Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Find out what's going on in the Sunflower State's portions of the Metro here.
User avatar
KCPowercat
Ambassador
Posts: 33835
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Quality Hill
Contact:

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by KCPowercat »

Is this place ran by a guy playing Rollercoaster Tycoon?
User avatar
Highlander
City Center Square
City Center Square
Posts: 10169
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by Highlander »

mistervinix wrote:So the Verruckt's opening has been delayed again. When this thing finally does start running, any guess as to how often it will break down? And leave would-be riders stranded at the top of all those stairs? In 95-degree humid July heat?
By the time it opens, it seems 95 degree heat may not be a problem but riders may need to trade in the inner tubes for luges.
mistervinix
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:48 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by mistervinix »

[quote="By the time it opens, it seems 95 degree heat may not be a problem but riders may need to trade in the inner tubes for luges."[/quote]

I seem to recall that Schlitterbahn - when the KCK park was first announced - claimed they had some ideas for year-round rides. I'm not holding my breath for any of those to materialize.
User avatar
im2kull
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by im2kull »

Kinda funny how they denied they were having issues with the test dummys flying off the slide, then openly admitted to it yesterday...

I hate lies like that.
brewcrew1000
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3104
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 10:10 am
Location: Broadway/Gilham according to google maps

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by brewcrew1000 »

Why does the ride need that extra hill? I think that extra hill is the one causing the problems, i think people would have enjoyed the ride with one large drop and claim they were on the worlds tallest ride.
flyingember
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9862
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:54 am

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by flyingember »

brewcrew1000 wrote:Why does the ride need that extra hill? I think that extra hill is the one causing the problems, i think people would have enjoyed the ride with one large drop and claim they were on the worlds tallest ride.
math and cost

if you hit the bottom going 60-70mph it's going to take a certain amount of friction or gravity to slow you down. the greater the speed the more of this it takes.

they could 1. design a super long end zone, likely many times the length of the actual slide, 2. they could do what OOF did and have it level out over and over to decrease the max speed which means less end zone needed (there's sidewalk street view in google maps), 3. they could put a splashdown zone to absorb energy, which you have to decrease the speed when you hit the end as at some point it would kill people from the whiplash force produced like with a car accident, or 4. you can build a hill like a roller coaster and let gravity and increased upward drag help out, with each new hill.

guess which one they picked. a combination of 1 and 4.

they probably are still tweaking this combination and the raft inflation to account for variable weights of riders. like the exact amount of water, drain location and such all play a part too. like you need enough water if a boat is 150lb heavier that the one before so it floats and doesn't stop halfway up the hill or scrape and cause damage. you can't have rafts bumping the edge as that could cause them to flip over so that means the right amount of water to keep them even in the trough and people shift during rides so even the raft design matters a ton.

there's a TON of math involved in getting it right.
kcjak
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2429
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by kcjak »

I was just at Schlitterbahn yesterday and they were still actively working on the ride. I was really surprised at how short the end zone was for such a long slide.

Also caught part of the Travel Channel show on the building of the ride - they showed the test where the raft and sandbags flew off the slide. The company ended up replacing the second hill, which reduced the incline from something like a 44% grade to 20-something percent...at the cost of over a million dollars.
User avatar
im2kull
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: KCMO

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by im2kull »

brewcrew1000 wrote:Why does the ride need that extra hill? I think that extra hill is the one causing the problems, i think people would have enjoyed the ride with one large drop and claim they were on the worlds tallest ride.

The owner of Schlitterbahn parks said that he wanted it to be a ride crazier than any other, since really it's only a few feet taller than the next tallest water slide, and the hill was the way to do that. Nothing to do with the landing area size or what not. Just to give you a weightless feeling that no other slide does, right after a huge free fall. They're having so many problems with the math on it because riders can come in all shapes and sizes, and that to get the weightless feeling you have to get slightly airborne..but not fly off. That's a much different equation for a 60lb kid than a 300lb person.

He also said they choose the KCK waterpark because it's the only one that has no building height restrictions.
User avatar
AllThingsKC
Mark Twain Tower
Mark Twain Tower
Posts: 9352
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Kansas City, Missouri (Downtown)
Contact:

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by AllThingsKC »

User avatar
chaglang
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 4132
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:44 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by chaglang »

The name of this needs to be Wasserrutsche Tod, not Verruckt.
mistervinix
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:48 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by mistervinix »

Now they may be part of "Village East":

http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/n ... bonds.html

It's high time that area starts looking like something other than an abandoned construction zone.
geeman68
Western Auto Lofts
Western Auto Lofts
Posts: 664
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 12:22 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by geeman68 »

mistervinix wrote:Now they may be part of "Village East":

http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/n ... bonds.html

It's high time that area starts looking like something other than an abandoned construction zone.
Kansas is in financial distress and they are now setting up another Star bonds issue?
kboish
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: West Plaza

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by kboish »

$300 million dollars worth.
loftguy
Bryant Building
Bryant Building
Posts: 3850
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 12:12 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by loftguy »

Why not? Brownback's going to be out of office, so he doesn't have to worry about the repercussions.
mistervinix
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:48 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by mistervinix »

kboish wrote:$300 million dollars worth.
And one suspects Schlitterbahn will never expand without this...

Predictable.
kcjak
Penntower
Penntower
Posts: 2429
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:02 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by kcjak »

If I read that correctly one of the potential specified uses is automotive plaza...subsidized by taxpayers.
kboish
Hotel President
Hotel President
Posts: 3258
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: West Plaza

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by kboish »

kcjak wrote:If I read that correctly one of the potential specified uses is automotive plaza...subsidized by taxpayers.
Actually I think they are planning 2 car dealerships to be funded by taxpayers
longviewmo
Alameda Tower
Alameda Tower
Posts: 1008
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 12:58 am
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Contact:

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by longviewmo »

Here's the official document detailing the plans for the area.

http://www.wycokck.org/WorkArea/Downloa ... x?id=40097 (WARNING: automatically downloads)

Up to 7 dealerships.
mistervinix
New York Life
New York Life
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 10:48 pm

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by mistervinix »

I think it's safe to say that the "Vacation Village" vision of Schlitterbahn is dead. A 150-room hotel, car dealerships and a convenience store don't scream "vacation" to me.

At least the land will finally be developed.
User avatar
GRID
City Hall
City Hall
Posts: 17083
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Re: Schlitterbahn Waterpark and Resort

Post by GRID »

mistervinix wrote:I think it's safe to say that the "Vacation Village" vision of Schlitterbahn is dead. A 150-room hotel, car dealerships and a convenience store don't scream "vacation" to me.

At least the land will finally be developed.
Other than the new slide, I don't see this park keeping the Schlitterbahn name unless they follow through with later phases. The park just seems incomplete or thrown together. It doesn't have the same quality aesthetically or attractions wise as the Texas parks.
Post Reply