I figured even you can't remember everything.DaveKCMO wrote:i've been quoted back to myself. weird.
and it was easier to find there than on the NKC website
I figured even you can't remember everything.DaveKCMO wrote:i've been quoted back to myself. weird.
That makes complete sense. Go take a look at what's a long that area from an aerial viewFangKC wrote:The SW Boulevard line seems to be the least needed. I don't see a big payoff for that line. I'd rather see one run down Linwood or 31st Street to at least Benton, or Armour Boulevard to Bruce Watkins Drive. Armour would probably be the best, since it has a lot of apartment buildings already along it, and potential for new ones to be constructed.
that is true. I guess the first question to ask then is why there isn't along that section.DaveKCMO wrote:remember the financing approach, though... strong political support and enough value to capture in a TDD to pay for a large portion of construction and operations. i'm not keen on putting a streetcar where there's no bus service today.
hopefully it stays that way. I'm sure that's easily removed to put in more seats.smh wrote:Don't forget that the KC Streetcar will not be the historic "trolley"-style cars found in NOLA. It will be modern and accommodating of bicycles, much like Portland and Seattle which have hooks in each car for a couple of bicycles.
Ahh, got it. Well, if it's any additional consolation, the bike hooks tend to be in the area near the doors which is only really suited for standing and not particularly vulnerable to the addition of more seats. Having just observed bikes on the streetcar but never taking my own, it appears you just hook your bike and then sort of stand with it--and this somehow does not block the doors...flyingember wrote:hopefully it stays that way. I'm sure that's easily removed to put in more seats.smh wrote:Don't forget that the KC Streetcar will not be the historic "trolley"-style cars found in NOLA. It will be modern and accommodating of bicycles, much like Portland and Seattle which have hooks in each car for a couple of bicycles.
my point was that not being bike friendly was a downside to that system and ours should be bike friendly.
NOLA could easily add bike racks to the outside like our busses have.
I saw the racks in Minneapolis. They looked well thought out.smh wrote:Ahh, got it. Well, if it's any additional consolation, the bike hooks tend to be in the area near the doors which is only really suited for standing and not particularly vulnerable to the addition of more seats. Having just observed bikes on the streetcar but never taking my own, it appears you just hook your bike and then sort of stand with it--and this somehow does not block the doors...flyingember wrote:hopefully it stays that way. I'm sure that's easily removed to put in more seats.smh wrote:Don't forget that the KC Streetcar will not be the historic "trolley"-style cars found in NOLA. It will be modern and accommodating of bicycles, much like Portland and Seattle which have hooks in each car for a couple of bicycles.
my point was that not being bike friendly was a downside to that system and ours should be bike friendly.
NOLA could easily add bike racks to the outside like our busses have.
He's killing me with his whining. I have been a fan of Yael in the past, but the more I follow him on Twitter and his blog the more I'm realizing that he is the guy in the back of the crowd who always has a pessimistic comment or question about everything even when it is perfectly obvious to everyone else in the room. You're totally correct that he is just trying to find controversy where none exists.KCPowercat wrote:Anybody else find Yael whining about the crown center change as idiotic and just trying to stir up issues?
Why bend into crown center a half a block.... Wouldn't that cause more problems for South expansion. I have always found the MAX bend into crown center as foolish.... Why slow down the streetcar as well? I'm quite certain people can walk a block to main.
I think it's a valid point but in a different way if the funding works out. Say we have the option of saving $2 million or spending it under current funding options.KCPowercat wrote:Anybody else find Yael whining about the crown center change as idiotic and just trying to stir up issues?
Why bend into crown center a half a block.... Wouldn't that cause more problems for South expansion. I have always found the MAX bend into crown center as foolish.... Why slow down the streetcar as well? I'm quite certain people can walk a block to main.
KCPowercat wrote:Anybody else find Yael whining about the crown center change as idiotic and just trying to stir up issues?
Why bend into crown center a half a block.... Wouldn't that cause more problems for South expansion. I have always found the MAX bend into crown center as foolish.... Why slow down the streetcar as well? I'm quite certain people can walk a block to main.
Definently. Let's use Amtrak as an example.markf wrote: Dangerboy. The 5 minute headway thing is also important. I saw the Jaime Lerner lecture and he emphasized that short headways are crucial for transit success.
Say what?longviewmo wrote:A national network isn't run quite the same as a two mile long streetcar line.
that thinking is part of the problemlongviewmo wrote:A national network isn't run quite the same as a two mile long streetcar line.