Downtown Baseball Stadium

Discussion about new sports facilities in Kansas City
User avatar
taxi
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2081
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: North End
Contact:

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by taxi »

It would be like Knuckleheads when they train passes (under). Perhaps the organ player would jive with the rhythms that the driver made.
aknowledgeableperson
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12625
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 10:31 pm

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by aknowledgeableperson »

"I'm really interested to see what types of plans/locations they come up with because I really think they try to make some decisions in the next 5 years and then you're looking at probably 3 years after that to get it built. Whatever they do, I bet we have something built in the next 10 years."

How do you propose the teams gets out of its lease with the county? Then you have the matter of how to pay for it. Given the cost of new stadiums now just think of what the cost and features it will have to have a decade from now.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by flyingember »

Lease ends 2030

That's 13 years. So planning for 10 years is about right because there will be some kind of delay.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by flyingember »

https://twitter.com/KCLibrary/status/85 ... 68/photo/1

Library posted a photo of one of the older stadiums in KC (didn't check which one). Notice all the parking around it and how all the cars are parked crazy tight
User avatar
WSPanic
Supporter
Posts: 3817
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 4:57 pm

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by WSPanic »

The photo says Opening Day '55 - A's/Tigers. So, would have to be Municipal Stadium at 22nd and Brooklyn, I would think.

That is some crazy parking. Some of those cars are not going to be able to leave early to beat traffic.
brewcrew1000
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3104
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:10 am
Location: Broadway/Gilham according to google maps

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by brewcrew1000 »

WSPanic wrote:The photo says Opening Day '55 - A's/Tigers. So, would have to be Municipal Stadium at 22nd and Brooklyn, I would think.

That is some crazy parking. Some of those cars are not going to be able to leave early to beat traffic.
I'm sure people weren't in a hurry back in those days and most didn't probably live 20-30 miles away from the Stadium.
User avatar
grovester
Oak Tower
Oak Tower
Posts: 4560
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:30 pm
Location: KC Metro

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by grovester »

Parking back then was a service not just a lot. You'd drop your car and the attendant would park it. When you came back, he'd get it and bring it to you. Shuffling cars to do this was a skill and an art form.
pash
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3800
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:47 am

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by pash »

.
KCMOJoe89
Pad site
Pad site
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:22 am

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by KCMOJoe89 »

Site one and two both are horrible. Why would either of those spots work? I could see site three or four working, but neither site seems like a homerun.

I'm with chingon, the site bound by Truman and 18th, Paseo and 71 is great (I thought I was a genius pitching this exact site to friends. Great minds I tell ya). You'd be supporting your investment in the Vine district and creating an actual baseball district in the process. Just because this site isn't in the "middle of it all" doesn't mean it won't be successful. And accessibility would be great from the loop, crossroads, east side while supporting parking and transit could easily be tied in. Makes too much sense!
User avatar
TheLastGentleman
Broadway Square
Broadway Square
Posts: 2912
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2017 9:27 pm

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by TheLastGentleman »

Here's my two cents. I think Kauffman should be maintained for as long as possible. Not only is it in excellent shape, but it, along with arrowhead, are pieces of sports history and beautiful examples of space-age Googie architecture. I think moving out of it, or, God forbid, tearing it down, would be seen in retrospect as a huge mistake.
Also, just today the Star posted this:
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/mlb/ka ... 38861.html
If they do have to move into a new stadium, just keep it out of the loop. Downtown is just recovering from the disaster of postwar urban planning, and a stadium plopped in the middle of it is the last thing the area needs.
So, basically, yeah, all the proposed locations are abysmal. The Flashcube building and the interstate building are being renovated, so how would that even work? And site two overlaps with the college basketball area of the sprint center.....what?
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10169
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by Highlander »

I'm good with a downtown baseball stadium but not sure if the selected sites make all that much sense. Not sure it's feasible but I like the area presently occupied by the hospital hill parking lots north of Pershing. I don't think it's going to happen anytime soon - the recent renovation was just too ... recent. Give it another 10 years before there is serious discussion.

