Prospect MAX

Transportation topics in KC
User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:27 am

JBmidtown wrote:Seating. The 71 is always packed. That route definitely needs bigger buses. And, because it's so fun to beat this dead horse, bus shelters couldn't hurt for that corridor.
i hate to break it to you but MAX buses are only ~2 feet longer than a regular #71 bus. you might get one or two more seats.

to reduce crowding you'd need articulated buses or higher frequency (there is no funding for either, as articulated buses would require a new KCATA bus barn).

in this case, upgrading to MAX amenities usually produces a ridership gain. if current buses are overcrowded and frequency is not increased, it could make the situation worse.

JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by JBmidtown » Mon Mar 30, 2015 10:16 am

That's a bummer.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:29 am

http://www.kansascity.com/news/governme ... 35559.html
Transit officials will meet with the transit administration in Washington this week, and if the discussions are positive, as Jarrold expects, the agency will apply later this month for a $30 million federal small-starts grant for the Prospect MAX.

The city and KCATA would provide a local match of about $15 million over several years, and the agency also hopes to get about $8 million in federal surface transportation funds, Jarrold said.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Mon Oct 12, 2015 8:41 am

City Manager Troy Schulte says if the federal grant is approved, the city would then ask voters to approve issuing bonds to pay the city's share.

“At some point we could come back and say, 'We need a $15 or $18 million match specifically for Prospect corridor,' and would that be something we could put on a ballot?” Schulte said.

Schulte says that point would likely be two years or more from now, but by then planning would be complete so the city would be able to show the voters exactly how the bond money would be spent
http://kcur.org/post/prospect-avenue-bu ... oves-ahead

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Wed Dec 16, 2015 11:32 am

KCATA board of commissioners is expected to approve a $650K contract today with HNTB for the project development phase of prospect MAX.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:27 pm

prospect MAX was named in the president's FY 2017 budget for $30 million under the 'small starts' program. now we just need local funding...

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:17 am

two stations downtown to be used by prospect MAX will be built in the next year -- petticoat/main and 12th/grand. major tie-in to city work at linwood shopping center. the project is also a key component of the city's federal smart cities grant application (winner to be announced in march).

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Tue Apr 12, 2016 7:53 am

KCMO/KCATA will receive technical assistance in developing transit-oriented development along the prospect MAX line: http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/2016/ ... -projects/

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Mon Apr 25, 2016 2:17 pm

appropriation will force the project to seek funding in multiple federal budgets. some will come from 2017 and then probably at least one more cycle. one a project gets some, it will definitely get the rest.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:51 pm

Image

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:34 pm

city manager confirms (again) local match for prospect MAX will be paid for with the GO bond package.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:03 pm

DaveKCMO wrote:city manager confirms (again) local match for prospect MAX will be paid for with the GO bond package.
prospect MAX funding is listed in the exhibit that was attached to the non-binding resolution for the GO bond. now if we can get get an appropriation from congress...

JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by JBmidtown » Sun Jan 29, 2017 1:26 am

DaveKCMO wrote:
DaveKCMO wrote:city manager confirms (again) local match for prospect MAX will be paid for with the GO bond package.
prospect MAX funding is listed in the exhibit that was attached to the non-binding resolution for the GO bond. now if we can get get an appropriation from congress...
What's the plan B for the Prospect MAX if the GO bond vote fails?

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Sun Jan 29, 2017 1:07 pm

i'm not aware of one.

JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by JBmidtown » Sun Jan 29, 2017 2:18 pm

DaveKCMO wrote:i'm not aware of one.
Well I hope transit activists are getting the word out to vote in April.

JBmidtown
Colonnade
Colonnade
Posts: 742
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2015 11:31 am

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by JBmidtown » Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:02 am

The GO bonds passed. What's the word on Prospect MAX?

chingon
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3412
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: South Plaza

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by chingon » Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:11 am

I would love to the the city work to creatively align the goals of Prospect Max with whatever the East Side Development tax is supposed to be doing. What's the best way to do that, TOD policy? There seems to be a pretty large disconnect between east side advocates and understanding that population loss and sprawl-by-adandonment are crippling problems for East KC and Northeast.

flyingember
One Park Place
One Park Place
Posts: 6808
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by flyingember » Wed Apr 05, 2017 9:30 am

The grocery store project is a good example of focusing on a clear need and making it happen. It's the kind of project that hopefully will spur neighborhood reinvestment because it provides nearby food accessible to all using many modes and jobs too. I would also call it a benchmark of a quality neighborhood.

As we know the east side doesn't have a lack of community interest in improvement, it has had a lack of focus with coordinating money to encourage that focus. Hopefully this tax can come with a clear focus on what it wants to fund and it sticks to those items. Not throwing money at just anyone would be a failure.

Temporary construction jobs are temporary. Roads need repair. Chasing the jobs that disappeared is a folly. I would like to see a large portion go to a local entrepreneur grant fund. A local wanting to buy a building or lot, renovate it or build on it and open a business employing people should be at the top of the list.

I don't buy this money going to MAX for this reason, but I do think it's smart to score higher funding requests for projects on high frequency transit corridors, areas with good walking accessibility, places senior citizens can get to on their own and such. And Prospect with MAX would fit that bill.

Aligning goals is a necessity.

User avatar
DaveKCMO
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 16601
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 6:22 pm
Location: Crossroads
Contact:

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by DaveKCMO » Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:48 pm

JBmidtown wrote:The GO bonds passed. What's the word on Prospect MAX?
we got the word out on question 1.

the next step is ensuring the federal grant is delivered. the project was named in obama's last budget, but has yet to receive it's funding agreement (requires a congressional appropriation).

User avatar
FangKC
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 12935
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2003 10:02 pm
Location: Old Northeast -- Indian Mound

Re: Prospect MAX

Post by FangKC » Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:59 pm

flyingember wrote:The grocery store project is a good example of focusing on a clear need and making it happen. It's the kind of project that hopefully will spur neighborhood reinvestment because it provides nearby food accessible to all using many modes and jobs too. I would also call it a benchmark of a quality neighborhood.

As we know the east side doesn't have a lack of community interest in improvement, it has had a lack of focus with coordinating money to encourage that focus. Hopefully this tax can come with a clear focus on what it wants to fund and it sticks to those items. Not throwing money at just anyone would be a failure.

Temporary construction jobs are temporary. Roads need repair. Chasing the jobs that disappeared is a folly. I would like to see a large portion go to a local entrepreneur grant fund. A local wanting to buy a building or lot, renovate it or build on it and open a business employing people should be at the top of the list.

I don't buy this money going to MAX for this reason, but I do think it's smart to score higher funding requests for projects on high frequency transit corridors, areas with good walking accessibility, places senior citizens can get to on their own and such. And Prospect with MAX would fit that bill.

Aligning goals is a necessity.
If I recall, one of the goals of the Linwood Shopping Center grocery store redevelopment project includes an effort to redevelop vacant residential lots around the store as well as buy and rehab many of the older houses--the vast majority of which are rental houses, and convert them into owner-occupied homes. That area has an astonishingly high percentage of rental houses. I think it's over 80 percent.

Post Reply