MC86 wrote: It is acceptable in the Architectural community to have up to 7 mistakes, per page of Architectural drawings.
Well, no wonder my job is so difficult.
MC86 wrote: It is acceptable in the Architectural community to have up to 7 mistakes, per page of Architectural drawings.
No kidding.KCFutbol wrote:
Well, no wonder my job is so difficult.
Sounds as though that was written by lawyers for the benefit of lawyers.MC86 wrote: No kidding.
I had just recently bid a project, a rather large job, that had a Specification section labeled "Delegated Design Requirements."
Basically, it stated that the Owner and the Architect could ''Delegate'' the design of portions of the project to the sub contractors, and the subcontractor was responsible for the design, engineering, compatibility with structural, Mechanical, etc...... How do you put a number on that in a hard bid? Will they delegate 5% of my portion of the work, or 50%, or none?
In my bid, I put an hourly rate in for this ''requirement.'' The contractor told me that my number was ''incomplete.''KCFutbol wrote: Sounds as though that was written by lawyers for the benefit of lawyers.
hmm, really? I've yet to see anything in person, but I actually quite like the big concave sheet of glass facing Illus Davis, as seen in the renderings. It seems like it might shape the space on the park's eastern edge a bit like the Bloch Building's lenses on the Nelson lawn, as well as provide some tranparency and thus activity on that edge.Not crazy about the concave facade when all the other structures on the north-south axis of Davis Park are rigidly flat.
i looked it up. i knew what it was about but didn't know the exact history. they probably signed the last beam too.Pork Chop wrote: I don't remember the significance of this, but the evergreen branch (actually looks like a little Christmas tree) is on the top of the building. I believe that means the last beam has been installed?
The building is a cast-in-place concrete frame. There are no steel beams.Beermo wrote: i looked it up. i knew what it was about but didn't know the exact history. they probably signed the last beam too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topping_off
Then it was symbolic or used as tradition; even though there were no steel beams used. It's just good to see they are finished with the framing of the building or whatever it's calledKCFutbol wrote: The building is a cast-in-place concrete frame. There are no steel beams.