It's fun to read the comments in the article. Most complain about traffic and parking associated with a downtown stadium. Frankly, from a traffic perspective, it's hard to be worse than the stadium complex with its limited exit points. Downtown would be a huge improvement. Even in deplorable Houston traffic, downtown baseball traffic isn't that difficult. Parking problems are in the eye of the beholder - literally. Visitors would not have line of sight parking to stadium if it were downtown, but all would be OK.
User avatar
FangKC
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 18141
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by FangKC »

I don't get the need for the stadium to be within the downtown loop. I would think you would reserve parcels within the loop for 5-to-7 days-a-week uses year-round instead of a few days each month for just a few months out of the year. A stadium seems to be a downtown-adjacent thing.
bobbyhawks
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3890
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by bobbyhawks »

FangKC wrote:I don't get the need for the stadium to be within the downtown loop. I would think you would reserve parcels within the loop for 5-to-7 days-a-week uses year-round instead of a few days each month for just a few months out of the year. A stadium seems to be a downtown-adjacent thing.
Good point, but a baseball stadium is actually used at least 81 out of ~180 days during the peak good weather months. It isn't totally fair to say that it is just used a few days each month for a few months a year. It is used for at least half the year and for almost half the days during that time. If we were talking about a football stadium, I'd totally agree. Also, we've been reserving space for year-round buildings for a long long time, and there are still giant swaths of surface parking. There is a middle ground between taking up valuable future business/residential real estate and putting a stadium far enough away from downtown that people inside the loop don't feel like they can walk there after work or from their condo.
shinatoo
Ambassador
Posts: 7393
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by shinatoo »

The more downtown stadiums I've visited the more I have cooled on this idea. And Highlander, what are you talking about with traffic? It is not even remotely difficult to get out of the TSC after a Royals game. Chiefs, yes, I don't know what the Chiefs did to F that up after 45 years but somehow they seem to be making it worse, but I would never say Royals games have been a problem.

But most importantly, no downtown baseball stadium without serious rail connections.

I could get behind a multi-use stadium (baseball + convention space). Build it over the I-35/I-670 interchange and connect it to Bartle Hall. Otherwise, for single use, it's a classic, keep it where it's at. No need to spend 750 million when we have what is still considered a top 5 stadium.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by flyingember »

If the stadium is really some development inducing location it should be put in a blighted area to drive new development.

So "downtown adjacent" seems to be the smartest idea.

I would think the best spot would be right along one of the studied streetcar corridors and also lines up with the bus backbone.
It also needs to be somewhere that breaking the grid can't have a huge impact

Troost to Tracy, 12th to 14th seems like a good candidate.

The Paseo gives good access to the north and south with direct line ups to I-35 and I-70 and 670
Troost is near ramps to/from the south for 71
There's lots of good access from the loop
It's on a future streetcar corridor and current bus cooridor
And it's an area that if they really want a large parking garage, it can also serve future efforts to revitalize Paseo Industrial
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20042
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by DaveKCMO »

not mentioned in the star article, but i'm told it might take the form of a P3 to reduce or eliminate the need for a massive public subsidy (a major reason why i would oppose any new stadium for any sportsball team).

also, it cannot be in the crossroads. oil and water, people.
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Ambassador
Posts: 20042
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by DaveKCMO »

horizons82
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 458
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2016 8:41 am

Re: Would you like to see the Royals move to a downtown stadium?

Post by horizons82 »

To me, the most transformational and appropriate spot, if you want another stadium downtown, is the current KCATA facility area at roughly 18 & Troost. Take the area from Troost to Lydia, Truman to 18th, and you've got a great contender. It'd accomplish a lot of needs:

- Easily aquired from other public entities
- Less destruction to the street grid than the four sites studied
- Activates a huge swath of urban area, adding another catalyst to an area that needs a jumpstart
- Strengthens the connection from east Crossroads to 18th & Vine area
- Easy highway access and near major transit corridors

It's a shame they're not considering it.
Post Reply