aesthetically, I like how this tower would stretch our skyline further to the west. The view from Liberty Memorial toward the central business district would be that much more spectacular on the horizon.

But, as Mahomes once said, "I'll see it when I believe it."
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

I think it's providing a much needed to boost to the western view of our skyline, which currently looks like trash.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17187
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by GRID »

UMKC Roo wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 11:49 am I think it's providing a much needed to boost to the western view of our skyline, which currently looks like trash.
Lol, so true downtown from the west looks smaller than Des Moines. It's not much better from the east. It's mostly due to topography but also the simple fact that KC's tall buildings are mostly on a few east/west streets. There is very little North/South density of towers over 20 stories. From the south (and to a lesser extent the north) KC looks way bigger than it really is and from the east and west it looks way smaller.

I think a 500 footer on broadway south of 670 will look great and it will have insane views of all of downtown. I honestly am not even excited though because this just still seems like vaporware till it actually breaks ground.
User avatar
Chris Stritzel
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by Chris Stritzel »

^The best view of the skyline is from the north by far. South might be the iconic, postcard view but the north is better.

As far as the tower goes, I’m hopeful it happens. I expect the application for up to 500ft is just for extra wiggle room. I expect this to fall around 400-450ft when all is said and done. But it is a very real project.
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

GRID wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 2:03 pm
UMKC Roo wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 11:49 am I think it's providing a much needed to boost to the western view of our skyline, which currently looks like trash.
Lol, so true downtown from the west looks smaller than Des Moines. It's not much better from the east. It's mostly due to topography but also the simple fact that KC's tall buildings are mostly on a few east/west streets. There is very little North/South density of towers over 20 stories. From the south (and to a lesser extent the north) KC looks way bigger than it really is and from the east and west it looks way smaller.

I think a 500 footer on broadway south of 670 will look great and it will have insane views of all of downtown. I honestly am not even excited though because this just still seems like vaporware till it actually breaks ground.
True, so my hope is that this tower helps the west skyline, and the Royals do something to fix up the East skyline.

If that happens, then we’re cookin
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2932
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheLastGentleman »

Chris Stritzel wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 3:06 pmBut it is a very real project.
Unbuilt KC has a lot of former “very real” projects
TheUrbanRoo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1320
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2022 8:39 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by TheUrbanRoo »

Chris Stritzel wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 3:06 pm ^The best view of the skyline is from the north by far.
Absolutely the north view is the best skyline in KC.

You get a rush driving in from the north with the mighty Missouri river on the left and beautiful sprawling skyline facing ahead.
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7431
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: 500 foot mixed use tower considered for downtown

Post by shinatoo »

GRID wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 2:03 pm
UMKC Roo wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 11:49 am I think it's providing a much needed to boost to the western view of our skyline, which currently looks like trash.
Lol, so true downtown from the west looks smaller than Des Moines. It's not much better from the east.
If you actually believe that's true you have zero credibility. Not even remotely true.
Post Reply